I always have to remember to take a deep breath when examining the laws being proposed by our grand Legislature. I detest most of the new legislation on the table, but have to forgive our representatives in the House and Senate for it. After all, writing laws is what a Legislature does, and if they don't write enough laws, it can begin to look like they've been loafing.
Call me strange, but I rather prefer a Legislature that goofs off and under produces new laws. I'm convinced we have enough of them already, and agree with Mark Twain, who famously said that no man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the Legislature is in session.
Mainly, that is because no lawmaker wants to look like a slacker, especially so soon after an election. It's bad form. As a result, we get some hideous proposals that I would chalk up as an effort to hide behind some broad good intention while looking meaningful, or at least busy.
House Bill 1508 is a textbook case as one such proposal.
Representative Vanessa Summers, an Indianapolis Democrat, has introduced legislation that would prohibit the use of cell phones, making exceptions for hands-free devices and for emergency use. The proposed fine for violations of the law would be up to $25.
The intent is to make our streets a little less hazardous. We have all groused at the idiot guilty of driving while in conversation that cut us off or made us miss a light, and we have cursed the driver and his cell phone. Summers' proposal takes its cue from similar laws passed in New York and the District of Columbia. As everyone knows, these cities now have the safest streets in the world.
This law is rife with problems, from practical application to the higher concerns of individual liberty.
I know four friends, right off the top of my head, who would gladly pay up to $25, as a cost of doing business. They think this highly of each and every one of their calls. $25 is no kind of deterrent for these people.
What is emergency use? I define emergency use of a cell phone as a frantic call to a friend because I suddenly had two tickets offered to me for a Colts' playoff game, and I have to accept within five minutes, or the tickets will be passed on to a co-worker. My wife defines it as having found a deal on furniture, and she's on her way home so I can look at fabric swatches. I'm betting that this is not what the Representative has in mind. Some revisions will be in order.
But why just cell phones? If the real intent of the law is to eliminate distractions from our roadways, why not ban them all? Summers could justifiably expand the proposal to include a ban on smoking in the car, adjusting the radio or inserting a Britney Spears CD, eating fast food, scolding the rug rats in the backseat, talking with your spouse, shaving or applying makeup, doing the crossword puzzle, using a laptop computer, calling for on-screen directions to Starbucks, and rehearsing your excuse that explains your tardiness to the boss.
Could we really ban Britney Spears CDs? I digress.
Before the law is done with revisions, no common person will be able to read and understand it, and mainly, drivers will just continue to take their chances.
This begs the significant philosophical question: Why bother?
Isn't it sufficient that citations can already be issued if the use of a cell phone is the cause of an accident? Why pile on? No harm, no foul: If the use of a cell phone isn't endangering anyone in the moment, why penalize for the harm that was not caused?
Ah, the law is to be a deterrent, to eliminate the possibility of harm. But won't it also become more than that? How much of a stretch is it to envision police pulling over drivers who endanger nobody on a deserted road at 11pm, but who are guilty of making a cell call, just so the officer can meet his monthly quota? Isn't that a harm all its own?
Say, if the police pull a driver over to the side of the road, isn't that the sort of distraction that could cause an accident? It should be banned!
Let's hope this Bill dies in committee. If it passes, Summers will run for re-election in 2006 on the basis of having produced this wonderful law? and of having been suitably busy.
Mike Kole is chair of the Libertarian Party of Hamilton County (Noblesville) and candidate for Secretary of State (2006).
Libertarian Writers' Bureau http://www.writersbureau.org
weekly home cleaning Highland Park ..Currently the United States has weapons, which can shoot around... Read More
We need a government that can be as responsive to... Read More
"Rugged individualism" is actually a euphemism for Thomas Hobbes' baseless... Read More
Large parts of the world today suffer from a severe... Read More
Mexico the country of Salsa, Tortillas and Corruption; I first... Read More
..."history may judge us to be the real bully if,... Read More
The globalist's are the new breed, the new generation if... Read More
Mexican has tariffs on goods, which come into its country... Read More
If someone wanted to farm future clones they would need... Read More
Rufus King: (Said to be the fifth most important person... Read More
Former Senator, Daniel Moynihan, accurately summed up the situation when... Read More
A Governmental commission, headed personally by the Prime Minister has... Read More
The current field of political sciences is dominated by a... Read More
The great leader and Senator from New York and wife... Read More
I hope to provide a starting point for the serious... Read More
Long Term Environmental Effect of Plastics, Composites and Other Materials... Read More
Recently the FTC, Federal Trade Commission put forth a report... Read More
UNAUTHORIZED HACKINGThe term "computer hacking" traditionally describes the penetration into... Read More
Societies have always had a problem of what to do... Read More
There's a new Michigan state register (at https://www.protectmichild.com/) in the... Read More
Bosnia-Herzegovina (heretofore "Bosnia") is an artificial polity with four, tangentially... Read More
America must implement a policy on Election Reform that is... Read More
Regarding the issues with the Space Shuttle and the in... Read More
Fifteen hours is a tremendous barrier. It is the obstacle... Read More
The evacuation of Gaza is now completed, and the world... Read More
whole house cleaning Park Ridge ..A quick look back at NAFTA; how did we do?Stabilizing... Read More
It is amazing we have so many men, who belong... Read More
The partisan feuding in the U.S. Senate over federal judicial... Read More
Perhaps a silent revolution is taking place, this time more... Read More
It appears we are having a terrible situation with the... Read More
In the event of that a threatening nation to the... Read More
We are slowing the transportation flows of our civilization by... Read More
It appears the Feds are suing Elliot Spitzer over his... Read More
The No Child Left Behind can work if the Federal... Read More
For more than a decade, you the American taxpayer have... Read More
The recent scathing remarks by High Court Judge Richard Mawrey... Read More
The expertise and advancement of the evolution of man and... Read More
Lecture given at the Netherlands Economic Institute (NEI) on 18/4/2001Human... Read More
Many people make a lot of money in war. In... Read More
Most government agencies cannot pass an audit of their expenses.... Read More
"Had there not been outsourcing and utilization of cheaper resources... Read More
Most modern day media stories containing fear, controversy and chaos... Read More
De-classification of official documents have been a routine practice in... Read More
As the populations expand in Colorado outside of Denver, Las... Read More
Are the junior attorneys in the Attorney General's office leaving... Read More
Heaven, Hell, or some sort of Purgatory.I cannot seem to... Read More
Clint Eastwood recently plunged into the murky political pond with... Read More
Alexander Hamilton ? Policy Separated from Politics:I am related to... Read More
Please read through this quick thought and discussion as if... Read More
Heavens, what are we up against? It seems these days... Read More
Political |