Is the only way to fight Fundamentalist Extremists becoming one yourself? Having grown up in a liberal democracy, being educated in the ideals of freedom of speech and expression, diversity, multi-culturalism and the political correctness that stems from such a comprehensive education, I find myself questioning whether I am a closet fascist when it comes to the way in which the British Judiciary are referring to the whole issue surrounding the London suicide bombers of 7 July and the related legal news stories stemming from this.
I cannot understand the logic of the British Judiciary in countering the British Government's call for the expulsion of a number of foreign nationals specifically identified as contributing to anti-British feeling amongst the Muslim community. For example, one of the people due for expulsion is Abu Qatada, a Jordanian who has been tried and convicted in his absence in Jordanian courts for terrorism and given a life sentence. He is known as Osama bin Laden's 'Ambassador in Europe'. Now he is concerned that if he is returned to Jordan he will face the death sentence. The question becomes one of whether we can expel someone from Britain to what may be their death? While we don't know the details of his Jordanian convictions, terrorism in the Middle East tends to be pretty deadly, so it is fair to suspect this person has been convicted of something relating to people being killed.
This is where liberal ideals and common-sense conflict ? while we may agree in Human Rights Law, is it so wrong if we don't care that this man is being sent back to what might be his death? When someone commits themselves to terrorism, do they give up their right to justice when they so blatantly abuse it? How can we allow someone to rely on Human Rights law when they have so obviously overlooked the human rights of everyone else in the country? On a more local level, why do we have someone at liberty in Britain who has been convicted of terrorism in another country? Why were they being granted freedom of speech, and freedom to gather audiences, when it was known that they had fundamentalist tendencies and links with terrorist organisations? Is it our policy in Britain to say 'welcome to Britain and feel free to hate our society and way of life?'
It would be wrong to withdraw many of our fundamental human rights such as freedom of speech because we are scared of what people might say ? but surely when there is evidence that people have gone beyond what are acceptable societal boundaries then they need to be restrained in one way or another. Is this not what the new anti-terrorism provisions are seeking to do? Finding a way of tackling fundamentalism without resorting to fascism is going to require some common-sense in terms of interpreting the law.
Nobody wants to see a repeat of the shooting of the innocent Brazilian on the underground system, but neither do people want to encounter suicide bombers. For years there have been critical news reports on Isreali soldiers shooting Palestinians who they believed to be suicide bombers, many of whom may have been innocent, as well as reports of suicide bombers blowing themselves up in buses and bars ? now the reality of this is hitting Britain. There is no way to stop a suicide bomber but to kill them before they detonate themselves. Equally, there is no way of being absolutely sure that somebody is a suicide bomber until they actually detonate themselves. There lies the Catch 22 which will dominate the British legal system for years to come. Here we believe that someone is innocent until proven guilty, but by the time a suicide bomber is proven guilty it is too late.
So where does this leave us? If we can identify the underlying factions that are stirring up fundamentalist ideals, is it not common-sense that we either imprison or deport them? Even the Muslim Council of Great Britain supports such moves. However, we need to make sure that the extremists don't win by lulling us into a fascist state out of fear, and hence we become what they are propagating we already are. It will be common-sense that wins, not fascism, but it needs to be applied through the judicial system, not just in Government.
Eddie Blass is a freelance academic and ghostwriter specialising in business & management, futures, legal, and educational issues.
maid service near Lake Forest ..How many legs does a dog have if you call... Read More
1) IS HAVING A DEMOCRACY MORE EFFECTIVE IN ADDRESSING POLITICAL... Read More
Due to the bizarre weather patterns this winter California got... Read More
Many are quick to point out the benefits of religion... Read More
Americans pride themselves on being the best, that's a fact.... Read More
The FBI recently before Congress stated that Eco-Terrorism was on... Read More
An idea to defend oil infrastructure in the Middle East... Read More
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Was created on July 30th 2002, by... Read More
Michael Moore asserts the following in his political film Fahrenheit... Read More
There are no stupid questions, only stupid people. Ask an... Read More
An irresponsible Chinese General made a very telling comment recently.... Read More
Sarbaines Oxley was probably the easiest way to destroy free... Read More
In every national budget, there is a part called "Public... Read More
Roberto Calvo Macias, a young author and thinker from Spain,... Read More
There are many mines around the world, which are owned... Read More
With elections on the horizon and Blair looking tired and... Read More
I, too, am saddened by the disaster in New Orleans... Read More
..."history may judge us to be the real bully if,... Read More
The most exciting event in Slovenia last week was when... Read More
Previously Senator Dick Armey and his staff in 2000 to... Read More
I would like to pose a question. I am unsure... Read More
It appears the Feds are suing Elliot Spitzer over his... Read More
Heaven, Hell, or some sort of Purgatory.I cannot seem to... Read More
Japan lit its candles of pure, "noble sadness" on the... Read More
If we go hog wild towards the liberal agenda where... Read More
top rated cleaning service Des Plaines ..In these times when states are suffering extreme downward pressure... Read More
Do you find it interesting that people complain about the... Read More
I am personally calling for a total disbanding of the... Read More
It appears the Feds are suing Elliot Spitzer over his... Read More
Iran's objection to ratifying the International Atomic Energy Agency's Additional... Read More
There are so many problems with our perceived perfect checks... Read More
For many years now, I have been the proud holder... Read More
I applaud Monsanto for their R and D. I would... Read More
Former Senator, Daniel Moynihan, accurately summed up the situation when... Read More
SYNOD OF DRUM CEATT (494 - 5):It is interesting to... Read More
I, too, am saddened by the disaster in New Orleans... Read More
Q. Should the Government be concerned if the CPI rises... Read More
There is a lot of debate about who made the... Read More
An interesting conversation that I thought I must share with... Read More
Today we wish to examine a fallacy, or error in... Read More
So you are ready to run for public office are... Read More
Most modern day media stories containing fear, controversy and chaos... Read More
The UAV, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle is hear to stay and... Read More
Quit paying the DEA to chase marijuana. We could save... Read More
Einstein when ask how did he believe WWIII would be... Read More
I would like to discuss a few issues we have... Read More
The gun control debate in America is a battle between... Read More
The Republican Party became popular due to its view on... Read More
There is something egregiously wrong about a government that will... Read More
The CBR taxes the Pakistani source income of nonresident individuals... Read More
Political |