I always have to remember to take a deep breath when examining the laws being proposed by our grand Legislature. I detest most of the new legislation on the table, but have to forgive our representatives in the House and Senate for it. After all, writing laws is what a Legislature does, and if they don't write enough laws, it can begin to look like they've been loafing.
Call me strange, but I rather prefer a Legislature that goofs off and under produces new laws. I'm convinced we have enough of them already, and agree with Mark Twain, who famously said that no man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the Legislature is in session.
Mainly, that is because no lawmaker wants to look like a slacker, especially so soon after an election. It's bad form. As a result, we get some hideous proposals that I would chalk up as an effort to hide behind some broad good intention while looking meaningful, or at least busy.
House Bill 1508 is a textbook case as one such proposal.
Representative Vanessa Summers, an Indianapolis Democrat, has introduced legislation that would prohibit the use of cell phones, making exceptions for hands-free devices and for emergency use. The proposed fine for violations of the law would be up to $25.
The intent is to make our streets a little less hazardous. We have all groused at the idiot guilty of driving while in conversation that cut us off or made us miss a light, and we have cursed the driver and his cell phone. Summers' proposal takes its cue from similar laws passed in New York and the District of Columbia. As everyone knows, these cities now have the safest streets in the world.
This law is rife with problems, from practical application to the higher concerns of individual liberty.
I know four friends, right off the top of my head, who would gladly pay up to $25, as a cost of doing business. They think this highly of each and every one of their calls. $25 is no kind of deterrent for these people.
What is emergency use? I define emergency use of a cell phone as a frantic call to a friend because I suddenly had two tickets offered to me for a Colts' playoff game, and I have to accept within five minutes, or the tickets will be passed on to a co-worker. My wife defines it as having found a deal on furniture, and she's on her way home so I can look at fabric swatches. I'm betting that this is not what the Representative has in mind. Some revisions will be in order.
But why just cell phones? If the real intent of the law is to eliminate distractions from our roadways, why not ban them all? Summers could justifiably expand the proposal to include a ban on smoking in the car, adjusting the radio or inserting a Britney Spears CD, eating fast food, scolding the rug rats in the backseat, talking with your spouse, shaving or applying makeup, doing the crossword puzzle, using a laptop computer, calling for on-screen directions to Starbucks, and rehearsing your excuse that explains your tardiness to the boss.
Could we really ban Britney Spears CDs? I digress.
Before the law is done with revisions, no common person will be able to read and understand it, and mainly, drivers will just continue to take their chances.
This begs the significant philosophical question: Why bother?
Isn't it sufficient that citations can already be issued if the use of a cell phone is the cause of an accident? Why pile on? No harm, no foul: If the use of a cell phone isn't endangering anyone in the moment, why penalize for the harm that was not caused?
Ah, the law is to be a deterrent, to eliminate the possibility of harm. But won't it also become more than that? How much of a stretch is it to envision police pulling over drivers who endanger nobody on a deserted road at 11pm, but who are guilty of making a cell call, just so the officer can meet his monthly quota? Isn't that a harm all its own?
Say, if the police pull a driver over to the side of the road, isn't that the sort of distraction that could cause an accident? It should be banned!
Let's hope this Bill dies in committee. If it passes, Summers will run for re-election in 2006 on the basis of having produced this wonderful law? and of having been suitably busy.
Mike Kole is chair of the Libertarian Party of Hamilton County (Noblesville) and candidate for Secretary of State (2006).
Libertarian Writers' Bureau http://www.writersbureau.org
recurring cleaning service Wilmette ..Most government agencies cannot pass an audit of their expenses.... Read More
Is the Federal Trade Commission really stopping SPAM? Is the... Read More
When Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Spector exercised his right to free... Read More
Iran's objection to ratifying the International Atomic Energy Agency's Additional... Read More
The news media will regularly present views from Democratic (liberal),... Read More
The Second World War was the continuation of World War... Read More
-The Protocol plan 'will remain invisible until the moment when... Read More
Back-Dooring the CSIS:The US and Israel have admitted they back-doored... Read More
Why did FDR say Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and Count... Read More
This, of course, is a political decision. There is no... Read More
Commission for Africa (CFA), one is made to understand is... Read More
America has some monetary issues, which need to be addressed.... Read More
The partisan feuding in the U.S. Senate over federal judicial... Read More
PolicyFederal Fair Housing accessibility requirements for new multifamily buildings should... Read More
For more than a decade, you the American taxpayer have... Read More
Fuel costs seem to rank high in surveys of US... Read More
In the previous article, we described the various methods developed... Read More
The filibuster has been a tool available to U.S. Senators... Read More
A. THE PHILOSOPHY OF COMPETITIONThe aims of competition (anti-trust) laws... Read More
It appears we are getting a little bit of Sun... Read More
One way to increase evaporation in the ocean might be... Read More
Well, another election has come and gone in the US... Read More
Tonight I resigned myself to the fact that this is... Read More
The other day I was sucker punched, hoodwinked, bamboozled, had... Read More
Ever wonder why labor unions consistently endorse democrats over republicans... Read More
reliable maid service Morton Grove ..Rush is right! The government's stepped up bid to regulate... Read More
There's a new Michigan state register (at https://www.protectmichild.com/) in the... Read More
If we go hog wild towards the liberal agenda where... Read More
Year Item Price Rate of Inflation 03/80 Gasoline (per gallon)... Read More
The Carl Rove issue is definitely interesting and distracting. The... Read More
Telemarketing and DO NOT CALL lists sure made headlines, but... Read More
ADOLF HITLER:The common perception of Hitler being large and in... Read More
Many are very impressed with the NIMA (National Imagery and... Read More
Recently in Maine, I talked with a gentleman and we... Read More
If a farmer plants the same crop three seasons in... Read More
Q. Should the Government be concerned if the CPI rises... Read More
I just got done reading a series of articles dating... Read More
There are no stupid questions, only stupid people. Ask an... Read More
As a result of the conflict analysis exercise and a... Read More
SYNOD OF DRUM CEATT (494 - 5):It is interesting to... Read More
The furore in the BJP camp in India, triggered by... Read More
I read an interesting article in foreign Affairs magazine last... Read More
President Bush and Secretary Powell should hang their heads in... Read More
Well the title is absolute Bull Crap, but this article... Read More
In an age of terrorism, guerilla and total warfare the... Read More
The Jihad against the Western World will continue. It will... Read More
The newest pebble reactors are easy to build and manage... Read More
Forest Vegetation Simulations for Fire Prevention, Healthy Forest and Saving... Read More
As pictures and videos surface showing young American soldiers humiliating... Read More
I propose a special Projection Device code-named: "TIPED". This system... Read More
Political |