I always have to remember to take a deep breath when examining the laws being proposed by our grand Legislature. I detest most of the new legislation on the table, but have to forgive our representatives in the House and Senate for it. After all, writing laws is what a Legislature does, and if they don't write enough laws, it can begin to look like they've been loafing.
Call me strange, but I rather prefer a Legislature that goofs off and under produces new laws. I'm convinced we have enough of them already, and agree with Mark Twain, who famously said that no man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the Legislature is in session.
Mainly, that is because no lawmaker wants to look like a slacker, especially so soon after an election. It's bad form. As a result, we get some hideous proposals that I would chalk up as an effort to hide behind some broad good intention while looking meaningful, or at least busy.
House Bill 1508 is a textbook case as one such proposal.
Representative Vanessa Summers, an Indianapolis Democrat, has introduced legislation that would prohibit the use of cell phones, making exceptions for hands-free devices and for emergency use. The proposed fine for violations of the law would be up to $25.
The intent is to make our streets a little less hazardous. We have all groused at the idiot guilty of driving while in conversation that cut us off or made us miss a light, and we have cursed the driver and his cell phone. Summers' proposal takes its cue from similar laws passed in New York and the District of Columbia. As everyone knows, these cities now have the safest streets in the world.
This law is rife with problems, from practical application to the higher concerns of individual liberty.
I know four friends, right off the top of my head, who would gladly pay up to $25, as a cost of doing business. They think this highly of each and every one of their calls. $25 is no kind of deterrent for these people.
What is emergency use? I define emergency use of a cell phone as a frantic call to a friend because I suddenly had two tickets offered to me for a Colts' playoff game, and I have to accept within five minutes, or the tickets will be passed on to a co-worker. My wife defines it as having found a deal on furniture, and she's on her way home so I can look at fabric swatches. I'm betting that this is not what the Representative has in mind. Some revisions will be in order.
But why just cell phones? If the real intent of the law is to eliminate distractions from our roadways, why not ban them all? Summers could justifiably expand the proposal to include a ban on smoking in the car, adjusting the radio or inserting a Britney Spears CD, eating fast food, scolding the rug rats in the backseat, talking with your spouse, shaving or applying makeup, doing the crossword puzzle, using a laptop computer, calling for on-screen directions to Starbucks, and rehearsing your excuse that explains your tardiness to the boss.
Could we really ban Britney Spears CDs? I digress.
Before the law is done with revisions, no common person will be able to read and understand it, and mainly, drivers will just continue to take their chances.
This begs the significant philosophical question: Why bother?
Isn't it sufficient that citations can already be issued if the use of a cell phone is the cause of an accident? Why pile on? No harm, no foul: If the use of a cell phone isn't endangering anyone in the moment, why penalize for the harm that was not caused?
Ah, the law is to be a deterrent, to eliminate the possibility of harm. But won't it also become more than that? How much of a stretch is it to envision police pulling over drivers who endanger nobody on a deserted road at 11pm, but who are guilty of making a cell call, just so the officer can meet his monthly quota? Isn't that a harm all its own?
Say, if the police pull a driver over to the side of the road, isn't that the sort of distraction that could cause an accident? It should be banned!
Let's hope this Bill dies in committee. If it passes, Summers will run for re-election in 2006 on the basis of having produced this wonderful law? and of having been suitably busy.
Mike Kole is chair of the Libertarian Party of Hamilton County (Noblesville) and candidate for Secretary of State (2006).
Libertarian Writers' Bureau http://www.writersbureau.org
affordable house cleaning Park Ridge ..It appears we are getting a little bit of Sun... Read More
The RSS is getting feedback from its 140 pracharaks or... Read More
As you know Delta Airlines is close to bankruptcy. Their... Read More
The blogosphere has been jumping around the story like crazy... Read More
Many Americans feel betrayed by their government, our government. I... Read More
In the last Gulf War we saw thousands of enemy... Read More
When you see hooded Klansmen walking up Pennsylvania Avenue to... Read More
We can all see the issues involved in the cloning... Read More
Heaven, Hell, or some sort of Purgatory.I cannot seem to... Read More
When I was growing up, I actually considered a career... Read More
As of late steroid use in sports has been the... Read More
Possible UAV materials are infinite: Foam, Composite, Balsa Wood, Plastic,... Read More
In an effort to assist our political leadership it would... Read More
Let's put it all into perspective: the U.S. has an... Read More
The more I study the dynamics of WWII the more... Read More
The plight of whistleblowers ? those employees who sound the... Read More
I had the benefit of getting an interview with Mr.... Read More
Political strategists, branding gurus and image consultants could learn a... Read More
We need a government that can be as responsive to... Read More
If slavery has not worked well, then cloning if it... Read More
Bill Cosby got it wrong. His many speeches regarding the... Read More
There is nothing-absolutely nothing-insofar as political power when it is... Read More
I, too, am saddened by the disaster in New Orleans... Read More
What depth of blind insanity has inflicted itself upon Israel's... Read More
An irresponsible Chinese General made a very telling comment recently.... Read More
affordable house cleaning Mundelein ..Well many have complained that the FBI and CIA dropped... Read More
The number-one question people ask us is, "What possessed you... Read More
Sarbaines Oxley was probably the easiest way to destroy free... Read More
Few understand the Franchising Format and even fewer have correlated... Read More
Legislation is getting legs to further curtail your use of... Read More
When Boris Yeltsin spoke about an experiment that 'they' wrought... Read More
In order to win the presidency in America, candidates must... Read More
Fearful that terrorists will next target Australia, Prime Minister John... Read More
Our Hydro-electricity accounts for some 20% of our current needs.... Read More
The official working week is being reduced to 35 hours... Read More
We see today a fierce unspoken competition between trucks and... Read More
There's a new Michigan state register (at https://www.protectmichild.com/) in the... Read More
Water Conservation in larger cities is less of an issue... Read More
ADOLF HITLER:The common perception of Hitler being large and in... Read More
It is widely known in the Homosexual Male Populations that... Read More
There is a connection between economic growth and unemployment. There... Read More
Previously Senator Dick Armey and his staff in 2000 to... Read More
Many are condemning the latest GM Terminator seeds. Yet there... Read More
With the recent threats from Bin Laden and Al Queda... Read More
You have in front of you two buttons, one is... Read More
The prosecutors in the Martha Stewart Case used testimony from... Read More
All to often law makers and regulators create rules and... Read More
There are no stupid questions, only stupid people. Ask an... Read More
The paper industry in the US is hurting. Due to... Read More
You say, you want to help the Palestinians, but most... Read More
Political |