I always have to remember to take a deep breath when examining the laws being proposed by our grand Legislature. I detest most of the new legislation on the table, but have to forgive our representatives in the House and Senate for it. After all, writing laws is what a Legislature does, and if they don't write enough laws, it can begin to look like they've been loafing.
Call me strange, but I rather prefer a Legislature that goofs off and under produces new laws. I'm convinced we have enough of them already, and agree with Mark Twain, who famously said that no man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the Legislature is in session.
Mainly, that is because no lawmaker wants to look like a slacker, especially so soon after an election. It's bad form. As a result, we get some hideous proposals that I would chalk up as an effort to hide behind some broad good intention while looking meaningful, or at least busy.
House Bill 1508 is a textbook case as one such proposal.
Representative Vanessa Summers, an Indianapolis Democrat, has introduced legislation that would prohibit the use of cell phones, making exceptions for hands-free devices and for emergency use. The proposed fine for violations of the law would be up to $25.
The intent is to make our streets a little less hazardous. We have all groused at the idiot guilty of driving while in conversation that cut us off or made us miss a light, and we have cursed the driver and his cell phone. Summers' proposal takes its cue from similar laws passed in New York and the District of Columbia. As everyone knows, these cities now have the safest streets in the world.
This law is rife with problems, from practical application to the higher concerns of individual liberty.
I know four friends, right off the top of my head, who would gladly pay up to $25, as a cost of doing business. They think this highly of each and every one of their calls. $25 is no kind of deterrent for these people.
What is emergency use? I define emergency use of a cell phone as a frantic call to a friend because I suddenly had two tickets offered to me for a Colts' playoff game, and I have to accept within five minutes, or the tickets will be passed on to a co-worker. My wife defines it as having found a deal on furniture, and she's on her way home so I can look at fabric swatches. I'm betting that this is not what the Representative has in mind. Some revisions will be in order.
But why just cell phones? If the real intent of the law is to eliminate distractions from our roadways, why not ban them all? Summers could justifiably expand the proposal to include a ban on smoking in the car, adjusting the radio or inserting a Britney Spears CD, eating fast food, scolding the rug rats in the backseat, talking with your spouse, shaving or applying makeup, doing the crossword puzzle, using a laptop computer, calling for on-screen directions to Starbucks, and rehearsing your excuse that explains your tardiness to the boss.
Could we really ban Britney Spears CDs? I digress.
Before the law is done with revisions, no common person will be able to read and understand it, and mainly, drivers will just continue to take their chances.
This begs the significant philosophical question: Why bother?
Isn't it sufficient that citations can already be issued if the use of a cell phone is the cause of an accident? Why pile on? No harm, no foul: If the use of a cell phone isn't endangering anyone in the moment, why penalize for the harm that was not caused?
Ah, the law is to be a deterrent, to eliminate the possibility of harm. But won't it also become more than that? How much of a stretch is it to envision police pulling over drivers who endanger nobody on a deserted road at 11pm, but who are guilty of making a cell call, just so the officer can meet his monthly quota? Isn't that a harm all its own?
Say, if the police pull a driver over to the side of the road, isn't that the sort of distraction that could cause an accident? It should be banned!
Let's hope this Bill dies in committee. If it passes, Summers will run for re-election in 2006 on the basis of having produced this wonderful law? and of having been suitably busy.
Mike Kole is chair of the Libertarian Party of Hamilton County (Noblesville) and candidate for Secretary of State (2006).
Libertarian Writers' Bureau http://www.writersbureau.org
cleaning service near Bannockburn ..As global warming continues to escalate the concerns of today's... Read More
For years we've suffered under recession, prompting us to ask,... Read More
ACCREDITATION: - Scholastic regimentation from the post WWII period has... Read More
It is amazing how the Federal Trade Commission has destroyed... Read More
Handing over power to Vladimir Putin in 1999, Boris Yeltsin... Read More
Three years ago I published a book of short stories... Read More
I. WARS ARE BASIC CONFLICTS OVER LAND. II. BOUNDARIES. THE... Read More
I am an incurably ill American male forced to leave... Read More
J. Edgar Hoover and LBJ used to enjoy watching Hoover's... Read More
Indian and Pakistan and nuclear war. What does the world... Read More
We have brain drain issues in Silicon Valley, we have... Read More
The Flow of Trade is a major consideration of civilizations... Read More
The Right's defense of John Thune in the Dan Nelson/MetaBank... Read More
In the future when we decide to help nations vote... Read More
Non-lethal Goo Concepts have been tossed around by many war... Read More
It is a law that we register deadly weapons with... Read More
Contrary to the Hobbesian prediction of anarchy (freedom) and brutish... Read More
An idea to defend oil infrastructure in the Middle East... Read More
As the death toll in the avalanche-hit Jammu and Kashmir... Read More
A. THE PHILOSOPHY OF COMPETITIONThe aims of competition (anti-trust) laws... Read More
With pain rocking through my whole body today, I cast... Read More
Federal Regulations on Business Destroy America, these regulations are a... Read More
Is the only way to fight Fundamentalist Extremists becoming one... Read More
Possible UAV materials are infinite: Foam, Composite, Balsa Wood, Plastic,... Read More
The US-backed Road Map peace plan had no real chance... Read More
pet-friendly home cleaners Mundelein ..One question not addressed in GM Crops and Monsanto Terminator... Read More
We have heard a lot about the coming bird flu... Read More
I'VE ALWAYS ARGUED THAT ECONOMIC ILLITERACY IS VERY COSTLY.This is... Read More
It is amazing how the Federal Trade Commission has destroyed... Read More
As the Baby Boomer Generation continue to get older, one... Read More
Dust from Deserts and Particulate ControlThe greatest contributor to particulate... Read More
As concerns grow over the threat of bioterrorism and weapons... Read More
Often we see protests at the sites of global leader... Read More
If slavery has not worked well, then cloning if it... Read More
Recently I met a man in a coffee shop, a... Read More
(1) Each person is to have an equal right to... Read More
Perhaps we should have printers with ink which has metallic... Read More
In Belarus parliament is going to struggle with degeneration of... Read More
I am an incurably ill American male forced to leave... Read More
For more than a decade, you the American taxpayer have... Read More
Revitalization Downtown projects are all the rage in fact the... Read More
The European Court of Justice ("ECJ") ruled in Praktiker Bau-... Read More
Many believe Al-Qaida already has nukes in the United States... Read More
The furore in the BJP camp in India, triggered by... Read More
Expected new applications for Mexican trucks to enter the US... Read More
These leaders like the Rothschilds who backed Crowley's Hermetic Order... Read More
IN A DAY AND AGE where one voice screaming among... Read More
Many times our government regulatory over embellish problems in the... Read More
This is the fourth and final article in a series... Read More
With pain rocking through my whole body today, I cast... Read More
Political |