When I was growing up, I actually considered a career in politics. I quickly changed my mind, though, when I discovered that there was way too much politics involved in it. Obviously, that's a play on words, but I get funny looks from people when I tell them that. However, I am completely serious. The politics of running for and holding elective office is influenced too much by the politics of power, influence, and money. But whose fault is it that such a condition exists? I believe voters have no one to blame but themselves.
As a voting public, we have become entirely too sophisticated for our own good. Many of us have made a habit of voting pragmatically, i.e., voting for the person we think has the best chance to win instead of the person we most agree with. We complain about wishy-washy politicians who won't give us straight answers, yet when people who say what they really think run for office, we dismiss them as being "loose cannons." When any candidate makes a statement that's evenly slightly out of the mainstream, it is considered such an egregious act that he or she either becomes marginalized or is forced to drop out of the race. What's left is a bunch of cautious and robotic weenies with their fingers in the wind - people who form their decisions based on polls and focus groups.
We say we want candidates who are different, but not too different. We say we want new ideas but we shun candidates that seem the least bit precocious. Therefore, we end up with the kinds of candidates we've always had.
I've often heard voters comment on candidates by making statements like "I couldn't imagine her being elected" or "he sends shivers down my spine." Most people will automatically exclude any candidate who would fit those kinds of descriptions. But should they? Sometimes good candidates come in packages that might be a little different or even a bit scary. By disqualifying those types of candidates, we could be missing out on some potentially great leaders. I wonder how many of today's sophisticated voters would consider someone like Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, or Teddy Roosevelt too much of a "nut" to be elected.
We like to say the issues are the important things to us. However, many of us vote based on personalities. For example, we will decide on a presidential candidate based on who seems the most "presidential" (whatever that means). We are also too concerned about meaningless ceremonial issues. For example, I bet some people wouldn't vote for an unmarried man for president because of their concern about the absence of a first lady. We also put too great of an emphasis on superficial issues such as aesthetics, i.e., how someone looks. Richard Nixon may have lost the 1960 election because he didn't look as good on TV as John F. Kennedy during their debate.
We also stress a candidate's education a little too much. Education is important, but it's not everything. Some of smartest people in the world never attended college. However, many of us wouldn't consider someone for any office higher than dog catcher unless he or she had at least a Bachelor's degree.
Many voters make their ballot selections based on personal greed instead of what's best for their country, state, district, or locality. They will reserve their votes for politicians whom they think will give them things and/or make life easier for them. Of course, Politicians constantly exploit this greed by making outlandish promises. Once these politicians are elected, they either have to renege on those promises or create budget deficits in order to bring them about.
Other voters, while not so much motivated by personal greed, will vote based on localized interests at the expense of the more general interests. For example, they might vote for a particular congressional candidate because they think he will bring a lot of goodies to their district. This mentality also helps to forge a cycle of promises, broken promises, and budget deficits. Until voters begin to put the general good ahead of personal and parochial interests, these problems will persist.
We like to blame the news media for all of the "gotcha" political stories that pry too deeply into the personal lives and distant past history of candidates and therefore keep many good and qualified people out the political arena. However, it is ultimately our fault because we eat that stuff up. We can't get enough of it. The more dirt the news outlets dig up on various candidates, the more we buy their newspapers and tune in to their TV and radio stations for more of those stories. The sad part is that we allow that stuff to influence our votes. Most of it is irrelevant to the issues at hand and should not be taken seriously by voters. We do usually ignore the parts about the candidates or parties we like, but we tend to believe the parts about the candidates or parties we don't like. Therefore, the news media keeps feeding us this garbage.
Last but not least, one of our biggest problems is our unwillingness to vote for independent or third party candidates. These candidates generally do not have obligations to party bosses or quid pro quo relationships with lobbyists like the major party candidates do. Very often, we will vote for the lesser of two evils, rather than an independent or third party candidate who might be much better. Of course, when you vote for the lesser of two evils, you're still voting for an evil. Many people feel like they would be wasting their vote by voting for any of those other candidates. This is simply not true. A voter only wastes his/her vote when he/she votes for someone he/she does not really like. Instead, we create a voting catch-22 for ourselves, i.e., no one will vote for Mr. Independent because he has no chance; Mr. Independent has no chance because no one will vote for him. If enough people decided to start voting their conscience, we could break that vicious cycle.
Terry Mitchell is a software engineer, freelance writer, and trivia buff from Hopewell, VA. He also serves as a political columnist for American Daily and operates his own website - http://www.commenterry.com - on which he posts commentaries on various subjects such as politics, technology, religion, health and well-being, personal finance, and sports. His commentaries offer a unique point of view that is not often found in mainstream media.
Mokena prom limo .. Lockport Chicago limo O’HareCorporate America has been shaken recently by lawsuits and criminal... Read More
We have brain drain issues in Silicon Valley, we have... Read More
In the last two weeks, two non-senior US officials indirectly... Read More
The first reaction of economies in transition is a sharp... Read More
A visitor to Moscow would be immediately struck by the... Read More
Since the court case was over turned against Arthur Anderson... Read More
The current political efforts aimed at improving the American public... Read More
Fuel costs seem to rank high in surveys of US... Read More
-The Protocol plan 'will remain invisible until the moment when... Read More
With gasoline prices at the pump climbing strongly into the... Read More
Policemen in many US cities are taking their new authority... Read More
How can any human being today, anywhere in this world,... Read More
Every conflict has its economic moments and dimensions. The current... Read More
One way to increase evaporation in the ocean might be... Read More
Introduction:Although politicians and so-called "Intelligence Experts" are the ones appearing... Read More
China is serious about breaking into the bio-tech field and... Read More
As you can see from some of our previous articles,... Read More
Ever wonder why labor unions consistently endorse democrats over republicans... Read More
The TSA seems to have completely missed the ball at... Read More
Last week, the media coverage called the airplane crash in... Read More
If slavery has not worked well, then cloning if it... Read More
Up until the final debate at Arizona State University, the... Read More
In response to Douglas Bower's article; Logic Class 101 Applied... Read More
We should all give much kudos to the Federal Trade... Read More
The blogosphere has been jumping around the story like crazy... Read More
Mokena Chicago limo O'Hare ..The idea that the majority shows the will of the... Read More
The great leader and Senator from New York and wife... Read More
I have witnessed a new era of security in the... Read More
Is the only way to fight Fundamentalist Extremists becoming one... Read More
As the death toll in the avalanche-hit Jammu and Kashmir... Read More
Up until the final debate at Arizona State University, the... Read More
Have you noticed that the when the service men who... Read More
I applaud Monsanto for their R and D. I would... Read More
Many of the problems that the members of the European... Read More
China maybe stopping some of the SPAM coming into the... Read More
When were the forms of media created? When did advertising... Read More
Nothing could be more alarming for Americans than what I... Read More
Hello! Happy new year. May you live a long healthy... Read More
All UAVs Need a Self Destruct BLOS DeviceWhat do you... Read More
Land Mines have been one of the most evil left... Read More
Since the court case was over turned against Arthur Anderson... Read More
All to often law makers and regulators create rules and... Read More
The current field of political sciences is dominated by a... Read More
I. OVERVIEWIn the wake of the September 11 terrorist attacks... Read More
After the dance the piper must be paid. To help... Read More
Why did FDR say Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and Count... Read More
America must implement a policy on Election Reform that is... Read More
The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) estimated that there were... Read More
All the indicators show an improving economy and, finally, the... Read More
The Carl Rove issue is definitely interesting and distracting. The... Read More
Political |