I always have to remember to take a deep breath when examining the laws being proposed by our grand Legislature. I detest most of the new legislation on the table, but have to forgive our representatives in the House and Senate for it. After all, writing laws is what a Legislature does, and if they don't write enough laws, it can begin to look like they've been loafing.
Call me strange, but I rather prefer a Legislature that goofs off and under produces new laws. I'm convinced we have enough of them already, and agree with Mark Twain, who famously said that no man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the Legislature is in session.
Mainly, that is because no lawmaker wants to look like a slacker, especially so soon after an election. It's bad form. As a result, we get some hideous proposals that I would chalk up as an effort to hide behind some broad good intention while looking meaningful, or at least busy.
House Bill 1508 is a textbook case as one such proposal.
Representative Vanessa Summers, an Indianapolis Democrat, has introduced legislation that would prohibit the use of cell phones, making exceptions for hands-free devices and for emergency use. The proposed fine for violations of the law would be up to $25.
The intent is to make our streets a little less hazardous. We have all groused at the idiot guilty of driving while in conversation that cut us off or made us miss a light, and we have cursed the driver and his cell phone. Summers' proposal takes its cue from similar laws passed in New York and the District of Columbia. As everyone knows, these cities now have the safest streets in the world.
This law is rife with problems, from practical application to the higher concerns of individual liberty.
I know four friends, right off the top of my head, who would gladly pay up to $25, as a cost of doing business. They think this highly of each and every one of their calls. $25 is no kind of deterrent for these people.
What is emergency use? I define emergency use of a cell phone as a frantic call to a friend because I suddenly had two tickets offered to me for a Colts' playoff game, and I have to accept within five minutes, or the tickets will be passed on to a co-worker. My wife defines it as having found a deal on furniture, and she's on her way home so I can look at fabric swatches. I'm betting that this is not what the Representative has in mind. Some revisions will be in order.
But why just cell phones? If the real intent of the law is to eliminate distractions from our roadways, why not ban them all? Summers could justifiably expand the proposal to include a ban on smoking in the car, adjusting the radio or inserting a Britney Spears CD, eating fast food, scolding the rug rats in the backseat, talking with your spouse, shaving or applying makeup, doing the crossword puzzle, using a laptop computer, calling for on-screen directions to Starbucks, and rehearsing your excuse that explains your tardiness to the boss.
Could we really ban Britney Spears CDs? I digress.
Before the law is done with revisions, no common person will be able to read and understand it, and mainly, drivers will just continue to take their chances.
This begs the significant philosophical question: Why bother?
Isn't it sufficient that citations can already be issued if the use of a cell phone is the cause of an accident? Why pile on? No harm, no foul: If the use of a cell phone isn't endangering anyone in the moment, why penalize for the harm that was not caused?
Ah, the law is to be a deterrent, to eliminate the possibility of harm. But won't it also become more than that? How much of a stretch is it to envision police pulling over drivers who endanger nobody on a deserted road at 11pm, but who are guilty of making a cell call, just so the officer can meet his monthly quota? Isn't that a harm all its own?
Say, if the police pull a driver over to the side of the road, isn't that the sort of distraction that could cause an accident? It should be banned!
Let's hope this Bill dies in committee. If it passes, Summers will run for re-election in 2006 on the basis of having produced this wonderful law? and of having been suitably busy.
Mike Kole is chair of the Libertarian Party of Hamilton County (Noblesville) and candidate for Secretary of State (2006).
Libertarian Writers' Bureau http://www.writersbureau.org
no-contract cleaning service Glenview ..In an age of terrorism, guerilla and total warfare the... Read More
We are having a problem in America with Public Notaries,... Read More
How do you feel about Terminator Seeds from Monsanto? I... Read More
The RSS is getting feedback from its 140 pracharaks or... Read More
We have seen an increase in Snowbirds from Northern States... Read More
1) IS HAVING A DEMOCRACY MORE EFFECTIVE IN ADDRESSING POLITICAL... Read More
Is the only way to fight Fundamentalist Extremists becoming one... Read More
Many people make a lot of money in war. In... Read More
In every national budget, there is a part called "Public... Read More
The CBR taxes the Pakistani source income of nonresident individuals... Read More
The recent Jakarta summit of Asia and Africa brought remembrance... Read More
In typical bureaucratese, the pensive EBRD analyst ventures with the... Read More
The UAV, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle is hear to stay and... Read More
Let's put the religious part of the debate for a... Read More
The problem of poverty in America comes as a surprise.... Read More
How many legs does a dog have if you call... Read More
This is the beginning of the end for the man... Read More
In Police Magazine I read a great article about transient... Read More
Submiting the Criminals to The ICC!Everybody concerns about justice in... Read More
With respect to the States' databases, you may not locate... Read More
Washington DC council member David Catania actually suggested that the... Read More
Reform Social Security has been talked of Capital Hill for... Read More
Recently the CIA staged a practice simulation of a cyber... Read More
We learned some lessons in these last few wars. For... Read More
Contrary to the Hobbesian prediction of anarchy (freedom) and brutish... Read More
house cleaning company Glencoe ..In the previous article, we described the various methods developed... Read More
The Federal Trade Commission has very important Anti-trust Laws. They... Read More
Introduction:Although politicians and so-called "Intelligence Experts" are the ones appearing... Read More
Osama bin Laden probably needs to get a pay raise,... Read More
I would like to discuss a few issues we have... Read More
The North American Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was implemented on January... Read More
Many people who are expert in the issue of the... Read More
Peace in the Middle East - whoa that is a... Read More
The predominant discussion in the Indianapolis media over the proposed... Read More
Every conflict has its economic moments and dimensions. The current... Read More
Japan lit its candles of pure, "noble sadness" on the... Read More
Mexican has tariffs on goods, which come into its country... Read More
Is Ohio Manufacturing Sector really unable to compete in the... Read More
The newest pebble reactors are easy to build and manage... Read More
The United States is losing its industrial capacity quite rapidly.... Read More
I'VE ALWAYS ARGUED THAT ECONOMIC ILLITERACY IS VERY COSTLY.This is... Read More
The Presidents Before Washington:From the moment that the first Declaration... Read More
Regarding the issues with the Space Shuttle and the in... Read More
An American soldier is taken behind enemy lines and brainwashed... Read More
Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Men desire power. Give power to... Read More
Many have lost faith in the government and are completely... Read More
Originally published in 1958, "The Ugly American" (Lederer & Burdick)... Read More
Our trade deficit is directly proportional to our attacks on... Read More
The current field of political sciences is dominated by a... Read More
Federal Trade Commission Owes Industry and Entrepreneurs an Apology. The... Read More
Political |