I always have to remember to take a deep breath when examining the laws being proposed by our grand Legislature. I detest most of the new legislation on the table, but have to forgive our representatives in the House and Senate for it. After all, writing laws is what a Legislature does, and if they don't write enough laws, it can begin to look like they've been loafing.
Call me strange, but I rather prefer a Legislature that goofs off and under produces new laws. I'm convinced we have enough of them already, and agree with Mark Twain, who famously said that no man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the Legislature is in session.
Mainly, that is because no lawmaker wants to look like a slacker, especially so soon after an election. It's bad form. As a result, we get some hideous proposals that I would chalk up as an effort to hide behind some broad good intention while looking meaningful, or at least busy.
House Bill 1508 is a textbook case as one such proposal.
Representative Vanessa Summers, an Indianapolis Democrat, has introduced legislation that would prohibit the use of cell phones, making exceptions for hands-free devices and for emergency use. The proposed fine for violations of the law would be up to $25.
The intent is to make our streets a little less hazardous. We have all groused at the idiot guilty of driving while in conversation that cut us off or made us miss a light, and we have cursed the driver and his cell phone. Summers' proposal takes its cue from similar laws passed in New York and the District of Columbia. As everyone knows, these cities now have the safest streets in the world.
This law is rife with problems, from practical application to the higher concerns of individual liberty.
I know four friends, right off the top of my head, who would gladly pay up to $25, as a cost of doing business. They think this highly of each and every one of their calls. $25 is no kind of deterrent for these people.
What is emergency use? I define emergency use of a cell phone as a frantic call to a friend because I suddenly had two tickets offered to me for a Colts' playoff game, and I have to accept within five minutes, or the tickets will be passed on to a co-worker. My wife defines it as having found a deal on furniture, and she's on her way home so I can look at fabric swatches. I'm betting that this is not what the Representative has in mind. Some revisions will be in order.
But why just cell phones? If the real intent of the law is to eliminate distractions from our roadways, why not ban them all? Summers could justifiably expand the proposal to include a ban on smoking in the car, adjusting the radio or inserting a Britney Spears CD, eating fast food, scolding the rug rats in the backseat, talking with your spouse, shaving or applying makeup, doing the crossword puzzle, using a laptop computer, calling for on-screen directions to Starbucks, and rehearsing your excuse that explains your tardiness to the boss.
Could we really ban Britney Spears CDs? I digress.
Before the law is done with revisions, no common person will be able to read and understand it, and mainly, drivers will just continue to take their chances.
This begs the significant philosophical question: Why bother?
Isn't it sufficient that citations can already be issued if the use of a cell phone is the cause of an accident? Why pile on? No harm, no foul: If the use of a cell phone isn't endangering anyone in the moment, why penalize for the harm that was not caused?
Ah, the law is to be a deterrent, to eliminate the possibility of harm. But won't it also become more than that? How much of a stretch is it to envision police pulling over drivers who endanger nobody on a deserted road at 11pm, but who are guilty of making a cell call, just so the officer can meet his monthly quota? Isn't that a harm all its own?
Say, if the police pull a driver over to the side of the road, isn't that the sort of distraction that could cause an accident? It should be banned!
Let's hope this Bill dies in committee. If it passes, Summers will run for re-election in 2006 on the basis of having produced this wonderful law? and of having been suitably busy.
Mike Kole is chair of the Libertarian Party of Hamilton County (Noblesville) and candidate for Secretary of State (2006).
Libertarian Writers' Bureau http://www.writersbureau.org
personalized cleaning services Des Plaines ..INTRODUCTIONPERHAPS the sentiments contained in the following pages, are not... Read More
Guides for RetailersThe regulations about marketing pearls are listed in... Read More
The end of another election once again brings into focus... Read More
The Federal trade Commission has a rule, which says that... Read More
Water Conservation in larger cities is less of an issue... Read More
Are you happy with all this so-called security after 9-11?... Read More
California Attorneys and politicians are to blame for the energy... Read More
Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter to Lafayette in 1823 that... Read More
Presently Universities and Private Enterprise are working to build more... Read More
In a recent report on the status of the Franchising... Read More
Veterans Affairs Employees using government credit cards on personal items?... Read More
As pictures and videos surface showing young American soldiers humiliating... Read More
To be justified, taxes should satisfy a few conditions:Above all,... Read More
The use of homosexual men in the area of espionage... Read More
(Note: This article was written slightly before the 2004 election;... Read More
Well having studying the need for decreasing America's dependence on... Read More
Recently a friend insisted that I read a book by... Read More
The price at the gas pump is certainly on everyone's... Read More
Currently the US Army is having trouble recruiting. These problems... Read More
North Korea and diplomatic games; something has to give and... Read More
I've been thinking again. I know some of my readers... Read More
Streamlining Homeland Security with a Free market flair? An idea... Read More
There's a new Michigan state register (at https://www.protectmichild.com/) in the... Read More
While many Pennsylvanians are struggling to figure out how they... Read More
I would like to discuss the blocked persons list of... Read More
family-safe home cleaners Arlington Heights ..(1) Each person is to have an equal right to... Read More
Year Item Price Rate of Inflation 03/80 Gasoline (per gallon)... Read More
Many folks who are pro-NASA and Pro-Space Colonies say that... Read More
The partisan feuding in the U.S. Senate over federal judicial... Read More
The CBR taxes the Pakistani source income of nonresident individuals... Read More
Without the flow of fuel our very mobile society comes... Read More
We see today a fierce unspoken competition between trucks and... Read More
Legislation was introduced into Congress this week that would establish... Read More
In response to Douglas Bower's article; Logic Class 101 Applied... Read More
The head of the Club of Rome has said that... Read More
The debate to raise minimum wage in California is totally... Read More
This is the first of a series of four articles... Read More
North Korea and diplomatic games; something has to give and... Read More
As the populations expand in Colorado outside of Denver, Las... Read More
It never fails to amaze me. HM Customs and Excise... Read More
Britain has a proud tradition of valiant armed forces and... Read More
INTRODUCTIONThe aim of writing this article is to encourage the... Read More
There are many types of fuels besides that gasoline we... Read More
One third of all fertilized eggs spontaneously abort and are... Read More
I've been thinking again. I know some of my readers... Read More
Clint Eastwood recently plunged into the murky political pond with... Read More
I, too, am saddened by the disaster in New Orleans... Read More
I would like to discuss the blocked persons list of... Read More
Ohio's transportation sector seems to be strong, even with Ohio's... Read More
"Those who sacrifice essential liberty for temporary safety are not... Read More
Political |