I always have to remember to take a deep breath when examining the laws being proposed by our grand Legislature. I detest most of the new legislation on the table, but have to forgive our representatives in the House and Senate for it. After all, writing laws is what a Legislature does, and if they don't write enough laws, it can begin to look like they've been loafing.
Call me strange, but I rather prefer a Legislature that goofs off and under produces new laws. I'm convinced we have enough of them already, and agree with Mark Twain, who famously said that no man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the Legislature is in session.
Mainly, that is because no lawmaker wants to look like a slacker, especially so soon after an election. It's bad form. As a result, we get some hideous proposals that I would chalk up as an effort to hide behind some broad good intention while looking meaningful, or at least busy.
House Bill 1508 is a textbook case as one such proposal.
Representative Vanessa Summers, an Indianapolis Democrat, has introduced legislation that would prohibit the use of cell phones, making exceptions for hands-free devices and for emergency use. The proposed fine for violations of the law would be up to $25.
The intent is to make our streets a little less hazardous. We have all groused at the idiot guilty of driving while in conversation that cut us off or made us miss a light, and we have cursed the driver and his cell phone. Summers' proposal takes its cue from similar laws passed in New York and the District of Columbia. As everyone knows, these cities now have the safest streets in the world.
This law is rife with problems, from practical application to the higher concerns of individual liberty.
I know four friends, right off the top of my head, who would gladly pay up to $25, as a cost of doing business. They think this highly of each and every one of their calls. $25 is no kind of deterrent for these people.
What is emergency use? I define emergency use of a cell phone as a frantic call to a friend because I suddenly had two tickets offered to me for a Colts' playoff game, and I have to accept within five minutes, or the tickets will be passed on to a co-worker. My wife defines it as having found a deal on furniture, and she's on her way home so I can look at fabric swatches. I'm betting that this is not what the Representative has in mind. Some revisions will be in order.
But why just cell phones? If the real intent of the law is to eliminate distractions from our roadways, why not ban them all? Summers could justifiably expand the proposal to include a ban on smoking in the car, adjusting the radio or inserting a Britney Spears CD, eating fast food, scolding the rug rats in the backseat, talking with your spouse, shaving or applying makeup, doing the crossword puzzle, using a laptop computer, calling for on-screen directions to Starbucks, and rehearsing your excuse that explains your tardiness to the boss.
Could we really ban Britney Spears CDs? I digress.
Before the law is done with revisions, no common person will be able to read and understand it, and mainly, drivers will just continue to take their chances.
This begs the significant philosophical question: Why bother?
Isn't it sufficient that citations can already be issued if the use of a cell phone is the cause of an accident? Why pile on? No harm, no foul: If the use of a cell phone isn't endangering anyone in the moment, why penalize for the harm that was not caused?
Ah, the law is to be a deterrent, to eliminate the possibility of harm. But won't it also become more than that? How much of a stretch is it to envision police pulling over drivers who endanger nobody on a deserted road at 11pm, but who are guilty of making a cell call, just so the officer can meet his monthly quota? Isn't that a harm all its own?
Say, if the police pull a driver over to the side of the road, isn't that the sort of distraction that could cause an accident? It should be banned!
Let's hope this Bill dies in committee. If it passes, Summers will run for re-election in 2006 on the basis of having produced this wonderful law? and of having been suitably busy.
Mike Kole is chair of the Libertarian Party of Hamilton County (Noblesville) and candidate for Secretary of State (2006).
Libertarian Writers' Bureau http://www.writersbureau.org
home cleaning services Deerfield ..Iran's objection to ratifying the International Atomic Energy Agency's Additional... Read More
Fifteen hours is a tremendous barrier. It is the obstacle... Read More
"The only time I open my mouth is when I... Read More
I am personally calling for a total disbanding of the... Read More
"Similar to Medieval Inquisitions, judges have been given the authority,... Read More
Federal Regulations on Business Destroy America, these regulations are a... Read More
For a short time I worked as a union officer... Read More
Hitler received a legacy from his Rothschild relations in Vienna... Read More
United Liberation Front of Assam (ULFA), one of the most... Read More
Well we have certainly been reading a lot about prison... Read More
There are many types of fuels besides that gasoline we... Read More
Year Item Price Rate of Inflation 03/80 Gasoline (per gallon)... Read More
What is the so-called "nuclear option" that Senator Bill Frist... Read More
Let's make one thing clear: This Dan Nelson Automotive fiasco... Read More
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Was created on July 30th 2002, by... Read More
The end of another election once again brings into focus... Read More
I've been thinking again. I know some of my readers... Read More
Recently in Maine, I talked with a gentleman and we... Read More
I have to be honest. It is time to come... Read More
It can be dangerous to engage in free speech. This... Read More
As we reel from the news of the recent bombings... Read More
The newest pebble reactors are easy to build and manage... Read More
You are not going to believe what is going on... Read More
Alexander Hamilton ? Policy Separated from Politics:I am related to... Read More
"It is the duty of every citizen according to his... Read More
recurring housekeeping Highland Park ..Recently scientists have been watching the exponential growth of marine... Read More
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Was created on July 30th 2002, by... Read More
With the recent threats from Bin Laden and Al Queda... Read More
It is time for a change. A change in philosophy,... Read More
I, too, am saddened by the disaster in New Orleans... Read More
In Belarus parliament is going to struggle with degeneration of... Read More
In a recent report on the status of the Franchising... Read More
Environmentalists say GM Seeds are bad for the environment, dangerous... Read More
Americans pride themselves on being the best, that's a fact.... Read More
Well having studying the need for decreasing America's dependence on... Read More
In his bid for the presidency, John Kerry pronounced a... Read More
The notion that local governments should have almost total monopoly... Read More
As the Baby Boomer Generation continue to get older, one... Read More
The entry by telephone and cable companies into the Internet... Read More
The European Court of Justice ("ECJ") ruled in Praktiker Bau-... Read More
Many of the problems that the members of the European... Read More
Incompetence is all too obvious at the trade shows of... Read More
The new law "Special Protective, Antidumping and Import Compensatory Measures"... Read More
Ethanol is a great way to produce fuel, great fuel... Read More
What is the so-called "nuclear option" that Senator Bill Frist... Read More
Recently I met a man in a coffee shop, a... Read More
Legislation was introduced into Congress this week that would establish... Read More
As we watch fewer Americans voting it is no wonder... Read More
When Boris Yeltsin spoke about an experiment that 'they' wrought... Read More
Rational, sober, logical citizens wonder what exactly the terrorists want.... Read More
Political |