I always have to remember to take a deep breath when examining the laws being proposed by our grand Legislature. I detest most of the new legislation on the table, but have to forgive our representatives in the House and Senate for it. After all, writing laws is what a Legislature does, and if they don't write enough laws, it can begin to look like they've been loafing.
Call me strange, but I rather prefer a Legislature that goofs off and under produces new laws. I'm convinced we have enough of them already, and agree with Mark Twain, who famously said that no man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the Legislature is in session.
Mainly, that is because no lawmaker wants to look like a slacker, especially so soon after an election. It's bad form. As a result, we get some hideous proposals that I would chalk up as an effort to hide behind some broad good intention while looking meaningful, or at least busy.
House Bill 1508 is a textbook case as one such proposal.
Representative Vanessa Summers, an Indianapolis Democrat, has introduced legislation that would prohibit the use of cell phones, making exceptions for hands-free devices and for emergency use. The proposed fine for violations of the law would be up to $25.
The intent is to make our streets a little less hazardous. We have all groused at the idiot guilty of driving while in conversation that cut us off or made us miss a light, and we have cursed the driver and his cell phone. Summers' proposal takes its cue from similar laws passed in New York and the District of Columbia. As everyone knows, these cities now have the safest streets in the world.
This law is rife with problems, from practical application to the higher concerns of individual liberty.
I know four friends, right off the top of my head, who would gladly pay up to $25, as a cost of doing business. They think this highly of each and every one of their calls. $25 is no kind of deterrent for these people.
What is emergency use? I define emergency use of a cell phone as a frantic call to a friend because I suddenly had two tickets offered to me for a Colts' playoff game, and I have to accept within five minutes, or the tickets will be passed on to a co-worker. My wife defines it as having found a deal on furniture, and she's on her way home so I can look at fabric swatches. I'm betting that this is not what the Representative has in mind. Some revisions will be in order.
But why just cell phones? If the real intent of the law is to eliminate distractions from our roadways, why not ban them all? Summers could justifiably expand the proposal to include a ban on smoking in the car, adjusting the radio or inserting a Britney Spears CD, eating fast food, scolding the rug rats in the backseat, talking with your spouse, shaving or applying makeup, doing the crossword puzzle, using a laptop computer, calling for on-screen directions to Starbucks, and rehearsing your excuse that explains your tardiness to the boss.
Could we really ban Britney Spears CDs? I digress.
Before the law is done with revisions, no common person will be able to read and understand it, and mainly, drivers will just continue to take their chances.
This begs the significant philosophical question: Why bother?
Isn't it sufficient that citations can already be issued if the use of a cell phone is the cause of an accident? Why pile on? No harm, no foul: If the use of a cell phone isn't endangering anyone in the moment, why penalize for the harm that was not caused?
Ah, the law is to be a deterrent, to eliminate the possibility of harm. But won't it also become more than that? How much of a stretch is it to envision police pulling over drivers who endanger nobody on a deserted road at 11pm, but who are guilty of making a cell call, just so the officer can meet his monthly quota? Isn't that a harm all its own?
Say, if the police pull a driver over to the side of the road, isn't that the sort of distraction that could cause an accident? It should be banned!
Let's hope this Bill dies in committee. If it passes, Summers will run for re-election in 2006 on the basis of having produced this wonderful law? and of having been suitably busy.
Mike Kole is chair of the Libertarian Party of Hamilton County (Noblesville) and candidate for Secretary of State (2006).
Libertarian Writers' Bureau http://www.writersbureau.org
insured cleaning company Deerfield ..As global warming continues to escalate the concerns of today's... Read More
Mexican has tariffs on goods, which come into its country... Read More
Originally published in 1958, "The Ugly American" (Lederer & Burdick)... Read More
The No Child Left Behind can work if the Federal... Read More
The Right's defense of John Thune in the Dan Nelson/MetaBank... Read More
"Like humans void of soul or mind, they jeered and... Read More
Any chances for a country to be ruled by alternative... Read More
Well, another election has come and gone in the US... Read More
The expertise and advancement of the evolution of man and... Read More
Britain has a proud tradition of valiant armed forces and... Read More
Land Mines have been one of the most evil left... Read More
The plight of whistleblowers ? those employees who sound the... Read More
City Governments is their quest for; "quality of life" often... Read More
The Second World War was the continuation of World War... Read More
I'm starting to feel squeezed by all the political correctness... Read More
Why did FDR say Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and Count... Read More
Many parents might think it a bit farfetched to compare... Read More
There is debate about the methodology of forestry and also... Read More
Elliot Spitzer, recently said he wanted to drive a stake... Read More
Last week, the media coverage called the airplane crash in... Read More
The most damaging factor to our economy today is the... Read More
Many people do not understand politics very well. They often... Read More
We are slowing the transportation flows of our civilization by... Read More
The newest pebble reactors are easy to build and manage... Read More
The Carl Rove issue is definitely interesting and distracting. The... Read More
top rated cleaning service Bannockburn ..The Randolphs:Peyton Randolph was the first President of the United... Read More
On June 16, 1972, a security guard at the Watergate... Read More
I like Bill O'Reilly. I do. I have read two... Read More
UNAUTHORIZED HACKINGThe term "computer hacking" traditionally describes the penetration into... Read More
Recently in Professional Builder a cover article discussed how the... Read More
The North American Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was implemented on January... Read More
One of my favourite pieces of music is the Sex... Read More
We recently saw another ferry accident, this one in NY... Read More
It is amazing we have so many men, who belong... Read More
If someone wanted to farm future clones they would need... Read More
You know we have sent many, many army tanks with... Read More
The recent Jakarta summit of Asia and Africa brought remembrance... Read More
In the event of that a threatening nation to the... Read More
I am not an African-American. Don't call me an African... Read More
ADOLF HITLER:The common perception of Hitler being large and in... Read More
President Bush's selection of the Hon. John Roberts is an... Read More
In the fields of juvenile justice policy and programming, there... Read More
Why President Bush should have his second term? The arguments... Read More
Blessed with Chinese GDP growth rates (7-8% annually in each... Read More
At the start of the US involvement in WWII Joseph... Read More
From the National Association of Realtors' Virtual Office Website policy,... Read More
Our Airports have excess capacity, which is not being used... Read More
In a move that rocked the online world and left... Read More
As more and more cities and states set up websites... Read More
A few hours ago, Colonel Ely Ould Mohamed Vall, the... Read More
Political |