I always have to remember to take a deep breath when examining the laws being proposed by our grand Legislature. I detest most of the new legislation on the table, but have to forgive our representatives in the House and Senate for it. After all, writing laws is what a Legislature does, and if they don't write enough laws, it can begin to look like they've been loafing.
Call me strange, but I rather prefer a Legislature that goofs off and under produces new laws. I'm convinced we have enough of them already, and agree with Mark Twain, who famously said that no man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the Legislature is in session.
Mainly, that is because no lawmaker wants to look like a slacker, especially so soon after an election. It's bad form. As a result, we get some hideous proposals that I would chalk up as an effort to hide behind some broad good intention while looking meaningful, or at least busy.
House Bill 1508 is a textbook case as one such proposal.
Representative Vanessa Summers, an Indianapolis Democrat, has introduced legislation that would prohibit the use of cell phones, making exceptions for hands-free devices and for emergency use. The proposed fine for violations of the law would be up to $25.
The intent is to make our streets a little less hazardous. We have all groused at the idiot guilty of driving while in conversation that cut us off or made us miss a light, and we have cursed the driver and his cell phone. Summers' proposal takes its cue from similar laws passed in New York and the District of Columbia. As everyone knows, these cities now have the safest streets in the world.
This law is rife with problems, from practical application to the higher concerns of individual liberty.
I know four friends, right off the top of my head, who would gladly pay up to $25, as a cost of doing business. They think this highly of each and every one of their calls. $25 is no kind of deterrent for these people.
What is emergency use? I define emergency use of a cell phone as a frantic call to a friend because I suddenly had two tickets offered to me for a Colts' playoff game, and I have to accept within five minutes, or the tickets will be passed on to a co-worker. My wife defines it as having found a deal on furniture, and she's on her way home so I can look at fabric swatches. I'm betting that this is not what the Representative has in mind. Some revisions will be in order.
But why just cell phones? If the real intent of the law is to eliminate distractions from our roadways, why not ban them all? Summers could justifiably expand the proposal to include a ban on smoking in the car, adjusting the radio or inserting a Britney Spears CD, eating fast food, scolding the rug rats in the backseat, talking with your spouse, shaving or applying makeup, doing the crossword puzzle, using a laptop computer, calling for on-screen directions to Starbucks, and rehearsing your excuse that explains your tardiness to the boss.
Could we really ban Britney Spears CDs? I digress.
Before the law is done with revisions, no common person will be able to read and understand it, and mainly, drivers will just continue to take their chances.
This begs the significant philosophical question: Why bother?
Isn't it sufficient that citations can already be issued if the use of a cell phone is the cause of an accident? Why pile on? No harm, no foul: If the use of a cell phone isn't endangering anyone in the moment, why penalize for the harm that was not caused?
Ah, the law is to be a deterrent, to eliminate the possibility of harm. But won't it also become more than that? How much of a stretch is it to envision police pulling over drivers who endanger nobody on a deserted road at 11pm, but who are guilty of making a cell call, just so the officer can meet his monthly quota? Isn't that a harm all its own?
Say, if the police pull a driver over to the side of the road, isn't that the sort of distraction that could cause an accident? It should be banned!
Let's hope this Bill dies in committee. If it passes, Summers will run for re-election in 2006 on the basis of having produced this wonderful law? and of having been suitably busy.
Mike Kole is chair of the Libertarian Party of Hamilton County (Noblesville) and candidate for Secretary of State (2006).
Libertarian Writers' Bureau http://www.writersbureau.org
cheap limo Warrenville .. Lockport Chicago limo O’HareCorporate America has been shaken recently by lawsuits and criminal... Read More
Environmentalists say GM Seeds are bad for the environment, dangerous... Read More
Recently the FTC, Federal Trade Commission put forth a report... Read More
The end of another election once again brings into focus... Read More
Many of those who wish to fight for our country... Read More
Why did FDR say Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and Count... Read More
We can all see the issues involved in the cloning... Read More
The devastating loss in case of Elliot Spitzer for NY... Read More
Well the title is absolute Bull Crap, but this article... Read More
All the indicators show an improving economy and, finally, the... Read More
Close to 500,000 people - one in four - live... Read More
The paper industry in the US is hurting. Due to... Read More
As you can see from some of our previous articles,... Read More
Every conflict has its economic moments and dimensions. The current... Read More
Rufus King: (Said to be the fifth most important person... Read More
You say, you want to help the Palestinians, but most... Read More
In 1966, Dr. Carroll Quigley, a professor of history at... Read More
I'm starting to feel squeezed by all the political correctness... Read More
Perhaps we should have printers with ink which has metallic... Read More
Having redundancies and today's technologies in transportation we have protected... Read More
Kudos goes out to the George Walker Bush's Administration and... Read More
In many reports we see that the Federal Trade Commission... Read More
"Rugged individualism" is actually a euphemism for Thomas Hobbes' baseless... Read More
The United States has enemies, which call the country the... Read More
Are the junior attorneys in the Attorney General's office leaving... Read More
Sleepy Hollow charter limousine service ..In these times when states are suffering extreme downward pressure... Read More
A few hours ago, Colonel Ely Ould Mohamed Vall, the... Read More
Clint Eastwood recently plunged into the murky political pond with... Read More
Some people say that we cannot put a colony on... Read More
Many are condemning the latest GM Terminator seeds. Yet there... Read More
The current field of political sciences is dominated by a... Read More
The expertise and advancement of the evolution of man and... Read More
America has some monetary issues, which need to be addressed.... Read More
Streamlining Homeland Security with a Free market flair? An idea... Read More
Which companies are most affected by fuel? Who really bears... Read More
Many people who are expert in the issue of the... Read More
Airlines do not allow cell phones on board, but they... Read More
Michael Moore asserts the following in his political film Fahrenheit... Read More
Prosecutors with political ambitions are known to modify the truth... Read More
I just got done reading a series of articles dating... Read More
Washington DC council member David Catania actually suggested that the... Read More
China is serious about breaking into the bio-tech field and... Read More
The CBR taxes the Pakistani source income of nonresident individuals... Read More
The Second World War was the continuation of World War... Read More
How much oil can travel through a pipeline? It depends... Read More
As concerns grow over the threat of bioterrorism and weapons... Read More
In many reports we see that the Federal Trade Commission... Read More
The more I study the dynamics of WWII the more... Read More
Why are intelligent people so afraid of the idea that... Read More
Leave it to the Columbia City Police Officers Association in... Read More
Political |