I always have to remember to take a deep breath when examining the laws being proposed by our grand Legislature. I detest most of the new legislation on the table, but have to forgive our representatives in the House and Senate for it. After all, writing laws is what a Legislature does, and if they don't write enough laws, it can begin to look like they've been loafing.
Call me strange, but I rather prefer a Legislature that goofs off and under produces new laws. I'm convinced we have enough of them already, and agree with Mark Twain, who famously said that no man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the Legislature is in session.
Mainly, that is because no lawmaker wants to look like a slacker, especially so soon after an election. It's bad form. As a result, we get some hideous proposals that I would chalk up as an effort to hide behind some broad good intention while looking meaningful, or at least busy.
House Bill 1508 is a textbook case as one such proposal.
Representative Vanessa Summers, an Indianapolis Democrat, has introduced legislation that would prohibit the use of cell phones, making exceptions for hands-free devices and for emergency use. The proposed fine for violations of the law would be up to $25.
The intent is to make our streets a little less hazardous. We have all groused at the idiot guilty of driving while in conversation that cut us off or made us miss a light, and we have cursed the driver and his cell phone. Summers' proposal takes its cue from similar laws passed in New York and the District of Columbia. As everyone knows, these cities now have the safest streets in the world.
This law is rife with problems, from practical application to the higher concerns of individual liberty.
I know four friends, right off the top of my head, who would gladly pay up to $25, as a cost of doing business. They think this highly of each and every one of their calls. $25 is no kind of deterrent for these people.
What is emergency use? I define emergency use of a cell phone as a frantic call to a friend because I suddenly had two tickets offered to me for a Colts' playoff game, and I have to accept within five minutes, or the tickets will be passed on to a co-worker. My wife defines it as having found a deal on furniture, and she's on her way home so I can look at fabric swatches. I'm betting that this is not what the Representative has in mind. Some revisions will be in order.
But why just cell phones? If the real intent of the law is to eliminate distractions from our roadways, why not ban them all? Summers could justifiably expand the proposal to include a ban on smoking in the car, adjusting the radio or inserting a Britney Spears CD, eating fast food, scolding the rug rats in the backseat, talking with your spouse, shaving or applying makeup, doing the crossword puzzle, using a laptop computer, calling for on-screen directions to Starbucks, and rehearsing your excuse that explains your tardiness to the boss.
Could we really ban Britney Spears CDs? I digress.
Before the law is done with revisions, no common person will be able to read and understand it, and mainly, drivers will just continue to take their chances.
This begs the significant philosophical question: Why bother?
Isn't it sufficient that citations can already be issued if the use of a cell phone is the cause of an accident? Why pile on? No harm, no foul: If the use of a cell phone isn't endangering anyone in the moment, why penalize for the harm that was not caused?
Ah, the law is to be a deterrent, to eliminate the possibility of harm. But won't it also become more than that? How much of a stretch is it to envision police pulling over drivers who endanger nobody on a deserted road at 11pm, but who are guilty of making a cell call, just so the officer can meet his monthly quota? Isn't that a harm all its own?
Say, if the police pull a driver over to the side of the road, isn't that the sort of distraction that could cause an accident? It should be banned!
Let's hope this Bill dies in committee. If it passes, Summers will run for re-election in 2006 on the basis of having produced this wonderful law? and of having been suitably busy.
Mike Kole is chair of the Libertarian Party of Hamilton County (Noblesville) and candidate for Secretary of State (2006).
Libertarian Writers' Bureau http://www.writersbureau.org
local house cleaners Park Ridge ..I heard on the news this week how America continues... Read More
This, of course, is a political decision. There is no... Read More
If a farmer plants the same crop three seasons in... Read More
If we go hog wild towards the liberal agenda where... Read More
There is debate about the methodology of forestry and also... Read More
When you look at the news, immigrants are dying trying... Read More
With respect to the States' databases, you may not locate... Read More
From the National Association of Realtors' Virtual Office Website policy,... Read More
Currently the United States has weapons, which can shoot around... Read More
Federal Trade Commission Owes Industry and Entrepreneurs an Apology. The... Read More
There are many issues on the minds of US voters... Read More
There are many mines around the world, which are owned... Read More
ADOLF HITLER:The common perception of Hitler being large and in... Read More
The organic farmers are angry that Monsantos terminator GM seeds... Read More
The plight of whistleblowers ? those employees who sound the... Read More
Many folks who are pro-NASA and Pro-Space Colonies say that... Read More
I'm getting a little tired of being lectured by that... Read More
Many people who are expert in the issue of the... Read More
"Like humans void of soul or mind, they jeered and... Read More
With the world's largest oil and natural gas reserves, second... Read More
WE MUST PUT A STOP TO THE EVER-INCREASING PRICE OF... Read More
Regarding the de-regulation of energy, this is not such a... Read More
"The only time I open my mouth is when I... Read More
The newest pebble reactors are easy to build and manage... Read More
Question: Dr. Vaknin ? is it true that you are... Read More
move out cleaning service Glenview ..As concerns grow over the threat of bioterrorism and weapons... Read More
Any chances for a country to be ruled by alternative... Read More
In a move that rocked the online world and left... Read More
What has really changed in the housing market with regards... Read More
Peace in the Middle East - whoa that is a... Read More
President Bush and Secretary Powell should hang their heads in... Read More
Many environmentalists are against roads through the forest because it... Read More
..."history may judge us to be the real bully if,... Read More
Well many have complained that the FBI and CIA dropped... Read More
President George W. Bush has unofficially won his re-election bid... Read More
The price at the gas pump is certainly on everyone's... Read More
Federal Trade Commission Owes Industry and Entrepreneurs an Apology. The... Read More
All government regulators or diplomat who are in high risk... Read More
Why are we over regulating the franchising industry? What are... Read More
If we go hog wild towards the liberal agenda where... Read More
When were the forms of media created? When did advertising... Read More
Well, another election has come and gone in the US... Read More
Even the most devout proponents of free marketry and hidden... Read More
Regarding the issues with the Space Shuttle and the in... Read More
"Had there not been outsourcing and utilization of cheaper resources... Read More
The Republican Party became popular due to its view on... Read More
As we reel from the news of the recent bombings... Read More
Richard Nixon was by far a most fascinating and colorful... Read More
I. WARS ARE BASIC CONFLICTS OVER LAND. II. BOUNDARIES. THE... Read More
Ethanol is a great way to produce fuel, great fuel... Read More
Political |