I always have to remember to take a deep breath when examining the laws being proposed by our grand Legislature. I detest most of the new legislation on the table, but have to forgive our representatives in the House and Senate for it. After all, writing laws is what a Legislature does, and if they don't write enough laws, it can begin to look like they've been loafing.
Call me strange, but I rather prefer a Legislature that goofs off and under produces new laws. I'm convinced we have enough of them already, and agree with Mark Twain, who famously said that no man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the Legislature is in session.
Mainly, that is because no lawmaker wants to look like a slacker, especially so soon after an election. It's bad form. As a result, we get some hideous proposals that I would chalk up as an effort to hide behind some broad good intention while looking meaningful, or at least busy.
House Bill 1508 is a textbook case as one such proposal.
Representative Vanessa Summers, an Indianapolis Democrat, has introduced legislation that would prohibit the use of cell phones, making exceptions for hands-free devices and for emergency use. The proposed fine for violations of the law would be up to $25.
The intent is to make our streets a little less hazardous. We have all groused at the idiot guilty of driving while in conversation that cut us off or made us miss a light, and we have cursed the driver and his cell phone. Summers' proposal takes its cue from similar laws passed in New York and the District of Columbia. As everyone knows, these cities now have the safest streets in the world.
This law is rife with problems, from practical application to the higher concerns of individual liberty.
I know four friends, right off the top of my head, who would gladly pay up to $25, as a cost of doing business. They think this highly of each and every one of their calls. $25 is no kind of deterrent for these people.
What is emergency use? I define emergency use of a cell phone as a frantic call to a friend because I suddenly had two tickets offered to me for a Colts' playoff game, and I have to accept within five minutes, or the tickets will be passed on to a co-worker. My wife defines it as having found a deal on furniture, and she's on her way home so I can look at fabric swatches. I'm betting that this is not what the Representative has in mind. Some revisions will be in order.
But why just cell phones? If the real intent of the law is to eliminate distractions from our roadways, why not ban them all? Summers could justifiably expand the proposal to include a ban on smoking in the car, adjusting the radio or inserting a Britney Spears CD, eating fast food, scolding the rug rats in the backseat, talking with your spouse, shaving or applying makeup, doing the crossword puzzle, using a laptop computer, calling for on-screen directions to Starbucks, and rehearsing your excuse that explains your tardiness to the boss.
Could we really ban Britney Spears CDs? I digress.
Before the law is done with revisions, no common person will be able to read and understand it, and mainly, drivers will just continue to take their chances.
This begs the significant philosophical question: Why bother?
Isn't it sufficient that citations can already be issued if the use of a cell phone is the cause of an accident? Why pile on? No harm, no foul: If the use of a cell phone isn't endangering anyone in the moment, why penalize for the harm that was not caused?
Ah, the law is to be a deterrent, to eliminate the possibility of harm. But won't it also become more than that? How much of a stretch is it to envision police pulling over drivers who endanger nobody on a deserted road at 11pm, but who are guilty of making a cell call, just so the officer can meet his monthly quota? Isn't that a harm all its own?
Say, if the police pull a driver over to the side of the road, isn't that the sort of distraction that could cause an accident? It should be banned!
Let's hope this Bill dies in committee. If it passes, Summers will run for re-election in 2006 on the basis of having produced this wonderful law? and of having been suitably busy.
Mike Kole is chair of the Libertarian Party of Hamilton County (Noblesville) and candidate for Secretary of State (2006).
Libertarian Writers' Bureau http://www.writersbureau.org
professional maid services Deerfield ..I am noticing an increasing and alarming rate to which... Read More
Land Mines have been one of the most evil left... Read More
It is amazing how the Federal Trade Commission has destroyed... Read More
Since the United States Government is promoting the whistle blower... Read More
Economy is called the dismal science because it pretends to... Read More
Legislation is getting legs to further curtail your use of... Read More
For years we've suffered under recession, prompting us to ask,... Read More
As you can see from some of our previous articles,... Read More
A War on Terrorism? Conventional war being brought on an... Read More
With the world's largest oil and natural gas reserves, second... Read More
The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) estimated that there were... Read More
"When you are right you cannot be too radical; when... Read More
The great leader and Senator from New York and wife... Read More
As pictures and videos surface showing young American soldiers humiliating... Read More
The most exciting event in Slovenia last week was when... Read More
It can be dangerous to engage in free speech. This... Read More
Federal Trade Commission Owes Industry and Entrepreneurs an Apology. The... Read More
"Those who sacrifice essential liberty for temporary safety are not... Read More
What ordinary people are saying about U.S. televangelist Pat Robertson... Read More
Many have lost faith in the government and are completely... Read More
OH MAN!Here we go again. I guess now the "proof... Read More
The American Dream is the promise to have it all... Read More
Here are some miscellaneous thoughts on issues many of which... Read More
There are no stupid questions, only stupid people. Ask an... Read More
THE ROSICRUCIAN COUNCIL OF THREE:A Thelema/OTO leader who became a... Read More
quick home cleaning Lake Forest ..The United States is losing its industrial capacity quite rapidly.... Read More
Freedom is in the eyes of the beholder. In Communist... Read More
There is a lot of debate about who made the... Read More
The idea that the majority shows the will of the... Read More
I've been thinking again. I know some of my readers... Read More
Are the junior attorneys in the Attorney General's office leaving... Read More
Political strategists, branding gurus and image consultants could learn a... Read More
Publicity is correlative to your position in the community. Seldom... Read More
Is the Federal Trade Commission really stopping SPAM? Is the... Read More
I had the benefit of getting an interview with Mr.... Read More
China maybe stopping some of the SPAM coming into the... Read More
We know that in Maryland, which some call "Merry Land"... Read More
Which companies are most affected by fuel? Who really bears... Read More
INTRODUCTIONThe aim of writing this article is to encourage the... Read More
The official working week is being reduced to 35 hours... Read More
An irresponsible Chinese General made a very telling comment recently.... Read More
The current field of political sciences is dominated by a... Read More
The civil war in Iraq seems to be much more... Read More
Conventional warfare is getting to its limits. Soon wars will... Read More
Recently the CIA staged a practice simulation of a cyber... Read More
Guides for RetailersThe regulations about marketing pearls are listed in... Read More
It is amazing how the Federal Trade Commission has destroyed... Read More
The gun control debate in America is a battle between... Read More
The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) estimated that there were... Read More
The blogosphere has been jumping around the story like crazy... Read More
Political |