Is the only way to fight Fundamentalist Extremists becoming one yourself? Having grown up in a liberal democracy, being educated in the ideals of freedom of speech and expression, diversity, multi-culturalism and the political correctness that stems from such a comprehensive education, I find myself questioning whether I am a closet fascist when it comes to the way in which the British Judiciary are referring to the whole issue surrounding the London suicide bombers of 7 July and the related legal news stories stemming from this.
I cannot understand the logic of the British Judiciary in countering the British Government's call for the expulsion of a number of foreign nationals specifically identified as contributing to anti-British feeling amongst the Muslim community. For example, one of the people due for expulsion is Abu Qatada, a Jordanian who has been tried and convicted in his absence in Jordanian courts for terrorism and given a life sentence. He is known as Osama bin Laden's 'Ambassador in Europe'. Now he is concerned that if he is returned to Jordan he will face the death sentence. The question becomes one of whether we can expel someone from Britain to what may be their death? While we don't know the details of his Jordanian convictions, terrorism in the Middle East tends to be pretty deadly, so it is fair to suspect this person has been convicted of something relating to people being killed.
This is where liberal ideals and common-sense conflict ? while we may agree in Human Rights Law, is it so wrong if we don't care that this man is being sent back to what might be his death? When someone commits themselves to terrorism, do they give up their right to justice when they so blatantly abuse it? How can we allow someone to rely on Human Rights law when they have so obviously overlooked the human rights of everyone else in the country? On a more local level, why do we have someone at liberty in Britain who has been convicted of terrorism in another country? Why were they being granted freedom of speech, and freedom to gather audiences, when it was known that they had fundamentalist tendencies and links with terrorist organisations? Is it our policy in Britain to say 'welcome to Britain and feel free to hate our society and way of life?'
It would be wrong to withdraw many of our fundamental human rights such as freedom of speech because we are scared of what people might say ? but surely when there is evidence that people have gone beyond what are acceptable societal boundaries then they need to be restrained in one way or another. Is this not what the new anti-terrorism provisions are seeking to do? Finding a way of tackling fundamentalism without resorting to fascism is going to require some common-sense in terms of interpreting the law.
Nobody wants to see a repeat of the shooting of the innocent Brazilian on the underground system, but neither do people want to encounter suicide bombers. For years there have been critical news reports on Isreali soldiers shooting Palestinians who they believed to be suicide bombers, many of whom may have been innocent, as well as reports of suicide bombers blowing themselves up in buses and bars ? now the reality of this is hitting Britain. There is no way to stop a suicide bomber but to kill them before they detonate themselves. Equally, there is no way of being absolutely sure that somebody is a suicide bomber until they actually detonate themselves. There lies the Catch 22 which will dominate the British legal system for years to come. Here we believe that someone is innocent until proven guilty, but by the time a suicide bomber is proven guilty it is too late.
So where does this leave us? If we can identify the underlying factions that are stirring up fundamentalist ideals, is it not common-sense that we either imprison or deport them? Even the Muslim Council of Great Britain supports such moves. However, we need to make sure that the extremists don't win by lulling us into a fascist state out of fear, and hence we become what they are propagating we already are. It will be common-sense that wins, not fascism, but it needs to be applied through the judicial system, not just in Government.
Eddie Blass is a freelance academic and ghostwriter specialising in business & management, futures, legal, and educational issues.
cleaning service near Bannockburn ..Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter to Lafayette in 1823 that... Read More
The UnbornWith all this cloning in the news one can't... Read More
Many very nice and loving homosexual male couples want to... Read More
The globalist's are the new breed, the new generation if... Read More
Iran's objection to ratifying the International Atomic Energy Agency's Additional... Read More
Most citizens agree that we need the Federal Trade Commission... Read More
A coffee shop conversation about a Great Country in Historic... Read More
Our trade deficit is directly proportional to our attacks on... Read More
Well many have complained that the FBI and CIA dropped... Read More
Many parents might think it a bit farfetched to compare... Read More
There is debate about the methodology of forestry and also... Read More
It looks overall like the liberals are advocating for no... Read More
At the start of the US involvement in WWII Joseph... Read More
These leaders like the Rothschilds who backed Crowley's Hermetic Order... Read More
Recently I got to talking with a gentleman at a... Read More
You say, you want to help the Palestinians, but most... Read More
News is spreading of the retirement of Supreme Court Justice... Read More
It appears the Feds are suing Elliot Spitzer over his... Read More
Up until the final debate at Arizona State University, the... Read More
Having been to every city in the country over the... Read More
Corporate America has been shaken recently by lawsuits and criminal... Read More
Recent international wars and the often spectacular ways in which... Read More
With gasoline prices at the pump climbing strongly into the... Read More
Question: Dr. Vaknin ? is it true that you are... Read More
Few understand the Franchising Format and even fewer have correlated... Read More
pet-friendly home cleaners Mundelein ....."history may judge us to be the real bully if,... Read More
The paper industry in the US is hurting. Due to... Read More
Many non-profit groups are feeling upset that they are allowed... Read More
The expertise and advancement of the evolution of man and... Read More
Recently scientists have been watching the exponential growth of marine... Read More
In Police Magazine I read a great article about transient... Read More
America must implement a policy on Election Reform that is... Read More
It is important as populations expand to work on the... Read More
This is no time for the Black community to sue... Read More
Our Hydro-electricity accounts for some 20% of our current needs.... Read More
Public utilities and a problematic issue on the allowance of... Read More
In Belarus parliament is going to struggle with degeneration of... Read More
City Governments is their quest for; "quality of life" often... Read More
America has some monetary issues, which need to be addressed.... Read More
The Republican Party became popular due to its view on... Read More
The United States has enemies, which call the country the... Read More
The United States has never done a full study on... Read More
In response to Douglas Bower's article; Logic Class 101 Applied... Read More
Many parents might think it a bit farfetched to compare... Read More
Is the Federal Trade Commission really stopping SPAM? Is the... Read More
An idea to defend oil infrastructure in the Middle East... Read More
Rufus King: (Said to be the fifth most important person... Read More
Ok, here is what happened: On March 31, 2005, Pat... Read More
Capitalism as the social structure was founded in order to... Read More
Large parts of the world today suffer from a severe... Read More
Political |