The Bill of Rights to our Constitution caused -- and still causes ? some contradiction, confusion and danger with the Constitution itself. It is unfortunate that a bill of rights was included with the Constitution. Due to a general misunderstanding about the Constitution at the time of its ratification, a bill of rights was added to the Constitution in order to obtain ratification of the Constitution itself:
"In the course of the foregoing review of the Constitution I have taken notice of, and endeavored to answer most of the objections which have appeared against it. There, however, remain a few which either did not fall naturally under any particular head or were forgotten in their proper places. These shall now be discussed. ? The most considerable of these remaining objections is that the Constitution of the convention contains no bill or rights." Alexander Hamilton, Federalist Papers #84.
Indeed, during the convention itself, a motion to prepare a bill of rights to the Constitution was "passed unanimously in the negative." September 12, 1787; Notes Of Debates In The Federal Convention Of 1787 Reported By James Madison.
But why no bill of rights?
"A minute detail of particular rights is certainly far less applicable to a Constitution like that under consideration, which is merely intended to regulate the general political interests of the nation, than to a constitution which has the regulation of every species of personal and private concerns.
It has been several times truly remarked that bills of rights are, in their origin, stipulations between kings and their subjects, abridgements of prerogative in favor of privilege, reservations of rights not surrendered to the prince. Such was Magna Carta, obtained by the barons, sword in hand, from King John. Such was the subsequent confirmation of that charter by subsequent princes. Such was the Petition of Right assented to by Charles the First in the beginning of his reign. Such, also, was the Declaration of Right presented by the Lords and Commons to the Prince of Orange in 1688, and afterwards thrown into the form of an act of Parliament called the Bill of Rights.
It is evident, therefore, that, according to primitive signification, they have no application to constitutions, professedly founded upon the power of the people and executed by their immediate representatives and servants. Here in strictness, the people surrender nothing; and as they retain everything, they have no need of particular reservations.
The truth is, after all the declamations we have heard, that the Constitution is itself, in every rational sense, and to every useful, a bill of rights. The several bills of rights in Great Britain form its Constitution; and conversely, the constitution of each State is its bill of rights. And the proposed Constitution, if adopted, will be the bill of rights of the Union." Alexander Hamilton, Federalist Papers #84.
However, in the debates of the state conventions, the most criticized feature of the Constitution, voiced by the opposition, was the lack of a bill or rights:
"One criticism repeatedly advanced (against the Constitution) was the absence of a bill of rights. This matter had been discussed very briefly on the floor of the Philadelphia Convention, where George Mason had introduced a resolution, supported by Elbridge Gerry, to appoint a committee to prepare a bill of rights. Roger Sherman had replied briefly that the various state constitutions already had bills of rights, which should prove sufficient under the new government, and Mason's motion had then been defeated 10 to 0. But in the ratification controversy, absence of a federal bill of rights became a focal point of attack upon the Constitution by the Antifederalists, who pointed out that since the new government had a sphere of sovereignty of its own and functioned directly upon individuals, the absence of a bill of rights prepared the way for encroachments upon the liberties of the people.
The absence of a bill of rights proved a bargaining point for the Federalists in some of the state conventions, for they were able to pledge the adoption of a new bill or rights by amendment once the new government was established. In several conventions, among them those in Massachusetts, New York, and Virginia, the Federalists at the last moment won over certain moderates in the opposition with this understanding. Several of the state conventions submitted proposed amendments containing bills of rights at the time that they ratified. These were made the basis of the first ten amendments to the Constitution, adopted by Congress in 1789 and by the states within two years after the establishment of the new government." The American Constitution; Its Origins And Development, 5th Edition, by Alfred H. Kelly and Winfred A. Harbison, 1976, pp. 142-143.
And what danger did and does the Bill of Rights present with the Constitution itself?
"Bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers which are not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted. For why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do?
Why, for instance, should it be said that the liberty of the press shall not be restrained, when no power is given by which restrictions may be imposed? I will not contend that such a provision would confer a regulating power; but it is evident that it would furnish, to men disposed to usurp, a plausible pretense for claiming that power. They might urge, with a semblance of reason, that the Constitution ought not to be charged with the absurdity of providing against the abuse of an authority which was not given, and that the provision against restraining the liberty of the press afforded a clear implication that a power to prescribe proper regulations concerning it was intended to be vested in the national government. This may serve as a specimen of the numerous handles which would be given to the doctrine of constructive powers, by the indulgence of an injudicious zeal for bills of rights." Alexander Hamilton, Federalist Papers #84.
To maintain the integrity of the Constitution an amendment was drafted and included in The Bill of Rights. It reads:
"The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." Amendment 9, Constitution of the United States.
Its inclusion was to prevent the rights listed in the other amendments (as well as those amendments which have been added since then) from being construed as the only rights of the people.? Indeed, the constitutional operation of the federal government would be exactly the same if The Bill of Rights were not there at all.
However, The Bill of Rights is a part of the Constitution. A result of a comprise based upon a misunderstanding of the Constitution itself.
_________________________________
? See Griswold v. State of Connecticut: 381 U.S. 479, 486-493, at footnote 4 (concurring opinion of Justice Goldberg, The Chief Justice, and Justice Brennan) [1965] get case
? 1993 Daniel Joseph Goodman
Questions? Comments! get case
Dan Goodman, known as J.D. Goodman or "J.D." is a legal researcher. Other articles authored by "J.D." relating to the area of law are, How Well Do Know The Constitution and State Citizenship Is Alive And Well.
Like doing your own legal research. I invite you to try my website, The Legal Connection, at get case.
This article is written to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is written with the understanding that the author is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or, other professional service. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
The author, therefore, disclaims any responsibility for any liability or loss incurred as a consequence of the use and application, either directly or indirectly of any information presented herein.
limousine service Round Lake .. Lockport Chicago limo O’HareWhen I was growing up, I actually considered a career... Read More
I would like to discuss the blocked persons list of... Read More
Sarbaines Oxley was probably the easiest way to destroy free... Read More
Water Conservation in larger cities is less of an issue... Read More
Tulipmania - this is the name coined for the first... Read More
Recently a friend insisted that I read a book by... Read More
Ohio's transportation sector seems to be strong, even with Ohio's... Read More
The evacuation of Gaza is now completed, and the world... Read More
The prosecutors in the Martha Stewart Case used testimony from... Read More
INTRODUCTIONPERHAPS the sentiments contained in the following pages, are not... Read More
It looks overall like the liberals are advocating for no... Read More
Why are intelligent people so afraid of the idea that... Read More
An American soldier is taken behind enemy lines and brainwashed... Read More
Judgment and detective work requires thinking about possibilities. One of... Read More
With pain rocking through my whole body today, I cast... Read More
In order to build a stronger, more self-sufficient America, America... Read More
1) IS HAVING A DEMOCRACY MORE EFFECTIVE IN ADDRESSING POLITICAL... Read More
THE ROSICRUCIAN COUNCIL OF THREE:A Thelema/OTO leader who became a... Read More
From the National Association of Realtors' Virtual Office Website policy,... Read More
As global warming continues to escalate the concerns of today's... Read More
Fuel costs seem to rank high in surveys of US... Read More
Journalism, as it is often said, is the 'fourth branch... Read More
United Liberation Front of Assam (ULFA), one of the most... Read More
"Rugged individualism" is actually a euphemism for Thomas Hobbes' baseless... Read More
In his bid for the presidency, John Kerry pronounced a... Read More
St. Charles cheap limo service ..The Randolphs:Peyton Randolph was the first President of the United... Read More
We have known of the innate characteristic need of members... Read More
Few understand the Franchising Format and even fewer have correlated... Read More
This is the first of a series of four articles... Read More
As concerns grow over the threat of bioterrorism and weapons... Read More
In the fields of juvenile justice policy and programming, there... Read More
WE MUST PUT A STOP TO THE EVER-INCREASING PRICE OF... Read More
Why President Bush should have his second term? The arguments... Read More
The number of countries in the world at the moment... Read More
Why is it that every single thing government does; it... Read More
The Federal Trade Commission in their latest move to increase... Read More
In typical bureaucratese, the pensive EBRD analyst ventures with the... Read More
Recently on C-SPAN, there were two gentlemen debating free trade... Read More
Kudos goes out to the George Walker Bush's Administration and... Read More
We are seeing some trade wars brewing as American trade... Read More
Contrary to the Hobbesian prediction of anarchy (freedom) and brutish... Read More
In an age of terrorism, guerilla and total warfare the... Read More
The US Homeland Security is worried about Hydrofoil or Skimmer... Read More
As we reel from the news of the recent bombings... Read More
The United States is losing its industrial capacity quite rapidly.... Read More
"When you are right you cannot be too radical; when... Read More
"Similar to Medieval Inquisitions, judges have been given the authority,... Read More
Some people say that we cannot put a colony on... Read More
Websites designed to help people overcome their gambling addictions have... Read More
Tax Evasion has been used to criminalize many, Nixon did... Read More
Political |