When I was growing up, I actually considered a career in politics. I quickly changed my mind, though, when I discovered that there was way too much politics involved in it. Obviously, that's a play on words, but I get funny looks from people when I tell them that. However, I am completely serious. The politics of running for and holding elective office is influenced too much by the politics of power, influence, and money. But whose fault is it that such a condition exists? I believe voters have no one to blame but themselves.
As a voting public, we have become entirely too sophisticated for our own good. Many of us have made a habit of voting pragmatically, i.e., voting for the person we think has the best chance to win instead of the person we most agree with. We complain about wishy-washy politicians who won't give us straight answers, yet when people who say what they really think run for office, we dismiss them as being "loose cannons." When any candidate makes a statement that's evenly slightly out of the mainstream, it is considered such an egregious act that he or she either becomes marginalized or is forced to drop out of the race. What's left is a bunch of cautious and robotic weenies with their fingers in the wind - people who form their decisions based on polls and focus groups.
We say we want candidates who are different, but not too different. We say we want new ideas but we shun candidates that seem the least bit precocious. Therefore, we end up with the kinds of candidates we've always had.
I've often heard voters comment on candidates by making statements like "I couldn't imagine her being elected" or "he sends shivers down my spine." Most people will automatically exclude any candidate who would fit those kinds of descriptions. But should they? Sometimes good candidates come in packages that might be a little different or even a bit scary. By disqualifying those types of candidates, we could be missing out on some potentially great leaders. I wonder how many of today's sophisticated voters would consider someone like Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, or Teddy Roosevelt too much of a "nut" to be elected.
We like to say the issues are the important things to us. However, many of us vote based on personalities. For example, we will decide on a presidential candidate based on who seems the most "presidential" (whatever that means). We are also too concerned about meaningless ceremonial issues. For example, I bet some people wouldn't vote for an unmarried man for president because of their concern about the absence of a first lady. We also put too great of an emphasis on superficial issues such as aesthetics, i.e., how someone looks. Richard Nixon may have lost the 1960 election because he didn't look as good on TV as John F. Kennedy during their debate.
We also stress a candidate's education a little too much. Education is important, but it's not everything. Some of smartest people in the world never attended college. However, many of us wouldn't consider someone for any office higher than dog catcher unless he or she had at least a Bachelor's degree.
Many voters make their ballot selections based on personal greed instead of what's best for their country, state, district, or locality. They will reserve their votes for politicians whom they think will give them things and/or make life easier for them. Of course, Politicians constantly exploit this greed by making outlandish promises. Once these politicians are elected, they either have to renege on those promises or create budget deficits in order to bring them about.
Other voters, while not so much motivated by personal greed, will vote based on localized interests at the expense of the more general interests. For example, they might vote for a particular congressional candidate because they think he will bring a lot of goodies to their district. This mentality also helps to forge a cycle of promises, broken promises, and budget deficits. Until voters begin to put the general good ahead of personal and parochial interests, these problems will persist.
We like to blame the news media for all of the "gotcha" political stories that pry too deeply into the personal lives and distant past history of candidates and therefore keep many good and qualified people out the political arena. However, it is ultimately our fault because we eat that stuff up. We can't get enough of it. The more dirt the news outlets dig up on various candidates, the more we buy their newspapers and tune in to their TV and radio stations for more of those stories. The sad part is that we allow that stuff to influence our votes. Most of it is irrelevant to the issues at hand and should not be taken seriously by voters. We do usually ignore the parts about the candidates or parties we like, but we tend to believe the parts about the candidates or parties we don't like. Therefore, the news media keeps feeding us this garbage.
Last but not least, one of our biggest problems is our unwillingness to vote for independent or third party candidates. These candidates generally do not have obligations to party bosses or quid pro quo relationships with lobbyists like the major party candidates do. Very often, we will vote for the lesser of two evils, rather than an independent or third party candidate who might be much better. Of course, when you vote for the lesser of two evils, you're still voting for an evil. Many people feel like they would be wasting their vote by voting for any of those other candidates. This is simply not true. A voter only wastes his/her vote when he/she votes for someone he/she does not really like. Instead, we create a voting catch-22 for ourselves, i.e., no one will vote for Mr. Independent because he has no chance; Mr. Independent has no chance because no one will vote for him. If enough people decided to start voting their conscience, we could break that vicious cycle.
Terry Mitchell is a software engineer, freelance writer, and trivia buff from Hopewell, VA. He also serves as a political columnist for American Daily and operates his own website - http://www.commenterry.com - on which he posts commentaries on various subjects such as politics, technology, religion, health and well-being, personal finance, and sports. His commentaries offer a unique point of view that is not often found in mainstream media.
professional maid services Park Ridge ..Well here is a great new product, we first saw... Read More
The Carl Rove issue is definitely interesting and distracting. The... Read More
I believe it would be good for the economy for... Read More
Originally published in 1958, "The Ugly American" (Lederer & Burdick)... Read More
Political strategists, branding gurus and image consultants could learn a... Read More
Many believe Al-Qaida already has nukes in the United States... Read More
As baby boomers, we have been spoiled all of our... Read More
Federal Trade Commission Owes Industry and Entrepreneurs an Apology. The... Read More
Are you happy with all this so-called security after 9-11?... Read More
Incompetence is all too obvious at the trade shows of... Read More
It is widely known in the Homosexual Male Populations that... Read More
Recently scientists have been watching the exponential growth of marine... Read More
Predicting the future is a tricky business. There have been... Read More
Telemarketing and DO NOT CALL lists sure made headlines, but... Read More
City Governments is their quest for; "quality of life" often... Read More
Many people make a lot of money in war. In... Read More
The Jihad against the Western World will continue. It will... Read More
In the most rewarding new industries, there is often a... Read More
The current political efforts aimed at improving the American public... Read More
30 years ago, California, later followed by other states, decided... Read More
At the start of the US involvement in WWII Joseph... Read More
Today we have a new franchise report from the Federal... Read More
From the comfort of their plush offices and five to... Read More
[Author's Note: Another essay that I wrote on notebook paper... Read More
All countries have specific things that are abundant in the... Read More
cleaning lady near Lincolnshire ..The North American Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was implemented on January... Read More
If a farmer plants the same crop three seasons in... Read More
Many Americans feel betrayed by their government, our government. I... Read More
The idea that the majority shows the will of the... Read More
One way to increase evaporation in the ocean might be... Read More
Veterans Affairs Employees using government credit cards on personal items?... Read More
The great people of the United States of America deserve... Read More
The price at the gas pump is certainly on everyone's... Read More
Last year a Maryland State Legislator whom I presume never... Read More
1) IS HAVING A DEMOCRACY MORE EFFECTIVE IN ADDRESSING POLITICAL... Read More
A SOLUTION FOR EMPLOYMENT PROBLEMS TO AID IN THE FIGHT... Read More
It can be dangerous to engage in free speech. This... Read More
"Had there not been outsourcing and utilization of cheaper resources... Read More
In this day and age of tattletale, whistleblower heroes and... Read More
We learned some lessons in these last few wars. For... Read More
The Connecticut Conference of Municipalities (CCM) is interested in the... Read More
Much of our personal and cultural perspective on the world... Read More
Currently the United States has weapons, which can shoot around... Read More
In the last two weeks, two non-senior US officials indirectly... Read More
IT'S NO LONGER NEWS THAT CHINA IS BECOMING A MAJOR... Read More
As baby boomers, we have been spoiled all of our... Read More
What is the so-called "nuclear option" that Senator Bill Frist... Read More
..."history may judge us to be the real bully if,... Read More
We are told by out leadership that we risk loss... Read More
The Randolphs:Peyton Randolph was the first President of the United... Read More
Political |