I always have to remember to take a deep breath when examining the laws being proposed by our grand Legislature. I detest most of the new legislation on the table, but have to forgive our representatives in the House and Senate for it. After all, writing laws is what a Legislature does, and if they don't write enough laws, it can begin to look like they've been loafing.
Call me strange, but I rather prefer a Legislature that goofs off and under produces new laws. I'm convinced we have enough of them already, and agree with Mark Twain, who famously said that no man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the Legislature is in session.
Mainly, that is because no lawmaker wants to look like a slacker, especially so soon after an election. It's bad form. As a result, we get some hideous proposals that I would chalk up as an effort to hide behind some broad good intention while looking meaningful, or at least busy.
House Bill 1508 is a textbook case as one such proposal.
Representative Vanessa Summers, an Indianapolis Democrat, has introduced legislation that would prohibit the use of cell phones, making exceptions for hands-free devices and for emergency use. The proposed fine for violations of the law would be up to $25.
The intent is to make our streets a little less hazardous. We have all groused at the idiot guilty of driving while in conversation that cut us off or made us miss a light, and we have cursed the driver and his cell phone. Summers' proposal takes its cue from similar laws passed in New York and the District of Columbia. As everyone knows, these cities now have the safest streets in the world.
This law is rife with problems, from practical application to the higher concerns of individual liberty.
I know four friends, right off the top of my head, who would gladly pay up to $25, as a cost of doing business. They think this highly of each and every one of their calls. $25 is no kind of deterrent for these people.
What is emergency use? I define emergency use of a cell phone as a frantic call to a friend because I suddenly had two tickets offered to me for a Colts' playoff game, and I have to accept within five minutes, or the tickets will be passed on to a co-worker. My wife defines it as having found a deal on furniture, and she's on her way home so I can look at fabric swatches. I'm betting that this is not what the Representative has in mind. Some revisions will be in order.
But why just cell phones? If the real intent of the law is to eliminate distractions from our roadways, why not ban them all? Summers could justifiably expand the proposal to include a ban on smoking in the car, adjusting the radio or inserting a Britney Spears CD, eating fast food, scolding the rug rats in the backseat, talking with your spouse, shaving or applying makeup, doing the crossword puzzle, using a laptop computer, calling for on-screen directions to Starbucks, and rehearsing your excuse that explains your tardiness to the boss.
Could we really ban Britney Spears CDs? I digress.
Before the law is done with revisions, no common person will be able to read and understand it, and mainly, drivers will just continue to take their chances.
This begs the significant philosophical question: Why bother?
Isn't it sufficient that citations can already be issued if the use of a cell phone is the cause of an accident? Why pile on? No harm, no foul: If the use of a cell phone isn't endangering anyone in the moment, why penalize for the harm that was not caused?
Ah, the law is to be a deterrent, to eliminate the possibility of harm. But won't it also become more than that? How much of a stretch is it to envision police pulling over drivers who endanger nobody on a deserted road at 11pm, but who are guilty of making a cell call, just so the officer can meet his monthly quota? Isn't that a harm all its own?
Say, if the police pull a driver over to the side of the road, isn't that the sort of distraction that could cause an accident? It should be banned!
Let's hope this Bill dies in committee. If it passes, Summers will run for re-election in 2006 on the basis of having produced this wonderful law? and of having been suitably busy.
Mike Kole is chair of the Libertarian Party of Hamilton County (Noblesville) and candidate for Secretary of State (2006).
Libertarian Writers' Bureau http://www.writersbureau.org
Brownsville wedding limousine .. Lockport Chicago limo O’HareYou say, you want to help the Palestinians, but most... Read More
As pictures and videos surface showing young American soldiers humiliating... Read More
In a recent report on the status of the Franchising... Read More
I read an interesting article in foreign Affairs magazine last... Read More
Former Senator, Daniel Moynihan, accurately summed up the situation when... Read More
Excess capacity occurs in many industries, such as power, electricity,... Read More
When you see hooded Klansmen walking up Pennsylvania Avenue to... Read More
America must implement a policy on Election Reform that is... Read More
Currently the United States has weapons, which can shoot around... Read More
Last Summer the Federal Trade Commission came out with a... Read More
Former Governor of Alaska, Jay Hammond, died at age 83,... Read More
The US-backed Road Map peace plan had no real chance... Read More
What depth of blind insanity has inflicted itself upon Israel's... Read More
UNAUTHORIZED HACKINGThe term "computer hacking" traditionally describes the penetration into... Read More
Many environmentalists are against roads through the forest because it... Read More
We have brain drain issues in Silicon Valley, we have... Read More
The 'Land of the Free' is teaming with individual rights... Read More
It is widely known in the Homosexual Male Populations that... Read More
You, the reader, should be aware of my affluence of... Read More
Hitler received a legacy from his Rothschild relations in Vienna... Read More
One of my favourite pieces of music is the Sex... Read More
Washington DC council member David Catania actually suggested that the... Read More
There are no stupid questions, only stupid people. Ask an... Read More
Sizing up North Korea is important for a war there.... Read More
OH MAN!Here we go again. I guess now the "proof... Read More
Culver prom limousines ..There is no doubt in hindsight that Sarbanes Oxley was... Read More
Often we see protests at the sites of global leader... Read More
I just got done reading a series of articles dating... Read More
As we watch fewer Americans voting it is no wonder... Read More
Farmers will eventually be facing federal regulations involving air emissions... Read More
Currently the United States has weapons, which can shoot around... Read More
Osama bin Laden probably needs to get a pay raise,... Read More
The use of religion is well-documented as a social engineering... Read More
Some people say that we cannot put a colony on... Read More
Public utilities and a problematic issue on the allowance of... Read More
Many MLM sales people mean well but they inadvertently commit... Read More
The devastating loss in case of Elliot Spitzer for NY... Read More
This is the third in a short series of four... Read More
Alexander Hamilton ? Policy Separated from Politics:I am related to... Read More
Recently the Los Angeles Transit workers are on Strike and... Read More
I always have to remember to take a deep breath... Read More
Conor MacDari was a Mason but his Masonry deplored the... Read More
-The Protocol plan 'will remain invisible until the moment when... Read More
News is spreading of the retirement of Supreme Court Justice... Read More
Legislation is getting legs to further curtail your use of... Read More
Rush is right! The government's stepped up bid to regulate... Read More
Recently a friend insisted that I read a book by... Read More
One way to increase evaporation in the ocean might be... Read More
Those of us hundreds of miles from ground zero sat... Read More
Currently the US Army is having trouble recruiting. These problems... Read More
Political |