I always have to remember to take a deep breath when examining the laws being proposed by our grand Legislature. I detest most of the new legislation on the table, but have to forgive our representatives in the House and Senate for it. After all, writing laws is what a Legislature does, and if they don't write enough laws, it can begin to look like they've been loafing.
Call me strange, but I rather prefer a Legislature that goofs off and under produces new laws. I'm convinced we have enough of them already, and agree with Mark Twain, who famously said that no man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the Legislature is in session.
Mainly, that is because no lawmaker wants to look like a slacker, especially so soon after an election. It's bad form. As a result, we get some hideous proposals that I would chalk up as an effort to hide behind some broad good intention while looking meaningful, or at least busy.
House Bill 1508 is a textbook case as one such proposal.
Representative Vanessa Summers, an Indianapolis Democrat, has introduced legislation that would prohibit the use of cell phones, making exceptions for hands-free devices and for emergency use. The proposed fine for violations of the law would be up to $25.
The intent is to make our streets a little less hazardous. We have all groused at the idiot guilty of driving while in conversation that cut us off or made us miss a light, and we have cursed the driver and his cell phone. Summers' proposal takes its cue from similar laws passed in New York and the District of Columbia. As everyone knows, these cities now have the safest streets in the world.
This law is rife with problems, from practical application to the higher concerns of individual liberty.
I know four friends, right off the top of my head, who would gladly pay up to $25, as a cost of doing business. They think this highly of each and every one of their calls. $25 is no kind of deterrent for these people.
What is emergency use? I define emergency use of a cell phone as a frantic call to a friend because I suddenly had two tickets offered to me for a Colts' playoff game, and I have to accept within five minutes, or the tickets will be passed on to a co-worker. My wife defines it as having found a deal on furniture, and she's on her way home so I can look at fabric swatches. I'm betting that this is not what the Representative has in mind. Some revisions will be in order.
But why just cell phones? If the real intent of the law is to eliminate distractions from our roadways, why not ban them all? Summers could justifiably expand the proposal to include a ban on smoking in the car, adjusting the radio or inserting a Britney Spears CD, eating fast food, scolding the rug rats in the backseat, talking with your spouse, shaving or applying makeup, doing the crossword puzzle, using a laptop computer, calling for on-screen directions to Starbucks, and rehearsing your excuse that explains your tardiness to the boss.
Could we really ban Britney Spears CDs? I digress.
Before the law is done with revisions, no common person will be able to read and understand it, and mainly, drivers will just continue to take their chances.
This begs the significant philosophical question: Why bother?
Isn't it sufficient that citations can already be issued if the use of a cell phone is the cause of an accident? Why pile on? No harm, no foul: If the use of a cell phone isn't endangering anyone in the moment, why penalize for the harm that was not caused?
Ah, the law is to be a deterrent, to eliminate the possibility of harm. But won't it also become more than that? How much of a stretch is it to envision police pulling over drivers who endanger nobody on a deserted road at 11pm, but who are guilty of making a cell call, just so the officer can meet his monthly quota? Isn't that a harm all its own?
Say, if the police pull a driver over to the side of the road, isn't that the sort of distraction that could cause an accident? It should be banned!
Let's hope this Bill dies in committee. If it passes, Summers will run for re-election in 2006 on the basis of having produced this wonderful law? and of having been suitably busy.
Mike Kole is chair of the Libertarian Party of Hamilton County (Noblesville) and candidate for Secretary of State (2006).
Libertarian Writers' Bureau http://www.writersbureau.org
same day cleaning service Bannockburn ..In order to win the presidency in America, candidates must... Read More
As pictures and videos surface showing young American soldiers humiliating... Read More
Much of our personal and cultural perspective on the world... Read More
Hello! Happy new year. May you live a long healthy... Read More
As of late steroid use in sports has been the... Read More
From the comfort of their plush offices and five to... Read More
The clause (c) of Electronic Crime Act 2004 has been... Read More
Currently the United States has weapons, which can shoot around... Read More
A few hours ago, Colonel Ely Ould Mohamed Vall, the... Read More
While many Pennsylvanians are struggling to figure out how they... Read More
Let's put the religious part of the debate for a... Read More
Continued thoughts while driving down the road in a huge... Read More
It looks overall like the liberals are advocating for no... Read More
Airlines do not allow cell phones on board, but they... Read More
Year Item Price Rate of Inflation 03/80 Gasoline (per gallon)... Read More
Prison guards and corrections professionals are hard at work insuring... Read More
In this day and age of tattletale, whistleblower heroes and... Read More
Many folks who are pro-NASA and Pro-Space Colonies say that... Read More
The United States is losing its industrial capacity quite rapidly.... Read More
Having redundancies and today's technologies in transportation we have protected... Read More
Everyone knows the United States Government often falls down in... Read More
If we go hog wild towards the liberal agenda where... Read More
Bosnia-Herzegovina (heretofore "Bosnia") is an artificial polity with four, tangentially... Read More
As we watch fewer Americans voting it is no wonder... Read More
Federal Trade Commission Owes Industry and Entrepreneurs an Apology. The... Read More
housekeepers near Deerfield ..With people living longer we have some problems as those... Read More
We should all give much kudos to the Federal Trade... Read More
What ordinary people are saying about U.S. televangelist Pat Robertson... Read More
The newest pebble reactors are easy to build and manage... Read More
Wealth Distribution is often discussed at length in periodicals such... Read More
I, too, am saddened by the disaster in New Orleans... Read More
Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Men desire power. Give power to... Read More
Peace in the Middle East - whoa that is a... Read More
I propose a special Projection Device code-named: "TIPED". This system... Read More
Recently the CIA staged a practice simulation of a cyber... Read More
Why are we over regulating the franchising industry? What are... Read More
Rule of Thumb for exporting technology. The American People need... Read More
Amnesty International comments on the proposal that has been laid... Read More
The more I study the dynamics of WWII the more... Read More
Osama bin Laden probably needs to get a pay raise,... Read More
Conventional warfare is getting to its limits. Soon wars will... Read More
The Bill of Rights to our Constitution caused -- and... Read More
The Second World War was the continuation of World War... Read More
Recent international wars and the often spectacular ways in which... Read More
Presently Universities and Private Enterprise are working to build more... Read More
The Jihad against the Western World will continue. It will... Read More
As we increase our populations every new soul will require... Read More
You have in front of you two buttons, one is... Read More
Perhaps a silent revolution is taking place, this time more... Read More
The North American Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was implemented on January... Read More
Political |