I always have to remember to take a deep breath when examining the laws being proposed by our grand Legislature. I detest most of the new legislation on the table, but have to forgive our representatives in the House and Senate for it. After all, writing laws is what a Legislature does, and if they don't write enough laws, it can begin to look like they've been loafing.
Call me strange, but I rather prefer a Legislature that goofs off and under produces new laws. I'm convinced we have enough of them already, and agree with Mark Twain, who famously said that no man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the Legislature is in session.
Mainly, that is because no lawmaker wants to look like a slacker, especially so soon after an election. It's bad form. As a result, we get some hideous proposals that I would chalk up as an effort to hide behind some broad good intention while looking meaningful, or at least busy.
House Bill 1508 is a textbook case as one such proposal.
Representative Vanessa Summers, an Indianapolis Democrat, has introduced legislation that would prohibit the use of cell phones, making exceptions for hands-free devices and for emergency use. The proposed fine for violations of the law would be up to $25.
The intent is to make our streets a little less hazardous. We have all groused at the idiot guilty of driving while in conversation that cut us off or made us miss a light, and we have cursed the driver and his cell phone. Summers' proposal takes its cue from similar laws passed in New York and the District of Columbia. As everyone knows, these cities now have the safest streets in the world.
This law is rife with problems, from practical application to the higher concerns of individual liberty.
I know four friends, right off the top of my head, who would gladly pay up to $25, as a cost of doing business. They think this highly of each and every one of their calls. $25 is no kind of deterrent for these people.
What is emergency use? I define emergency use of a cell phone as a frantic call to a friend because I suddenly had two tickets offered to me for a Colts' playoff game, and I have to accept within five minutes, or the tickets will be passed on to a co-worker. My wife defines it as having found a deal on furniture, and she's on her way home so I can look at fabric swatches. I'm betting that this is not what the Representative has in mind. Some revisions will be in order.
But why just cell phones? If the real intent of the law is to eliminate distractions from our roadways, why not ban them all? Summers could justifiably expand the proposal to include a ban on smoking in the car, adjusting the radio or inserting a Britney Spears CD, eating fast food, scolding the rug rats in the backseat, talking with your spouse, shaving or applying makeup, doing the crossword puzzle, using a laptop computer, calling for on-screen directions to Starbucks, and rehearsing your excuse that explains your tardiness to the boss.
Could we really ban Britney Spears CDs? I digress.
Before the law is done with revisions, no common person will be able to read and understand it, and mainly, drivers will just continue to take their chances.
This begs the significant philosophical question: Why bother?
Isn't it sufficient that citations can already be issued if the use of a cell phone is the cause of an accident? Why pile on? No harm, no foul: If the use of a cell phone isn't endangering anyone in the moment, why penalize for the harm that was not caused?
Ah, the law is to be a deterrent, to eliminate the possibility of harm. But won't it also become more than that? How much of a stretch is it to envision police pulling over drivers who endanger nobody on a deserted road at 11pm, but who are guilty of making a cell call, just so the officer can meet his monthly quota? Isn't that a harm all its own?
Say, if the police pull a driver over to the side of the road, isn't that the sort of distraction that could cause an accident? It should be banned!
Let's hope this Bill dies in committee. If it passes, Summers will run for re-election in 2006 on the basis of having produced this wonderful law? and of having been suitably busy.
Mike Kole is chair of the Libertarian Party of Hamilton County (Noblesville) and candidate for Secretary of State (2006).
Libertarian Writers' Bureau http://www.writersbureau.org
apartment cleaning near Highland Park ..The United States has never done a full study on... Read More
We know that in Maryland, which some call "Merry Land"... Read More
Sarbaines Oxley was probably the easiest way to destroy free... Read More
If someone wanted to farm future clones they would need... Read More
[Author's Note: Another essay that I wrote on notebook paper... Read More
Why is it that every single thing government does; it... Read More
When you see hooded Klansmen walking up Pennsylvania Avenue to... Read More
Heavens, what are we up against? It seems these days... Read More
One way to increase evaporation in the ocean might be... Read More
Well, another election has come and gone in the US... Read More
1. Why is it that no one seems to notice,... Read More
In Belarus parliament is going to struggle with degeneration of... Read More
As you know Delta Airlines is close to bankruptcy. Their... Read More
The shouting is over and directions for the next four... Read More
"Rugged individualism" is actually a euphemism for Thomas Hobbes' baseless... Read More
The United States and other first world nations have been... Read More
Leave it to the Columbia City Police Officers Association in... Read More
Water Conservation in larger cities is less of an issue... Read More
The use of homosexual men in the area of espionage... Read More
We need a government that can be as responsive to... Read More
When I was growing up, I actually considered a career... Read More
In the event of that a threatening nation to the... Read More
Well we have certainly been reading a lot about prison... Read More
Even the most devout proponents of free marketry and hidden... Read More
In the most rewarding new industries, there is often a... Read More
cleaning lady near Arlington Heights ..Many times our government regulatory over embellish problems in the... Read More
The new law "Special Protective, Antidumping and Import Compensatory Measures"... Read More
We know we can cloak a giant airship from those... Read More
The Federal trade Commission has a rule, which says that... Read More
Why did FDR say Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and Count... Read More
They do not allow the criticism of the president in... Read More
Farmers will eventually be facing federal regulations involving air emissions... Read More
With respect to the States' databases, you may not locate... Read More
A coffee shop conversation about a Great Country in Historic... Read More
The US Homeland Security is worried about Hydrofoil or Skimmer... Read More
Let's put the religious part of the debate for a... Read More
Why President Bush should have his second term? The arguments... Read More
-The Protocol plan 'will remain invisible until the moment when... Read More
Aren't you glad you purchased Alaska? You got a bargain,... Read More
An article in Information Week in January 14, 2002 discussed... Read More
In many reports we see that the Federal Trade Commission... Read More
Our Airports have excess capacity, which is not being used... Read More
I always have to remember to take a deep breath... Read More
As pictures and videos surface showing young American soldiers humiliating... Read More
While many Pennsylvanians are struggling to figure out how they... Read More
Will a bus running across the borders bring cordial relations... Read More
Rule of Thumb for exporting technology. The American People need... Read More
Where are all the high-speed trains we were promised? Where... Read More
I like Bill O'Reilly. I do. I have read two... Read More
The trade deficit with Canada is now 50 Billion per... Read More
Political |