When I was growing up, I actually considered a career in politics. I quickly changed my mind, though, when I discovered that there was way too much politics involved in it. Obviously, that's a play on words, but I get funny looks from people when I tell them that. However, I am completely serious. The politics of running for and holding elective office is influenced too much by the politics of power, influence, and money. But whose fault is it that such a condition exists? I believe voters have no one to blame but themselves.
As a voting public, we have become entirely too sophisticated for our own good. Many of us have made a habit of voting pragmatically, i.e., voting for the person we think has the best chance to win instead of the person we most agree with. We complain about wishy-washy politicians who won't give us straight answers, yet when people who say what they really think run for office, we dismiss them as being "loose cannons." When any candidate makes a statement that's evenly slightly out of the mainstream, it is considered such an egregious act that he or she either becomes marginalized or is forced to drop out of the race. What's left is a bunch of cautious and robotic weenies with their fingers in the wind - people who form their decisions based on polls and focus groups.
We say we want candidates who are different, but not too different. We say we want new ideas but we shun candidates that seem the least bit precocious. Therefore, we end up with the kinds of candidates we've always had.
I've often heard voters comment on candidates by making statements like "I couldn't imagine her being elected" or "he sends shivers down my spine." Most people will automatically exclude any candidate who would fit those kinds of descriptions. But should they? Sometimes good candidates come in packages that might be a little different or even a bit scary. By disqualifying those types of candidates, we could be missing out on some potentially great leaders. I wonder how many of today's sophisticated voters would consider someone like Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, or Teddy Roosevelt too much of a "nut" to be elected.
We like to say the issues are the important things to us. However, many of us vote based on personalities. For example, we will decide on a presidential candidate based on who seems the most "presidential" (whatever that means). We are also too concerned about meaningless ceremonial issues. For example, I bet some people wouldn't vote for an unmarried man for president because of their concern about the absence of a first lady. We also put too great of an emphasis on superficial issues such as aesthetics, i.e., how someone looks. Richard Nixon may have lost the 1960 election because he didn't look as good on TV as John F. Kennedy during their debate.
We also stress a candidate's education a little too much. Education is important, but it's not everything. Some of smartest people in the world never attended college. However, many of us wouldn't consider someone for any office higher than dog catcher unless he or she had at least a Bachelor's degree.
Many voters make their ballot selections based on personal greed instead of what's best for their country, state, district, or locality. They will reserve their votes for politicians whom they think will give them things and/or make life easier for them. Of course, Politicians constantly exploit this greed by making outlandish promises. Once these politicians are elected, they either have to renege on those promises or create budget deficits in order to bring them about.
Other voters, while not so much motivated by personal greed, will vote based on localized interests at the expense of the more general interests. For example, they might vote for a particular congressional candidate because they think he will bring a lot of goodies to their district. This mentality also helps to forge a cycle of promises, broken promises, and budget deficits. Until voters begin to put the general good ahead of personal and parochial interests, these problems will persist.
We like to blame the news media for all of the "gotcha" political stories that pry too deeply into the personal lives and distant past history of candidates and therefore keep many good and qualified people out the political arena. However, it is ultimately our fault because we eat that stuff up. We can't get enough of it. The more dirt the news outlets dig up on various candidates, the more we buy their newspapers and tune in to their TV and radio stations for more of those stories. The sad part is that we allow that stuff to influence our votes. Most of it is irrelevant to the issues at hand and should not be taken seriously by voters. We do usually ignore the parts about the candidates or parties we like, but we tend to believe the parts about the candidates or parties we don't like. Therefore, the news media keeps feeding us this garbage.
Last but not least, one of our biggest problems is our unwillingness to vote for independent or third party candidates. These candidates generally do not have obligations to party bosses or quid pro quo relationships with lobbyists like the major party candidates do. Very often, we will vote for the lesser of two evils, rather than an independent or third party candidate who might be much better. Of course, when you vote for the lesser of two evils, you're still voting for an evil. Many people feel like they would be wasting their vote by voting for any of those other candidates. This is simply not true. A voter only wastes his/her vote when he/she votes for someone he/she does not really like. Instead, we create a voting catch-22 for ourselves, i.e., no one will vote for Mr. Independent because he has no chance; Mr. Independent has no chance because no one will vote for him. If enough people decided to start voting their conscience, we could break that vicious cycle.
Terry Mitchell is a software engineer, freelance writer, and trivia buff from Hopewell, VA. He also serves as a political columnist for American Daily and operates his own website - http://www.commenterry.com - on which he posts commentaries on various subjects such as politics, technology, religion, health and well-being, personal finance, and sports. His commentaries offer a unique point of view that is not often found in mainstream media.
efficient cleaning crew Northbrook ..City Governments is their quest for; "quality of life" often... Read More
Why did FDR say Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and Count... Read More
Freedom is in the eyes of the beholder. In Communist... Read More
IntroductionThe way one lyrist has written, "Hum logo ko samajh... Read More
You have probably heard of the Sarbaines Oxley Law (SOX)... Read More
I am not an African-American. Don't call me an African... Read More
It looks overall like the liberals are advocating for no... Read More
UNAUTHORIZED HACKINGThe term "computer hacking" traditionally describes the penetration into... Read More
Do you really want to get ahead in your life?... Read More
I always have to remember to take a deep breath... Read More
The idea that the majority shows the will of the... Read More
The Federal Trade Commission in their latest move to increase... Read More
The more I study the dynamics of WWII the more... Read More
It appears we are having a terrible situation with the... Read More
Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter to Lafayette in 1823 that... Read More
In his bid for the presidency, John Kerry pronounced a... Read More
The United States and other first world nations have been... Read More
In an effort to assist our political leadership it would... Read More
The clause (c) of Electronic Crime Act 2004 has been... Read More
Hitler received a legacy from his Rothschild relations in Vienna... Read More
Last year a Maryland State Legislator whom I presume never... Read More
Aren't you glad you purchased Alaska? You got a bargain,... Read More
The filibuster as a political delaying tactic has been a... Read More
The head of the Club of Rome has said that... Read More
In a recent report on the status of the Franchising... Read More
cleaning lady near Wilmette ..Land Mines have been one of the most evil left... Read More
We can all see the issues involved in the cloning... Read More
Former Senator, Daniel Moynihan, accurately summed up the situation when... Read More
I like Bill O'Reilly. I do. I have read two... Read More
The Connecticut Conference of Municipalities (CCM) is interested in the... Read More
Here are some miscellaneous thoughts on issues many of which... Read More
Blessed with Chinese GDP growth rates (7-8% annually in each... Read More
Legislation is getting legs to further curtail your use of... Read More
When were the forms of media created? When did advertising... Read More
With elections on the horizon and Blair looking tired and... Read More
Let's put the religious part of the debate for a... Read More
With people living longer we have some problems as those... Read More
IT'S NO LONGER NEWS THAT CHINA IS BECOMING A MAJOR... Read More
In this day and age of tattletale, whistleblower heroes and... Read More
Airlines do not allow cell phones on board, but they... Read More
We need more oversight and transparency in government. We need... Read More
US Steel prices have cost franchisees in my company and... Read More
"Rugged individualism" is actually a euphemism for Thomas Hobbes' baseless... Read More
Journalism, as it is often said, is the 'fourth branch... Read More
California Attorneys and politicians are to blame for the energy... Read More
Many people who are expert in the issue of the... Read More
OH MAN!Here we go again. I guess now the "proof... Read More
The European Court of Justice ("ECJ") ruled in Praktiker Bau-... Read More
We know that the International Terrorists like the idea of... Read More
Without the flow of fuel our very mobile society comes... Read More
Political |