I always have to remember to take a deep breath when examining the laws being proposed by our grand Legislature. I detest most of the new legislation on the table, but have to forgive our representatives in the House and Senate for it. After all, writing laws is what a Legislature does, and if they don't write enough laws, it can begin to look like they've been loafing.
Call me strange, but I rather prefer a Legislature that goofs off and under produces new laws. I'm convinced we have enough of them already, and agree with Mark Twain, who famously said that no man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the Legislature is in session.
Mainly, that is because no lawmaker wants to look like a slacker, especially so soon after an election. It's bad form. As a result, we get some hideous proposals that I would chalk up as an effort to hide behind some broad good intention while looking meaningful, or at least busy.
House Bill 1508 is a textbook case as one such proposal.
Representative Vanessa Summers, an Indianapolis Democrat, has introduced legislation that would prohibit the use of cell phones, making exceptions for hands-free devices and for emergency use. The proposed fine for violations of the law would be up to $25.
The intent is to make our streets a little less hazardous. We have all groused at the idiot guilty of driving while in conversation that cut us off or made us miss a light, and we have cursed the driver and his cell phone. Summers' proposal takes its cue from similar laws passed in New York and the District of Columbia. As everyone knows, these cities now have the safest streets in the world.
This law is rife with problems, from practical application to the higher concerns of individual liberty.
I know four friends, right off the top of my head, who would gladly pay up to $25, as a cost of doing business. They think this highly of each and every one of their calls. $25 is no kind of deterrent for these people.
What is emergency use? I define emergency use of a cell phone as a frantic call to a friend because I suddenly had two tickets offered to me for a Colts' playoff game, and I have to accept within five minutes, or the tickets will be passed on to a co-worker. My wife defines it as having found a deal on furniture, and she's on her way home so I can look at fabric swatches. I'm betting that this is not what the Representative has in mind. Some revisions will be in order.
But why just cell phones? If the real intent of the law is to eliminate distractions from our roadways, why not ban them all? Summers could justifiably expand the proposal to include a ban on smoking in the car, adjusting the radio or inserting a Britney Spears CD, eating fast food, scolding the rug rats in the backseat, talking with your spouse, shaving or applying makeup, doing the crossword puzzle, using a laptop computer, calling for on-screen directions to Starbucks, and rehearsing your excuse that explains your tardiness to the boss.
Could we really ban Britney Spears CDs? I digress.
Before the law is done with revisions, no common person will be able to read and understand it, and mainly, drivers will just continue to take their chances.
This begs the significant philosophical question: Why bother?
Isn't it sufficient that citations can already be issued if the use of a cell phone is the cause of an accident? Why pile on? No harm, no foul: If the use of a cell phone isn't endangering anyone in the moment, why penalize for the harm that was not caused?
Ah, the law is to be a deterrent, to eliminate the possibility of harm. But won't it also become more than that? How much of a stretch is it to envision police pulling over drivers who endanger nobody on a deserted road at 11pm, but who are guilty of making a cell call, just so the officer can meet his monthly quota? Isn't that a harm all its own?
Say, if the police pull a driver over to the side of the road, isn't that the sort of distraction that could cause an accident? It should be banned!
Let's hope this Bill dies in committee. If it passes, Summers will run for re-election in 2006 on the basis of having produced this wonderful law? and of having been suitably busy.
Mike Kole is chair of the Libertarian Party of Hamilton County (Noblesville) and candidate for Secretary of State (2006).
Libertarian Writers' Bureau http://www.writersbureau.org
tidy up service Glenview ..The globalist's are the new breed, the new generation if... Read More
How much oil can travel through a pipeline? It depends... Read More
It is amazing how the Federal Trade Commission has destroyed... Read More
Many people who are expert in the issue of the... Read More
Roberto Calvo Macias, a young author and thinker from Spain,... Read More
Since the United States Government is promoting the whistle blower... Read More
For many years now, I have been the proud holder... Read More
Tax Evasion has been used to criminalize many, Nixon did... Read More
When were the forms of media created? When did advertising... Read More
The news media will regularly present views from Democratic (liberal),... Read More
President George W. Bush has unofficially won his re-election bid... Read More
The prosecutors in the Martha Stewart Case used testimony from... Read More
Amnesty International comments on the proposal that has been laid... Read More
"Rugged individualism" is actually a euphemism for Thomas Hobbes' baseless... Read More
The number-one question people ask us is, "What possessed you... Read More
I always have to remember to take a deep breath... Read More
Contrary to the Hobbesian prediction of anarchy (freedom) and brutish... Read More
Three years ago I published a book of short stories... Read More
We are slowing the transportation flows of our civilization by... Read More
As more and more cities and states set up websites... Read More
Telemarketing and DO NOT CALL lists sure made headlines, but... Read More
All countries have specific things that are abundant in the... Read More
With respect to the States' databases, you may not locate... Read More
You say, you want to help the Palestinians, but most... Read More
The trade deficit with Canada is now 50 Billion per... Read More
full-service cleaning Mundelein ..I heard on the news this week how America continues... Read More
Wealth Distribution is often discussed at length in periodicals such... Read More
Many very nice and loving homosexual male couples want to... Read More
Do you really want to get ahead in your life?... Read More
Perhaps a silent revolution is taking place, this time more... Read More
Recently a friend insisted that I read a book by... Read More
I would like to discuss a few issues we have... Read More
MUD ? Much Unnecessary DisclosureThe Federal Trade Commission recently asserted... Read More
The Randolphs:Peyton Randolph was the first President of the United... Read More
Federal Regulations on Business Destroy America, these regulations are a... Read More
We are destroying our freedoms and slowing innovation, due to... Read More
As we reel from the news of the recent bombings... Read More
There is debate about the methodology of forestry and also... Read More
Prosecutors with political ambitions are known to modify the truth... Read More
Most government agencies cannot pass an audit of their expenses.... Read More
In the previous article, we described the various methods developed... Read More
Americans pride themselves on being the best, that's a fact.... Read More
On June 16, 1972, a security guard at the Watergate... Read More
You have probably heard of the Sarbaines Oxley Law (SOX)... Read More
Incompetence is all too obvious at the trade shows of... Read More
Commission for Africa (CFA), one is made to understand is... Read More
The Second World War was the continuation of World War... Read More
Legislation is getting legs to further curtail your use of... Read More
From the National Association of Realtors' Virtual Office Website policy,... Read More
As you can see from some of our previous articles,... Read More
Political |