Is the only way to fight Fundamentalist Extremists becoming one yourself? Having grown up in a liberal democracy, being educated in the ideals of freedom of speech and expression, diversity, multi-culturalism and the political correctness that stems from such a comprehensive education, I find myself questioning whether I am a closet fascist when it comes to the way in which the British Judiciary are referring to the whole issue surrounding the London suicide bombers of 7 July and the related legal news stories stemming from this.
I cannot understand the logic of the British Judiciary in countering the British Government's call for the expulsion of a number of foreign nationals specifically identified as contributing to anti-British feeling amongst the Muslim community. For example, one of the people due for expulsion is Abu Qatada, a Jordanian who has been tried and convicted in his absence in Jordanian courts for terrorism and given a life sentence. He is known as Osama bin Laden's 'Ambassador in Europe'. Now he is concerned that if he is returned to Jordan he will face the death sentence. The question becomes one of whether we can expel someone from Britain to what may be their death? While we don't know the details of his Jordanian convictions, terrorism in the Middle East tends to be pretty deadly, so it is fair to suspect this person has been convicted of something relating to people being killed.
This is where liberal ideals and common-sense conflict ? while we may agree in Human Rights Law, is it so wrong if we don't care that this man is being sent back to what might be his death? When someone commits themselves to terrorism, do they give up their right to justice when they so blatantly abuse it? How can we allow someone to rely on Human Rights law when they have so obviously overlooked the human rights of everyone else in the country? On a more local level, why do we have someone at liberty in Britain who has been convicted of terrorism in another country? Why were they being granted freedom of speech, and freedom to gather audiences, when it was known that they had fundamentalist tendencies and links with terrorist organisations? Is it our policy in Britain to say 'welcome to Britain and feel free to hate our society and way of life?'
It would be wrong to withdraw many of our fundamental human rights such as freedom of speech because we are scared of what people might say ? but surely when there is evidence that people have gone beyond what are acceptable societal boundaries then they need to be restrained in one way or another. Is this not what the new anti-terrorism provisions are seeking to do? Finding a way of tackling fundamentalism without resorting to fascism is going to require some common-sense in terms of interpreting the law.
Nobody wants to see a repeat of the shooting of the innocent Brazilian on the underground system, but neither do people want to encounter suicide bombers. For years there have been critical news reports on Isreali soldiers shooting Palestinians who they believed to be suicide bombers, many of whom may have been innocent, as well as reports of suicide bombers blowing themselves up in buses and bars ? now the reality of this is hitting Britain. There is no way to stop a suicide bomber but to kill them before they detonate themselves. Equally, there is no way of being absolutely sure that somebody is a suicide bomber until they actually detonate themselves. There lies the Catch 22 which will dominate the British legal system for years to come. Here we believe that someone is innocent until proven guilty, but by the time a suicide bomber is proven guilty it is too late.
So where does this leave us? If we can identify the underlying factions that are stirring up fundamentalist ideals, is it not common-sense that we either imprison or deport them? Even the Muslim Council of Great Britain supports such moves. However, we need to make sure that the extremists don't win by lulling us into a fascist state out of fear, and hence we become what they are propagating we already are. It will be common-sense that wins, not fascism, but it needs to be applied through the judicial system, not just in Government.
Eddie Blass is a freelance academic and ghostwriter specialising in business & management, futures, legal, and educational issues.
detailed home cleaning Lake Forest ..The Carl Rove issue is definitely interesting and distracting. The... Read More
News is spreading of the retirement of Supreme Court Justice... Read More
You have probably heard of the Sarbaines Oxley Law (SOX)... Read More
The United States and other first world nations have been... Read More
Forest Vegetation Simulations for Fire Prevention, Healthy Forest and Saving... Read More
Our government is set up like a modern day franchise.... Read More
Just as everyone has breathed a sigh of relief at... Read More
The debate to raise minimum wage in California is totally... Read More
The cause of America is in a great measure the... Read More
A few hours ago, Colonel Ely Ould Mohamed Vall, the... Read More
Iran's objection to ratifying the International Atomic Energy Agency's Additional... Read More
Many had made mention of the problems of business opportunities... Read More
The head of the Club of Rome has said that... Read More
Many folks who are pro-NASA and Pro-Space Colonies say that... Read More
The Federal Trade Commission has very important Anti-trust Laws. They... Read More
The Right's defense of John Thune in the Dan Nelson/MetaBank... Read More
Recently I got to talking with a gentleman at a... Read More
Here are some miscellaneous thoughts on issues many of which... Read More
Introduction:Although politicians and so-called "Intelligence Experts" are the ones appearing... Read More
Societies have always had a problem of what to do... Read More
Using Harmonic Beams to Pre-Detonate Shoulder Launched Surface to Air... Read More
Any chances for a country to be ruled by alternative... Read More
The resignation from cabinet yesterday, Sunday, by the Israeli minister... Read More
President Bush and Secretary Powell should hang their heads in... Read More
Maybe some of the people complaining ought to go to... Read More
trusted cleaning company Des Plaines ..Elliot Spitzer, recently said he wanted to drive a stake... Read More
In order to build a stronger, more self-sufficient America, America... Read More
Recent international wars and the often spectacular ways in which... Read More
Last week, I began my look ahead to the 2008... Read More
Q. Should the Government be concerned if the CPI rises... Read More
After the dance the piper must be paid. To help... Read More
Recently in Maine, I talked with a gentleman and we... Read More
For years I have been amazed as I've listened to... Read More
In a recent report on the status of the Franchising... Read More
-The Protocol plan 'will remain invisible until the moment when... Read More
Fifteen hours is a tremendous barrier. It is the obstacle... Read More
Their arrival portends rising local prices and a culture shock.... Read More
In an effort to assist our political leadership it would... Read More
I would like to discuss a few issues we have... Read More
Do you find it interesting that people complain about the... Read More
On June 16, 1972, a security guard at the Watergate... Read More
Iran has threatened to raise America's fuel prices again. They... Read More
We are seeing some trade wars brewing as American trade... Read More
Fuel costs seem to rank high in surveys of US... Read More
In 1966, Dr. Carroll Quigley, a professor of history at... Read More
Perhaps a silent revolution is taking place, this time more... Read More
The entry by telephone and cable companies into the Internet... Read More
Blessed with Chinese GDP growth rates (7-8% annually in each... Read More
Why did FDR say Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and Count... Read More
A governing.com report blast one of the major grassroots initiatives... Read More
Political |