The Bill of Rights to our Constitution caused -- and still causes ? some contradiction, confusion and danger with the Constitution itself. It is unfortunate that a bill of rights was included with the Constitution. Due to a general misunderstanding about the Constitution at the time of its ratification, a bill of rights was added to the Constitution in order to obtain ratification of the Constitution itself:
"In the course of the foregoing review of the Constitution I have taken notice of, and endeavored to answer most of the objections which have appeared against it. There, however, remain a few which either did not fall naturally under any particular head or were forgotten in their proper places. These shall now be discussed. ? The most considerable of these remaining objections is that the Constitution of the convention contains no bill or rights." Alexander Hamilton, Federalist Papers #84.
Indeed, during the convention itself, a motion to prepare a bill of rights to the Constitution was "passed unanimously in the negative." September 12, 1787; Notes Of Debates In The Federal Convention Of 1787 Reported By James Madison.
But why no bill of rights?
"A minute detail of particular rights is certainly far less applicable to a Constitution like that under consideration, which is merely intended to regulate the general political interests of the nation, than to a constitution which has the regulation of every species of personal and private concerns.
It has been several times truly remarked that bills of rights are, in their origin, stipulations between kings and their subjects, abridgements of prerogative in favor of privilege, reservations of rights not surrendered to the prince. Such was Magna Carta, obtained by the barons, sword in hand, from King John. Such was the subsequent confirmation of that charter by subsequent princes. Such was the Petition of Right assented to by Charles the First in the beginning of his reign. Such, also, was the Declaration of Right presented by the Lords and Commons to the Prince of Orange in 1688, and afterwards thrown into the form of an act of Parliament called the Bill of Rights.
It is evident, therefore, that, according to primitive signification, they have no application to constitutions, professedly founded upon the power of the people and executed by their immediate representatives and servants. Here in strictness, the people surrender nothing; and as they retain everything, they have no need of particular reservations.
The truth is, after all the declamations we have heard, that the Constitution is itself, in every rational sense, and to every useful, a bill of rights. The several bills of rights in Great Britain form its Constitution; and conversely, the constitution of each State is its bill of rights. And the proposed Constitution, if adopted, will be the bill of rights of the Union." Alexander Hamilton, Federalist Papers #84.
However, in the debates of the state conventions, the most criticized feature of the Constitution, voiced by the opposition, was the lack of a bill or rights:
"One criticism repeatedly advanced (against the Constitution) was the absence of a bill of rights. This matter had been discussed very briefly on the floor of the Philadelphia Convention, where George Mason had introduced a resolution, supported by Elbridge Gerry, to appoint a committee to prepare a bill of rights. Roger Sherman had replied briefly that the various state constitutions already had bills of rights, which should prove sufficient under the new government, and Mason's motion had then been defeated 10 to 0. But in the ratification controversy, absence of a federal bill of rights became a focal point of attack upon the Constitution by the Antifederalists, who pointed out that since the new government had a sphere of sovereignty of its own and functioned directly upon individuals, the absence of a bill of rights prepared the way for encroachments upon the liberties of the people.
The absence of a bill of rights proved a bargaining point for the Federalists in some of the state conventions, for they were able to pledge the adoption of a new bill or rights by amendment once the new government was established. In several conventions, among them those in Massachusetts, New York, and Virginia, the Federalists at the last moment won over certain moderates in the opposition with this understanding. Several of the state conventions submitted proposed amendments containing bills of rights at the time that they ratified. These were made the basis of the first ten amendments to the Constitution, adopted by Congress in 1789 and by the states within two years after the establishment of the new government." The American Constitution; Its Origins And Development, 5th Edition, by Alfred H. Kelly and Winfred A. Harbison, 1976, pp. 142-143.
And what danger did and does the Bill of Rights present with the Constitution itself?
"Bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers which are not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted. For why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do?
Why, for instance, should it be said that the liberty of the press shall not be restrained, when no power is given by which restrictions may be imposed? I will not contend that such a provision would confer a regulating power; but it is evident that it would furnish, to men disposed to usurp, a plausible pretense for claiming that power. They might urge, with a semblance of reason, that the Constitution ought not to be charged with the absurdity of providing against the abuse of an authority which was not given, and that the provision against restraining the liberty of the press afforded a clear implication that a power to prescribe proper regulations concerning it was intended to be vested in the national government. This may serve as a specimen of the numerous handles which would be given to the doctrine of constructive powers, by the indulgence of an injudicious zeal for bills of rights." Alexander Hamilton, Federalist Papers #84.
To maintain the integrity of the Constitution an amendment was drafted and included in The Bill of Rights. It reads:
"The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." Amendment 9, Constitution of the United States.
Its inclusion was to prevent the rights listed in the other amendments (as well as those amendments which have been added since then) from being construed as the only rights of the people.? Indeed, the constitutional operation of the federal government would be exactly the same if The Bill of Rights were not there at all.
However, The Bill of Rights is a part of the Constitution. A result of a comprise based upon a misunderstanding of the Constitution itself.
_________________________________
? See Griswold v. State of Connecticut: 381 U.S. 479, 486-493, at footnote 4 (concurring opinion of Justice Goldberg, The Chief Justice, and Justice Brennan) [1965] get case
? 1993 Daniel Joseph Goodman
Questions? Comments! get case
Dan Goodman, known as J.D. Goodman or "J.D." is a legal researcher. Other articles authored by "J.D." relating to the area of law are, How Well Do Know The Constitution and State Citizenship Is Alive And Well.
Like doing your own legal research. I invite you to try my website, The Legal Connection, at get case.
This article is written to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is written with the understanding that the author is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or, other professional service. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
The author, therefore, disclaims any responsibility for any liability or loss incurred as a consequence of the use and application, either directly or indirectly of any information presented herein.
family-safe home cleaners Northbrook ..Veterans Affairs Employees using government credit cards on personal items?... Read More
The TSA seems to have completely missed the ball at... Read More
There are so many problems with our perceived perfect checks... Read More
I'm getting a little tired of being lectured by that... Read More
We have known of the innate characteristic need of members... Read More
I am not an African-American. Don't call me an African... Read More
Do you really want to get ahead in your life?... Read More
This is the fourth and final article in a series... Read More
For anyone who wishes to become an armchair General in... Read More
Most citizens agree that we need the Federal Trade Commission... Read More
Capitalism as the social structure was founded in order to... Read More
In the event of that a threatening nation to the... Read More
Wealth Distribution is often discussed at length in periodicals such... Read More
Here is an interesting thought; Corn to make Plastic An... Read More
As we watch fewer Americans voting it is no wonder... Read More
I just got done reading a series of articles dating... Read More
Believe it or not, every theatre, church, or Britney Spears... Read More
I am personally calling for a total disbanding of the... Read More
The debate to raise minimum wage in California is totally... Read More
Forest Vegetation Simulations for Fire Prevention, Healthy Forest and Saving... Read More
Back-Dooring the CSIS:The US and Israel have admitted they back-doored... Read More
The recent first round of the Iranian elections somewhat resembled... Read More
Thought of the day; Questions about the judicial system. If... Read More
The United States is losing its industrial capacity quite rapidly.... Read More
This is a thought on the study of Home and... Read More
residential cleaning services Deerfield ..The great people of the United States of America deserve... Read More
As global warming continues to escalate the concerns of today's... Read More
Sizing up North Korea is important for a war there.... Read More
I. OVERVIEWIn the wake of the September 11 terrorist attacks... Read More
At the start of the US involvement in WWII Joseph... Read More
Fifteen hours is a tremendous barrier. It is the obstacle... Read More
Do you really want to get ahead in your life?... Read More
The United States is losing its industrial capacity quite rapidly.... Read More
We recently saw another ferry accident, this one in NY... Read More
Are you happy with all this so-called security after 9-11?... Read More
The gun control debate in America is a battle between... Read More
With pain rocking through my whole body today, I cast... Read More
The new law "Special Protective, Antidumping and Import Compensatory Measures"... Read More
I've been thinking again. I know some of my readers... Read More
You know now that North Korea is backing down on... Read More
As the populations expand in Colorado outside of Denver, Las... Read More
Incompetence is all too obvious at the trade shows of... Read More
An article in Information Week in January 14, 2002 discussed... Read More
With the recent shakeups in the presidential cabinet, it has... Read More
Down The Bush and BlairBy now everyone, except us, is... Read More
Many very nice and loving homosexual male couples want to... Read More
The Jihad against the Western World will continue. It will... Read More
Introduction:Although politicians and so-called "Intelligence Experts" are the ones appearing... Read More
Many had made mention of the problems of business opportunities... Read More
The evacuation of Gaza is now completed, and the world... Read More
Political |