Is the only way to fight Fundamentalist Extremists becoming one yourself? Having grown up in a liberal democracy, being educated in the ideals of freedom of speech and expression, diversity, multi-culturalism and the political correctness that stems from such a comprehensive education, I find myself questioning whether I am a closet fascist when it comes to the way in which the British Judiciary are referring to the whole issue surrounding the London suicide bombers of 7 July and the related legal news stories stemming from this.
I cannot understand the logic of the British Judiciary in countering the British Government's call for the expulsion of a number of foreign nationals specifically identified as contributing to anti-British feeling amongst the Muslim community. For example, one of the people due for expulsion is Abu Qatada, a Jordanian who has been tried and convicted in his absence in Jordanian courts for terrorism and given a life sentence. He is known as Osama bin Laden's 'Ambassador in Europe'. Now he is concerned that if he is returned to Jordan he will face the death sentence. The question becomes one of whether we can expel someone from Britain to what may be their death? While we don't know the details of his Jordanian convictions, terrorism in the Middle East tends to be pretty deadly, so it is fair to suspect this person has been convicted of something relating to people being killed.
This is where liberal ideals and common-sense conflict ? while we may agree in Human Rights Law, is it so wrong if we don't care that this man is being sent back to what might be his death? When someone commits themselves to terrorism, do they give up their right to justice when they so blatantly abuse it? How can we allow someone to rely on Human Rights law when they have so obviously overlooked the human rights of everyone else in the country? On a more local level, why do we have someone at liberty in Britain who has been convicted of terrorism in another country? Why were they being granted freedom of speech, and freedom to gather audiences, when it was known that they had fundamentalist tendencies and links with terrorist organisations? Is it our policy in Britain to say 'welcome to Britain and feel free to hate our society and way of life?'
It would be wrong to withdraw many of our fundamental human rights such as freedom of speech because we are scared of what people might say ? but surely when there is evidence that people have gone beyond what are acceptable societal boundaries then they need to be restrained in one way or another. Is this not what the new anti-terrorism provisions are seeking to do? Finding a way of tackling fundamentalism without resorting to fascism is going to require some common-sense in terms of interpreting the law.
Nobody wants to see a repeat of the shooting of the innocent Brazilian on the underground system, but neither do people want to encounter suicide bombers. For years there have been critical news reports on Isreali soldiers shooting Palestinians who they believed to be suicide bombers, many of whom may have been innocent, as well as reports of suicide bombers blowing themselves up in buses and bars ? now the reality of this is hitting Britain. There is no way to stop a suicide bomber but to kill them before they detonate themselves. Equally, there is no way of being absolutely sure that somebody is a suicide bomber until they actually detonate themselves. There lies the Catch 22 which will dominate the British legal system for years to come. Here we believe that someone is innocent until proven guilty, but by the time a suicide bomber is proven guilty it is too late.
So where does this leave us? If we can identify the underlying factions that are stirring up fundamentalist ideals, is it not common-sense that we either imprison or deport them? Even the Muslim Council of Great Britain supports such moves. However, we need to make sure that the extremists don't win by lulling us into a fascist state out of fear, and hence we become what they are propagating we already are. It will be common-sense that wins, not fascism, but it needs to be applied through the judicial system, not just in Government.
Eddie Blass is a freelance academic and ghostwriter specialising in business & management, futures, legal, and educational issues.
licensed cleaning services Park Ridge ..Our government is set up like a modern day franchise.... Read More
A few hours ago, Colonel Ely Ould Mohamed Vall, the... Read More
Currently the US Army is having trouble recruiting. These problems... Read More
Capitalism as the social structure was founded in order to... Read More
Lecture given at the Netherlands Economic Institute (NEI) on 18/4/2001Human... Read More
WE MUST PUT A STOP TO THE EVER-INCREASING PRICE OF... Read More
In response to Douglas Bower's article; Logic Class 101 Applied... Read More
Conor MacDari was a Mason but his Masonry deplored the... Read More
The current political efforts aimed at improving the American public... Read More
The other day I was sucker punched, hoodwinked, bamboozled, had... Read More
Federal Trade Commission Owes Industry and Entrepreneurs an Apology. The... Read More
Rufus King: (Said to be the fifth most important person... Read More
Recently the Los Angeles Transit workers are on Strike and... Read More
Presently Universities and Private Enterprise are working to build more... Read More
Even the most devout proponents of free marketry and hidden... Read More
The problem of poverty in America comes as a surprise.... Read More
Many of those who wish to fight for our country... Read More
I would like to discuss the blocked persons list of... Read More
As the death toll in the avalanche-hit Jammu and Kashmir... Read More
In the future when we decide to help nations vote... Read More
These leaders like the Rothschilds who backed Crowley's Hermetic Order... Read More
Many Americans feel betrayed by their government, our government. I... Read More
In the fields of juvenile justice policy and programming, there... Read More
It cities across America water is an issue, the flow... Read More
There are no stupid questions, only stupid people. Ask an... Read More
on demand house cleaning Arlington Heights ..An interesting conversation that I thought I must share with... Read More
In years past California Mutual Assistance Program and emergency response... Read More
Rush is right! The government's stepped up bid to regulate... Read More
OH MAN!Here we go again. I guess now the "proof... Read More
We have known of the innate characteristic need of members... Read More
This is the first of a series of four articles... Read More
As more and more cities and states set up websites... Read More
The TSA seems to have completely missed the ball at... Read More
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Was created on July 30th 2002, by... Read More
Mexico the country of Salsa, Tortillas and Corruption; I first... Read More
In a move that rocked the online world and left... Read More
Our government is set up like a modern day franchise.... Read More
The organic farmers are angry that Monsantos terminator GM seeds... Read More
After arranging the Armistice that ended or settled outstanding issues... Read More
I'm getting a little tired of being lectured by that... Read More
Is Ohio Manufacturing Sector really unable to compete in the... Read More
The most damaging factor to our economy today is the... Read More
The evacuation of Gaza is now completed, and the world... Read More
How much oil can travel through a pipeline? It depends... Read More
Many very nice and loving homosexual male couples want to... Read More
Kudos goes out to the George Walker Bush's Administration and... Read More
For the business community 9-11 changed everything. In our company,... Read More
The Right's defense of John Thune in the Dan Nelson/MetaBank... Read More
The filibuster as a political delaying tactic has been a... Read More
September 11, 2001 could have been prevented. We could have... Read More
Political |