I always have to remember to take a deep breath when examining the laws being proposed by our grand Legislature. I detest most of the new legislation on the table, but have to forgive our representatives in the House and Senate for it. After all, writing laws is what a Legislature does, and if they don't write enough laws, it can begin to look like they've been loafing.
Call me strange, but I rather prefer a Legislature that goofs off and under produces new laws. I'm convinced we have enough of them already, and agree with Mark Twain, who famously said that no man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the Legislature is in session.
Mainly, that is because no lawmaker wants to look like a slacker, especially so soon after an election. It's bad form. As a result, we get some hideous proposals that I would chalk up as an effort to hide behind some broad good intention while looking meaningful, or at least busy.
House Bill 1508 is a textbook case as one such proposal.
Representative Vanessa Summers, an Indianapolis Democrat, has introduced legislation that would prohibit the use of cell phones, making exceptions for hands-free devices and for emergency use. The proposed fine for violations of the law would be up to $25.
The intent is to make our streets a little less hazardous. We have all groused at the idiot guilty of driving while in conversation that cut us off or made us miss a light, and we have cursed the driver and his cell phone. Summers' proposal takes its cue from similar laws passed in New York and the District of Columbia. As everyone knows, these cities now have the safest streets in the world.
This law is rife with problems, from practical application to the higher concerns of individual liberty.
I know four friends, right off the top of my head, who would gladly pay up to $25, as a cost of doing business. They think this highly of each and every one of their calls. $25 is no kind of deterrent for these people.
What is emergency use? I define emergency use of a cell phone as a frantic call to a friend because I suddenly had two tickets offered to me for a Colts' playoff game, and I have to accept within five minutes, or the tickets will be passed on to a co-worker. My wife defines it as having found a deal on furniture, and she's on her way home so I can look at fabric swatches. I'm betting that this is not what the Representative has in mind. Some revisions will be in order.
But why just cell phones? If the real intent of the law is to eliminate distractions from our roadways, why not ban them all? Summers could justifiably expand the proposal to include a ban on smoking in the car, adjusting the radio or inserting a Britney Spears CD, eating fast food, scolding the rug rats in the backseat, talking with your spouse, shaving or applying makeup, doing the crossword puzzle, using a laptop computer, calling for on-screen directions to Starbucks, and rehearsing your excuse that explains your tardiness to the boss.
Could we really ban Britney Spears CDs? I digress.
Before the law is done with revisions, no common person will be able to read and understand it, and mainly, drivers will just continue to take their chances.
This begs the significant philosophical question: Why bother?
Isn't it sufficient that citations can already be issued if the use of a cell phone is the cause of an accident? Why pile on? No harm, no foul: If the use of a cell phone isn't endangering anyone in the moment, why penalize for the harm that was not caused?
Ah, the law is to be a deterrent, to eliminate the possibility of harm. But won't it also become more than that? How much of a stretch is it to envision police pulling over drivers who endanger nobody on a deserted road at 11pm, but who are guilty of making a cell call, just so the officer can meet his monthly quota? Isn't that a harm all its own?
Say, if the police pull a driver over to the side of the road, isn't that the sort of distraction that could cause an accident? It should be banned!
Let's hope this Bill dies in committee. If it passes, Summers will run for re-election in 2006 on the basis of having produced this wonderful law? and of having been suitably busy.
Mike Kole is chair of the Libertarian Party of Hamilton County (Noblesville) and candidate for Secretary of State (2006).
Libertarian Writers' Bureau http://www.writersbureau.org
kitchen deep cleaning Deerfield ..The furore in the BJP camp in India, triggered by... Read More
We all know Elliot Spitzer is going to run for... Read More
I have to be honest. It is time to come... Read More
Pierre Dupont de Nemours:After arranging the Armistice that ended or... Read More
Previously Senator Dick Armey and his staff in 2000 to... Read More
The Jihad against the Western World will continue. It will... Read More
With pain rocking through my whole body today, I cast... Read More
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development issued a report... Read More
The Randolphs:Peyton Randolph was the first President of the United... Read More
Do you find it interesting that people complain about the... Read More
User BaseThe non-US and non-English Web segments have been boosted... Read More
J. Edgar Hoover and LBJ used to enjoy watching Hoover's... Read More
An American soldier is taken behind enemy lines and brainwashed... Read More
This, of course, is a political decision. There is no... Read More
In Police Magazine I read a great article about transient... Read More
Today we have a new franchise report from the Federal... Read More
A few hours ago, Colonel Ely Ould Mohamed Vall, the... Read More
The civil war in Iraq seems to be much more... Read More
The Connecticut Conference of Municipalities (CCM) is interested in the... Read More
Many of the problems that the members of the European... Read More
One of my favourite pieces of music is the Sex... Read More
Most citizens agree that we need the Federal Trade Commission... Read More
Most politicians are completely out to lunch and totally Machiavellian... Read More
To be justified, taxes should satisfy a few conditions:Above all,... Read More
The plight of whistleblowers ? those employees who sound the... Read More
interior house cleaning Highland Park ..Many times our government regulatory over embellish problems in the... Read More
We should all give much kudos to the Federal Trade... Read More
China is serious about breaking into the bio-tech field and... Read More
There is a lot of debate about who made the... Read More
I just got done reading a series of articles dating... Read More
Recently I got to talking with a gentleman at a... Read More
Many in the World Media are quick to judge the... Read More
Last week, the media coverage called the airplane crash in... Read More
Last Summer the Federal Trade Commission came out with a... Read More
Japan lit its candles of pure, "noble sadness" on the... Read More
"When you are right you cannot be too radical; when... Read More
A coffee shop conversation about a Great Country in Historic... Read More
Submiting the Criminals to The ICC!Everybody concerns about justice in... Read More
Let the reader be reminded, that this document we are... Read More
Many parents might think it a bit farfetched to compare... Read More
Airlines do not allow cell phones on board, but they... Read More
IN A DAY AND AGE where one voice screaming among... Read More
America has some monetary issues, which need to be addressed.... Read More
Many are quick to point out the benefits of religion... Read More
Visible remnants of the world's eldest democracy can be seen... Read More
A SOLUTION FOR EMPLOYMENT PROBLEMS TO AID IN THE FIGHT... Read More
Reform Social Security has been talked of Capital Hill for... Read More
We have brain drain issues in Silicon Valley, we have... Read More
We have all heard of the huge debates surrounding genetically... Read More
The shouting is over and directions for the next four... Read More
Political |