When I was growing up, I actually considered a career in politics. I quickly changed my mind, though, when I discovered that there was way too much politics involved in it. Obviously, that's a play on words, but I get funny looks from people when I tell them that. However, I am completely serious. The politics of running for and holding elective office is influenced too much by the politics of power, influence, and money. But whose fault is it that such a condition exists? I believe voters have no one to blame but themselves.
As a voting public, we have become entirely too sophisticated for our own good. Many of us have made a habit of voting pragmatically, i.e., voting for the person we think has the best chance to win instead of the person we most agree with. We complain about wishy-washy politicians who won't give us straight answers, yet when people who say what they really think run for office, we dismiss them as being "loose cannons." When any candidate makes a statement that's evenly slightly out of the mainstream, it is considered such an egregious act that he or she either becomes marginalized or is forced to drop out of the race. What's left is a bunch of cautious and robotic weenies with their fingers in the wind - people who form their decisions based on polls and focus groups.
We say we want candidates who are different, but not too different. We say we want new ideas but we shun candidates that seem the least bit precocious. Therefore, we end up with the kinds of candidates we've always had.
I've often heard voters comment on candidates by making statements like "I couldn't imagine her being elected" or "he sends shivers down my spine." Most people will automatically exclude any candidate who would fit those kinds of descriptions. But should they? Sometimes good candidates come in packages that might be a little different or even a bit scary. By disqualifying those types of candidates, we could be missing out on some potentially great leaders. I wonder how many of today's sophisticated voters would consider someone like Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, or Teddy Roosevelt too much of a "nut" to be elected.
We like to say the issues are the important things to us. However, many of us vote based on personalities. For example, we will decide on a presidential candidate based on who seems the most "presidential" (whatever that means). We are also too concerned about meaningless ceremonial issues. For example, I bet some people wouldn't vote for an unmarried man for president because of their concern about the absence of a first lady. We also put too great of an emphasis on superficial issues such as aesthetics, i.e., how someone looks. Richard Nixon may have lost the 1960 election because he didn't look as good on TV as John F. Kennedy during their debate.
We also stress a candidate's education a little too much. Education is important, but it's not everything. Some of smartest people in the world never attended college. However, many of us wouldn't consider someone for any office higher than dog catcher unless he or she had at least a Bachelor's degree.
Many voters make their ballot selections based on personal greed instead of what's best for their country, state, district, or locality. They will reserve their votes for politicians whom they think will give them things and/or make life easier for them. Of course, Politicians constantly exploit this greed by making outlandish promises. Once these politicians are elected, they either have to renege on those promises or create budget deficits in order to bring them about.
Other voters, while not so much motivated by personal greed, will vote based on localized interests at the expense of the more general interests. For example, they might vote for a particular congressional candidate because they think he will bring a lot of goodies to their district. This mentality also helps to forge a cycle of promises, broken promises, and budget deficits. Until voters begin to put the general good ahead of personal and parochial interests, these problems will persist.
We like to blame the news media for all of the "gotcha" political stories that pry too deeply into the personal lives and distant past history of candidates and therefore keep many good and qualified people out the political arena. However, it is ultimately our fault because we eat that stuff up. We can't get enough of it. The more dirt the news outlets dig up on various candidates, the more we buy their newspapers and tune in to their TV and radio stations for more of those stories. The sad part is that we allow that stuff to influence our votes. Most of it is irrelevant to the issues at hand and should not be taken seriously by voters. We do usually ignore the parts about the candidates or parties we like, but we tend to believe the parts about the candidates or parties we don't like. Therefore, the news media keeps feeding us this garbage.
Last but not least, one of our biggest problems is our unwillingness to vote for independent or third party candidates. These candidates generally do not have obligations to party bosses or quid pro quo relationships with lobbyists like the major party candidates do. Very often, we will vote for the lesser of two evils, rather than an independent or third party candidate who might be much better. Of course, when you vote for the lesser of two evils, you're still voting for an evil. Many people feel like they would be wasting their vote by voting for any of those other candidates. This is simply not true. A voter only wastes his/her vote when he/she votes for someone he/she does not really like. Instead, we create a voting catch-22 for ourselves, i.e., no one will vote for Mr. Independent because he has no chance; Mr. Independent has no chance because no one will vote for him. If enough people decided to start voting their conscience, we could break that vicious cycle.
Terry Mitchell is a software engineer, freelance writer, and trivia buff from Hopewell, VA. He also serves as a political columnist for American Daily and operates his own website - http://www.commenterry.com - on which he posts commentaries on various subjects such as politics, technology, religion, health and well-being, personal finance, and sports. His commentaries offer a unique point of view that is not often found in mainstream media.
insured cleaning company Deerfield ..Expected new applications for Mexican trucks to enter the US... Read More
[Author's Note: Another essay that I wrote on notebook paper... Read More
A visitor to Moscow would be immediately struck by the... Read More
Policemen in many US cities are taking their new authority... Read More
If recent speeches by US officials on Iran's plans to... Read More
Many times our government regulatory over embellish problems in the... Read More
We should all give much kudos to the Federal Trade... Read More
The official figures are staggering: 35% of the workforce -... Read More
We are destroying our freedoms and slowing innovation, due to... Read More
The shouting is over and directions for the next four... Read More
I am noticing an increasing and alarming rate to which... Read More
There are so many problems with our perceived perfect checks... Read More
The current field of political sciences is dominated by a... Read More
Conor MacDari was a Mason but his Masonry deplored the... Read More
A coffee shop conversation about a Great Country in Historic... Read More
Every conflict has its economic moments and dimensions. The current... Read More
It cities across America water is an issue, the flow... Read More
Political strategists, branding gurus and image consultants could learn a... Read More
Our government is set up like a modern day franchise.... Read More
Q. Should the Government be concerned if the CPI rises... Read More
Here is an interesting thought; Corn to make Plastic An... Read More
As you know Delta Airlines is close to bankruptcy. Their... Read More
I just got done reading a series of articles dating... Read More
When we go through periods of droughts we also have... Read More
As pictures and videos surface showing young American soldiers humiliating... Read More
top rated cleaning service Bannockburn ..Many folks who are pro-NASA and Pro-Space Colonies say that... Read More
The recent scathing remarks by High Court Judge Richard Mawrey... Read More
It appears the Feds are suing Elliot Spitzer over his... Read More
It can be dangerous to engage in free speech. This... Read More
Recently in Maine, I talked with a gentleman and we... Read More
THE ECCLESIASTICAL GRANT:There are good things done by the hegemony.... Read More
The cause of America is in a great measure the... Read More
Many very nice and loving homosexual male couples want to... Read More
Those who are above the law or act as such... Read More
For many years now, I have been the proud holder... Read More
The People's Liberation Army of China invaded Tibet in 1949.... Read More
The TSA seems to have completely missed the ball at... Read More
Non-lethal Goo Concepts have been tossed around by many war... Read More
I was dismayed to learn the other day, that my... Read More
We are currently seeing a build up in China of... Read More
Fifteen hours is a tremendous barrier. It is the obstacle... Read More
It never fails to amaze me. HM Customs and Excise... Read More
Is Starbucks a monopoly? It fits all the definitions. Does... Read More
Peace in the Middle East - whoa that is a... Read More
Let's make one thing clear: This Dan Nelson Automotive fiasco... Read More
Journalism, as it is often said, is the 'fourth branch... Read More
Recently I met a man in a coffee shop, a... Read More
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development issued a report... Read More
Land Mines have been one of the most evil left... Read More
Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, has... Read More
Political |