Rush is right! The government's stepped up bid to regulate broadcast television content is indeed frightening. Limbaugh made his comments during one of his regular radio broadcasts last year. Those remarks were in response to the FCC's crackdown on broadcast indecency and Congress' threats to hand out much larger fines to broadcasters for such violations, in the wake of Janet Jackson's "wardrobe malfunction" at the Super Bowl halftime show last February.
Limbaugh is the not only media personality alarmed by this intensified government scrutiny of television content. At the beginning of his news program on CNN during that same time frame, Aaron Brown said he thought the only thing worse than Jackson's Super Bowl debacle is the fact that the government is now getting involved in trying to prevent similar incidents in the future. Amen, Aaron!
Television, like any other business in a capitalistic society like ours, is and should be governed by the marketplace and the laws of supply and demand. I would love to see more family-friendly television programming. However, if there were truly a great demand for it, there would naturally be a lot more of it in existence (as well as a lot less of the offensive stuff). The folks who are pushing the hardest for greater government intervention to make TV more family-friendly will assert that they are in the majority of viewers and listeners in the U.S. However, the facts belie this assertion.
Of the seven broadcast networks, PAX, widely recognized as the most family-friendly, is last in the ratings. It's not just last, it is dead last! PAX gets about one-fourth of the audience of the sixth place network! Even in places that don't have a local PAX affiliate, it is usually available as a cable channel. However, it's not even among the 30 top-rated cable channels. On the other hand, some of the TV shows and cable networks with the most controversial material get the highest ratings. Go figure.
In reality, those who are clamoring the loudest for TV to "clean up its act" know they are in the minority. Instead of tuning their TVs to PAX or one of the other tamer channels (as I do) or even turning their TVs completely off, they go running to the government to force their tastes on everyone else. Oddly enough, most of these people consider themselves conservatives. Funny, I thought conservatives disdained government intervention in favor of allowing the marketplace to take its course. Where did I ever get such a silly idea?
What these people seemingly don't realize is that their efforts could very well backfire on them and all the rest of us. Broadcasters have generally submitted to the concepts of the V-chip and content ratings to help parents regulate their children's TV viewing in their homes. After all, isn't that what all of this hoopla is about? They have also meekly accepted reasonable fines from time to time for indecent broadcasts. However, the vocal minority is now demanding that the FCC and Congress play hardball, i.e., impose very large and numerous fines as well as revoking the licenses of stations found guilty of indecent broadcasts. In response to this demand, there are now bills circulating in both houses of Congress that would increase fines to the range of $250,000 to $3 million per violation along with threatening license revocation for habitual offenders.
Many people forget that the FCC and Congress are not the final arbiters of these matters. The courts are. In the past, the courts have vigorously defended the First Amendment and I believe they will continue this trend. By playing hardball, the FCC and Congress will leave broadcasters with no other option but to take them to court. Even though the courts have, in the past, upheld the FCC's reasonable jurisdiction over broadcast TV, things could change if the government's newly attempted heavy-handed penalties are challenged. Long ago, the courts stripped away the government's "right" to regulate indecency on cable and satellite channels. If the government decides it really wants to play hardball with broadcasters, it could ultimately lose any jurisdiction over broadcast content as well.
But let's suppose the government's more restrictive regulations are upheld by the courts. That's definitely a possibility. However, because of the greatly increase fines and the possibility of license revocation, the courts will likely force the FCC to be more specific and draw up more detailed indecency guidelines. They are currently vague, to say the least.
I'll use the following illustration to demonstrate how vague the FCC's current guidelines really are. Let's suppose that none of the roads or highways we all drive on everyday had posted speed limits. Instead, let's suppose they just had signs warning us not to drive too fast. Then let's suppose that the police were allowed to subjectively write tickets whenever they thought someone was driving too fast, but would never actually define what they thought "too fast" really was. That's similar to how the FCC operates. It doesn't provide any specific guidelines and only investigates a claim of indecency when someone files a complaint. It never explicitly states what a broadcaster can and cannot do.
Now, going back to our speeding analogy, let's suppose that we (along with the courts) tolerated this kind of speed enforcement because the fines were relatively small and no one's license was ever revoked. However, what do you think would happen if the governing authority decided to greatly increase the fines for speeding and allow the possibility of license revocations for such violations, without giving us specific speed limits? We would not stand still for such a thing and neither would the courts. Posted speed limits would be mandated.
With the FCC forced to write more specific rules governing indecency, it could find itself in a very precarious position. If, for example, the FCC strictly forbids specific words from being used and/or specific body parts from being shown on broadcast TV, it will invite another court battle that it will probably lose. However, if it explicitly lists situations in which certain words can be used and/or certain body parts can be shown, broadcasters will begin to find loopholes in these rules and exploit them. We all know that the more specific a law or rule is, the easier it is to find loopholes in it.
The bottom line is that more aggressive enforcement of indecency regulations on broadcast TV and radio could backfire and actually lead to even racier content. Members of Congress would be advised to look before they leap.
Terry Mitchell is a software engineer, freelance writer, and trivia buff from Hopewell, VA. He also serves as a political columnist for American Daily and operates his own website - http://www.commenterry.com - on which he posts commentaries on various subjects such as politics, technology, religion, health and well-being, personal finance, and sports. His commentaries offer a unique point of view that is not often found in mainstream media.
limo prices to midway Crystal Lake west of Randal .. Lockport Chicago limo O’HareThe offshore financial centres have been forced in recent years... Read More
IT'S NO LONGER NEWS THAT CHINA IS BECOMING A MAJOR... Read More
You, the reader, should be aware of my affluence of... Read More
I have to be honest. It is time to come... Read More
Currently the United States has weapons, which can shoot around... Read More
Ohio's transportation sector seems to be strong, even with Ohio's... Read More
If someone wanted to farm future clones they would need... Read More
Bill Cosby got it wrong. His many speeches regarding the... Read More
Our Airports have excess capacity, which is not being used... Read More
Where are all the high-speed trains we were promised? Where... Read More
Our government is set up like a modern day franchise.... Read More
In 1966, Dr. Carroll Quigley, a professor of history at... Read More
"It is the duty of every citizen according to his... Read More
Fuel costs seem to rank high in surveys of US... Read More
I have witnessed a new era of security in the... Read More
Many of those who wish to fight for our country... Read More
The CBR taxes the Pakistani source income of nonresident individuals... Read More
An American soldier is taken behind enemy lines and brainwashed... Read More
The globalist's are the new breed, the new generation if... Read More
Policemen in many US cities are taking their new authority... Read More
The newest pebble reactors are easy to build and manage... Read More
As I read the papers and watch the news day... Read More
Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter to Lafayette in 1823 that... Read More
United Liberation Front of Assam (ULFA), one of the most... Read More
Many in the peanut gallery of society are so quick... Read More
taxi o'hare Auburn ..When North Americans discuss Cuba, they always focus the intense... Read More
I am noticing an increasing and alarming rate to which... Read More
For a short time I worked as a union officer... Read More
In what the Americans love to describe as the war... Read More
Our trade deficit is directly proportional to our attacks on... Read More
One third of all fertilized eggs spontaneously abort and are... Read More
One question not addressed in GM Crops and Monsanto Terminator... Read More
The United States is losing its industrial capacity quite rapidly.... Read More
The official figures are staggering: 35% of the workforce -... Read More
This, of course, is a political decision. There is no... Read More
The Right's defense of John Thune in the Dan Nelson/MetaBank... Read More
In years past California Mutual Assistance Program and emergency response... Read More
To be justified, taxes should satisfy a few conditions:Above all,... Read More
The North American Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was implemented on January... Read More
From the National Association of Realtors' Virtual Office Website policy,... Read More
The European Court of Justice ("ECJ") ruled in Praktiker Bau-... Read More
Everyone knows the United States Government often falls down in... Read More
Many very nice and loving homosexual male couples want to... Read More
The CBR taxes the Pakistani source income of nonresident individuals... Read More
One of Abraham Lincoln's claims to fame is the fact... Read More
The organic farmers are angry that Monsantos terminator GM seeds... Read More
I. WARS ARE BASIC CONFLICTS OVER LAND. II. BOUNDARIES. THE... Read More
In today's Rants from Lance session I address the question... Read More
Tulipmania - this is the name coined for the first... Read More
-The Protocol plan 'will remain invisible until the moment when... Read More
Political |