I always have to remember to take a deep breath when examining the laws being proposed by our grand Legislature. I detest most of the new legislation on the table, but have to forgive our representatives in the House and Senate for it. After all, writing laws is what a Legislature does, and if they don't write enough laws, it can begin to look like they've been loafing.
Call me strange, but I rather prefer a Legislature that goofs off and under produces new laws. I'm convinced we have enough of them already, and agree with Mark Twain, who famously said that no man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the Legislature is in session.
Mainly, that is because no lawmaker wants to look like a slacker, especially so soon after an election. It's bad form. As a result, we get some hideous proposals that I would chalk up as an effort to hide behind some broad good intention while looking meaningful, or at least busy.
House Bill 1508 is a textbook case as one such proposal.
Representative Vanessa Summers, an Indianapolis Democrat, has introduced legislation that would prohibit the use of cell phones, making exceptions for hands-free devices and for emergency use. The proposed fine for violations of the law would be up to $25.
The intent is to make our streets a little less hazardous. We have all groused at the idiot guilty of driving while in conversation that cut us off or made us miss a light, and we have cursed the driver and his cell phone. Summers' proposal takes its cue from similar laws passed in New York and the District of Columbia. As everyone knows, these cities now have the safest streets in the world.
This law is rife with problems, from practical application to the higher concerns of individual liberty.
I know four friends, right off the top of my head, who would gladly pay up to $25, as a cost of doing business. They think this highly of each and every one of their calls. $25 is no kind of deterrent for these people.
What is emergency use? I define emergency use of a cell phone as a frantic call to a friend because I suddenly had two tickets offered to me for a Colts' playoff game, and I have to accept within five minutes, or the tickets will be passed on to a co-worker. My wife defines it as having found a deal on furniture, and she's on her way home so I can look at fabric swatches. I'm betting that this is not what the Representative has in mind. Some revisions will be in order.
But why just cell phones? If the real intent of the law is to eliminate distractions from our roadways, why not ban them all? Summers could justifiably expand the proposal to include a ban on smoking in the car, adjusting the radio or inserting a Britney Spears CD, eating fast food, scolding the rug rats in the backseat, talking with your spouse, shaving or applying makeup, doing the crossword puzzle, using a laptop computer, calling for on-screen directions to Starbucks, and rehearsing your excuse that explains your tardiness to the boss.
Could we really ban Britney Spears CDs? I digress.
Before the law is done with revisions, no common person will be able to read and understand it, and mainly, drivers will just continue to take their chances.
This begs the significant philosophical question: Why bother?
Isn't it sufficient that citations can already be issued if the use of a cell phone is the cause of an accident? Why pile on? No harm, no foul: If the use of a cell phone isn't endangering anyone in the moment, why penalize for the harm that was not caused?
Ah, the law is to be a deterrent, to eliminate the possibility of harm. But won't it also become more than that? How much of a stretch is it to envision police pulling over drivers who endanger nobody on a deserted road at 11pm, but who are guilty of making a cell call, just so the officer can meet his monthly quota? Isn't that a harm all its own?
Say, if the police pull a driver over to the side of the road, isn't that the sort of distraction that could cause an accident? It should be banned!
Let's hope this Bill dies in committee. If it passes, Summers will run for re-election in 2006 on the basis of having produced this wonderful law? and of having been suitably busy.
Mike Kole is chair of the Libertarian Party of Hamilton County (Noblesville) and candidate for Secretary of State (2006).
Libertarian Writers' Bureau http://www.writersbureau.org
scheduled cleaning services Winnetka ..There is something egregiously wrong about a government that will... Read More
North Korea and diplomatic games; something has to give and... Read More
California Attorneys and politicians are to blame for the energy... Read More
In the most rewarding new industries, there is often a... Read More
As a result of the conflict analysis exercise and a... Read More
It is widely known in the Homosexual Male Populations that... Read More
With gasoline prices at the pump climbing strongly into the... Read More
The No Child Left Behind can work if the Federal... Read More
This is the beginning of the end for the man... Read More
Predicting the future is a tricky business. There have been... Read More
Businesses advertising alcohol either in TV or non-broadcast format need... Read More
The civil war in Iraq seems to be much more... Read More
Guides for RetailersThe regulations about marketing pearls are listed in... Read More
In his bid for the presidency, John Kerry pronounced a... Read More
"Like humans void of soul or mind, they jeered and... Read More
In the last Gulf War we saw thousands of enemy... Read More
Many people make a lot of money in war. In... Read More
A. THE PHILOSOPHY OF COMPETITIONThe aims of competition (anti-trust) laws... Read More
Aspartame activists are constantly being attacked because all data are... Read More
Is the Federal Trade Commission really stopping SPAM? Is the... Read More
Prosecutors with political ambitions are known to modify the truth... Read More
What ordinary people are saying about U.S. televangelist Pat Robertson... Read More
Last Summer the Federal Trade Commission came out with a... Read More
All to often law makers and regulators create rules and... Read More
Each day the present geo-political reality confirms what The Tribulation... Read More
reliable maid service Lincolnshire ..As baby boomers, we have been spoiled all of our... Read More
From the National Association of Realtors' Virtual Office Website policy,... Read More
All to often law makers and regulators create rules and... Read More
As you know Delta Airlines is close to bankruptcy. Their... Read More
This is the beginning of the end for the man... Read More
One third of all fertilized eggs spontaneously abort and are... Read More
There are so many problems with our perceived perfect checks... Read More
Federal Regulations on Business Destroy America, these regulations are a... Read More
J. Edgar Hoover and LBJ used to enjoy watching Hoover's... Read More
It appears we are getting a little bit of Sun... Read More
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Was created on July 30th 2002, by... Read More
I am not an African-American. Don't call me an African... Read More
The clause (c) of Electronic Crime Act 2004 has been... Read More
When this president's father was in the Oval Office, he... Read More
Possible UAV materials are infinite: Foam, Composite, Balsa Wood, Plastic,... Read More
Incompetence is all too obvious at the trade shows of... Read More
Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter to Lafayette in 1823 that... Read More
The evacuation of Gaza is now completed, and the world... Read More
Capitalism as the social structure was founded in order to... Read More
Tulipmania - this is the name coined for the first... Read More
Ohio's transportation sector seems to be strong, even with Ohio's... Read More
In a move that rocked the online world and left... Read More
ACCREDITATION: - Scholastic regimentation from the post WWII period has... Read More
Fearful that terrorists will next target Australia, Prime Minister John... Read More
De-classification of official documents have been a routine practice in... Read More
Political |