Is the only way to fight Fundamentalist Extremists becoming one yourself? Having grown up in a liberal democracy, being educated in the ideals of freedom of speech and expression, diversity, multi-culturalism and the political correctness that stems from such a comprehensive education, I find myself questioning whether I am a closet fascist when it comes to the way in which the British Judiciary are referring to the whole issue surrounding the London suicide bombers of 7 July and the related legal news stories stemming from this.
I cannot understand the logic of the British Judiciary in countering the British Government's call for the expulsion of a number of foreign nationals specifically identified as contributing to anti-British feeling amongst the Muslim community. For example, one of the people due for expulsion is Abu Qatada, a Jordanian who has been tried and convicted in his absence in Jordanian courts for terrorism and given a life sentence. He is known as Osama bin Laden's 'Ambassador in Europe'. Now he is concerned that if he is returned to Jordan he will face the death sentence. The question becomes one of whether we can expel someone from Britain to what may be their death? While we don't know the details of his Jordanian convictions, terrorism in the Middle East tends to be pretty deadly, so it is fair to suspect this person has been convicted of something relating to people being killed.
This is where liberal ideals and common-sense conflict ? while we may agree in Human Rights Law, is it so wrong if we don't care that this man is being sent back to what might be his death? When someone commits themselves to terrorism, do they give up their right to justice when they so blatantly abuse it? How can we allow someone to rely on Human Rights law when they have so obviously overlooked the human rights of everyone else in the country? On a more local level, why do we have someone at liberty in Britain who has been convicted of terrorism in another country? Why were they being granted freedom of speech, and freedom to gather audiences, when it was known that they had fundamentalist tendencies and links with terrorist organisations? Is it our policy in Britain to say 'welcome to Britain and feel free to hate our society and way of life?'
It would be wrong to withdraw many of our fundamental human rights such as freedom of speech because we are scared of what people might say ? but surely when there is evidence that people have gone beyond what are acceptable societal boundaries then they need to be restrained in one way or another. Is this not what the new anti-terrorism provisions are seeking to do? Finding a way of tackling fundamentalism without resorting to fascism is going to require some common-sense in terms of interpreting the law.
Nobody wants to see a repeat of the shooting of the innocent Brazilian on the underground system, but neither do people want to encounter suicide bombers. For years there have been critical news reports on Isreali soldiers shooting Palestinians who they believed to be suicide bombers, many of whom may have been innocent, as well as reports of suicide bombers blowing themselves up in buses and bars ? now the reality of this is hitting Britain. There is no way to stop a suicide bomber but to kill them before they detonate themselves. Equally, there is no way of being absolutely sure that somebody is a suicide bomber until they actually detonate themselves. There lies the Catch 22 which will dominate the British legal system for years to come. Here we believe that someone is innocent until proven guilty, but by the time a suicide bomber is proven guilty it is too late.
So where does this leave us? If we can identify the underlying factions that are stirring up fundamentalist ideals, is it not common-sense that we either imprison or deport them? Even the Muslim Council of Great Britain supports such moves. However, we need to make sure that the extremists don't win by lulling us into a fascist state out of fear, and hence we become what they are propagating we already are. It will be common-sense that wins, not fascism, but it needs to be applied through the judicial system, not just in Government.
Eddie Blass is a freelance academic and ghostwriter specialising in business & management, futures, legal, and educational issues.
Wood Dale Chicago prom limo .. Lockport Chicago limo O’HareAs I read the papers and watch the news day... Read More
Entrepreneurs can clean up the environment if we would let... Read More
In order to win the presidency in America, candidates must... Read More
Journalism, as it is often said, is the 'fourth branch... Read More
We have brain drain issues in Silicon Valley, we have... Read More
So you are ready to run for public office are... Read More
Heaven, Hell, or some sort of Purgatory.I cannot seem to... Read More
We have heard a lot about the coming bird flu... Read More
The FTC franchising division purports their law enforcement experience in... Read More
The United States is losing its industrial capacity quite rapidly.... Read More
Roberto Calvo Macias, a young author and thinker from Spain,... Read More
I. The FactsJust days before a much-awaited donor conference, the... Read More
While many Pennsylvanians are struggling to figure out how they... Read More
The official working week is being reduced to 35 hours... Read More
Today we have a new franchise report from the Federal... Read More
As concerns grow over the threat of bioterrorism and weapons... Read More
Well having studying the need for decreasing America's dependence on... Read More
The great people of the United States of America deserve... Read More
This is the second of a series of four articles... Read More
Just as everyone has breathed a sigh of relief at... Read More
It is widely known in the Homosexual Male Populations that... Read More
Sarbaines Oxley was probably the easiest way to destroy free... Read More
On June 16, 1972, a security guard at the Watergate... Read More
I hear it all the time; you can't say that.... Read More
What depth of blind insanity has inflicted itself upon Israel's... Read More
Antigo wedding limo ..In many reports we see that the Federal Trade Commission... Read More
Prison guards and corrections professionals are hard at work insuring... Read More
The Right's defense of John Thune in the Dan Nelson/MetaBank... Read More
In the fields of juvenile justice policy and programming, there... Read More
Well having studying the need for decreasing America's dependence on... Read More
I hear it all the time; you can't say that.... Read More
Conor MacDari was a Mason but his Masonry deplored the... Read More
There are many issues on the minds of US voters... Read More
Why are we over regulating the franchising industry? What are... Read More
When this president's father was in the Oval Office, he... Read More
An idea to defend oil infrastructure in the Middle East... Read More
Tonight I resigned myself to the fact that this is... Read More
The TSA seems to have completely missed the ball at... Read More
Recently the CIA staged a practice simulation of a cyber... Read More
As global warming continues to escalate the concerns of today's... Read More
The US Dollar has been falling continuously in last year.... Read More
Societies have always had a problem of what to do... Read More
The use of religion is well-documented as a social engineering... Read More
Why is it that every single thing government does; it... Read More
Is the Federal Trade Commission really stopping SPAM? Is the... Read More
We see today a fierce unspoken competition between trucks and... Read More
We should all give much kudos to the Federal Trade... Read More
This brings to our consciousness, issues concerning the ever rising... Read More
Roberto Calvo Macias, a young author and thinker from Spain,... Read More
Iran's objection to ratifying the International Atomic Energy Agency's Additional... Read More
Political |