When I was growing up, I actually considered a career in politics. I quickly changed my mind, though, when I discovered that there was way too much politics involved in it. Obviously, that's a play on words, but I get funny looks from people when I tell them that. However, I am completely serious. The politics of running for and holding elective office is influenced too much by the politics of power, influence, and money. But whose fault is it that such a condition exists? I believe voters have no one to blame but themselves.
As a voting public, we have become entirely too sophisticated for our own good. Many of us have made a habit of voting pragmatically, i.e., voting for the person we think has the best chance to win instead of the person we most agree with. We complain about wishy-washy politicians who won't give us straight answers, yet when people who say what they really think run for office, we dismiss them as being "loose cannons." When any candidate makes a statement that's evenly slightly out of the mainstream, it is considered such an egregious act that he or she either becomes marginalized or is forced to drop out of the race. What's left is a bunch of cautious and robotic weenies with their fingers in the wind - people who form their decisions based on polls and focus groups.
We say we want candidates who are different, but not too different. We say we want new ideas but we shun candidates that seem the least bit precocious. Therefore, we end up with the kinds of candidates we've always had.
I've often heard voters comment on candidates by making statements like "I couldn't imagine her being elected" or "he sends shivers down my spine." Most people will automatically exclude any candidate who would fit those kinds of descriptions. But should they? Sometimes good candidates come in packages that might be a little different or even a bit scary. By disqualifying those types of candidates, we could be missing out on some potentially great leaders. I wonder how many of today's sophisticated voters would consider someone like Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, or Teddy Roosevelt too much of a "nut" to be elected.
We like to say the issues are the important things to us. However, many of us vote based on personalities. For example, we will decide on a presidential candidate based on who seems the most "presidential" (whatever that means). We are also too concerned about meaningless ceremonial issues. For example, I bet some people wouldn't vote for an unmarried man for president because of their concern about the absence of a first lady. We also put too great of an emphasis on superficial issues such as aesthetics, i.e., how someone looks. Richard Nixon may have lost the 1960 election because he didn't look as good on TV as John F. Kennedy during their debate.
We also stress a candidate's education a little too much. Education is important, but it's not everything. Some of smartest people in the world never attended college. However, many of us wouldn't consider someone for any office higher than dog catcher unless he or she had at least a Bachelor's degree.
Many voters make their ballot selections based on personal greed instead of what's best for their country, state, district, or locality. They will reserve their votes for politicians whom they think will give them things and/or make life easier for them. Of course, Politicians constantly exploit this greed by making outlandish promises. Once these politicians are elected, they either have to renege on those promises or create budget deficits in order to bring them about.
Other voters, while not so much motivated by personal greed, will vote based on localized interests at the expense of the more general interests. For example, they might vote for a particular congressional candidate because they think he will bring a lot of goodies to their district. This mentality also helps to forge a cycle of promises, broken promises, and budget deficits. Until voters begin to put the general good ahead of personal and parochial interests, these problems will persist.
We like to blame the news media for all of the "gotcha" political stories that pry too deeply into the personal lives and distant past history of candidates and therefore keep many good and qualified people out the political arena. However, it is ultimately our fault because we eat that stuff up. We can't get enough of it. The more dirt the news outlets dig up on various candidates, the more we buy their newspapers and tune in to their TV and radio stations for more of those stories. The sad part is that we allow that stuff to influence our votes. Most of it is irrelevant to the issues at hand and should not be taken seriously by voters. We do usually ignore the parts about the candidates or parties we like, but we tend to believe the parts about the candidates or parties we don't like. Therefore, the news media keeps feeding us this garbage.
Last but not least, one of our biggest problems is our unwillingness to vote for independent or third party candidates. These candidates generally do not have obligations to party bosses or quid pro quo relationships with lobbyists like the major party candidates do. Very often, we will vote for the lesser of two evils, rather than an independent or third party candidate who might be much better. Of course, when you vote for the lesser of two evils, you're still voting for an evil. Many people feel like they would be wasting their vote by voting for any of those other candidates. This is simply not true. A voter only wastes his/her vote when he/she votes for someone he/she does not really like. Instead, we create a voting catch-22 for ourselves, i.e., no one will vote for Mr. Independent because he has no chance; Mr. Independent has no chance because no one will vote for him. If enough people decided to start voting their conscience, we could break that vicious cycle.
Terry Mitchell is a software engineer, freelance writer, and trivia buff from Hopewell, VA. He also serves as a political columnist for American Daily and operates his own website - http://www.commenterry.com - on which he posts commentaries on various subjects such as politics, technology, religion, health and well-being, personal finance, and sports. His commentaries offer a unique point of view that is not often found in mainstream media.
housekeepers near Park Ridge ..Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, has... Read More
For years I have been amazed as I've listened to... Read More
Government budgets represent between 25% and 50% of he Gross... Read More
I propose a special Projection Device code-named: "TIPED". This system... Read More
The great leader and Senator from New York and wife... Read More
We are seeing some trade wars brewing as American trade... Read More
"Similar to Medieval Inquisitions, judges have been given the authority,... Read More
It appears the Feds are suing Elliot Spitzer over his... Read More
I just got done reading a series of articles dating... Read More
Peace in the Middle East - whoa that is a... Read More
Using Harmonic Beams to Pre-Detonate Shoulder Launched Surface to Air... Read More
Where are all the high-speed trains we were promised? Where... Read More
In order to build a stronger, more self-sufficient America, America... Read More
The use of homosexual men in the area of espionage... Read More
Our Airports have excess capacity, which is not being used... Read More
As we increase our populations every new soul will require... Read More
Fifteen hours is a tremendous barrier. It is the obstacle... Read More
Originally published in 1958, "The Ugly American" (Lederer & Burdick)... Read More
In Police Magazine I read a great article about transient... Read More
Currently when we transport troops we use large cargo planes... Read More
Regarding the de-regulation of energy, this is not such a... Read More
The most damaging factor to our economy today is the... Read More
Do you ever wonder how everything gets to the super... Read More
Some call it the "unofficial" or "informal" economy, others call... Read More
Britain has a proud tradition of valiant armed forces and... Read More
scheduled cleaning services Mundelein ..Peace in the Middle East - whoa that is a... Read More
All to often law makers and regulators create rules and... Read More
America is filled with standouts and perserverance; our nation has... Read More
Where are all the high-speed trains we were promised? Where... Read More
Believe it or not, every theatre, church, or Britney Spears... Read More
This brings to our consciousness, issues concerning the ever rising... Read More
The gun control debate in America is a battle between... Read More
This is the first of a series of four articles... Read More
The official figures are staggering: 35% of the workforce -... Read More
The United States has enemies, which call the country the... Read More
Freedom is in the eyes of the beholder. In Communist... Read More
In an age of terrorism, guerilla and total warfare the... Read More
Using Harmonic Beams to Pre-Detonate Shoulder Launched Surface to Air... Read More
I. The FactsJust days before a much-awaited donor conference, the... Read More
Introduction:Although politicians and so-called "Intelligence Experts" are the ones appearing... Read More
As pictures and videos surface showing young American soldiers humiliating... Read More
President George W. Bush has unofficially won his re-election bid... Read More
(1) Each person is to have an equal right to... Read More
Most government agencies cannot pass an audit of their expenses.... Read More
Are the junior attorneys in the Attorney General's office leaving... Read More
We recently saw another ferry accident, this one in NY... Read More
All the indicators show an improving economy and, finally, the... Read More
One of my favourite pieces of music is the Sex... Read More
Long Term Environmental Effect of Plastics, Composites and Other Materials... Read More
What ordinary people are saying about U.S. televangelist Pat Robertson... Read More
Political |