Is the only way to fight Fundamentalist Extremists becoming one yourself? Having grown up in a liberal democracy, being educated in the ideals of freedom of speech and expression, diversity, multi-culturalism and the political correctness that stems from such a comprehensive education, I find myself questioning whether I am a closet fascist when it comes to the way in which the British Judiciary are referring to the whole issue surrounding the London suicide bombers of 7 July and the related legal news stories stemming from this.
I cannot understand the logic of the British Judiciary in countering the British Government's call for the expulsion of a number of foreign nationals specifically identified as contributing to anti-British feeling amongst the Muslim community. For example, one of the people due for expulsion is Abu Qatada, a Jordanian who has been tried and convicted in his absence in Jordanian courts for terrorism and given a life sentence. He is known as Osama bin Laden's 'Ambassador in Europe'. Now he is concerned that if he is returned to Jordan he will face the death sentence. The question becomes one of whether we can expel someone from Britain to what may be their death? While we don't know the details of his Jordanian convictions, terrorism in the Middle East tends to be pretty deadly, so it is fair to suspect this person has been convicted of something relating to people being killed.
This is where liberal ideals and common-sense conflict ? while we may agree in Human Rights Law, is it so wrong if we don't care that this man is being sent back to what might be his death? When someone commits themselves to terrorism, do they give up their right to justice when they so blatantly abuse it? How can we allow someone to rely on Human Rights law when they have so obviously overlooked the human rights of everyone else in the country? On a more local level, why do we have someone at liberty in Britain who has been convicted of terrorism in another country? Why were they being granted freedom of speech, and freedom to gather audiences, when it was known that they had fundamentalist tendencies and links with terrorist organisations? Is it our policy in Britain to say 'welcome to Britain and feel free to hate our society and way of life?'
It would be wrong to withdraw many of our fundamental human rights such as freedom of speech because we are scared of what people might say ? but surely when there is evidence that people have gone beyond what are acceptable societal boundaries then they need to be restrained in one way or another. Is this not what the new anti-terrorism provisions are seeking to do? Finding a way of tackling fundamentalism without resorting to fascism is going to require some common-sense in terms of interpreting the law.
Nobody wants to see a repeat of the shooting of the innocent Brazilian on the underground system, but neither do people want to encounter suicide bombers. For years there have been critical news reports on Isreali soldiers shooting Palestinians who they believed to be suicide bombers, many of whom may have been innocent, as well as reports of suicide bombers blowing themselves up in buses and bars ? now the reality of this is hitting Britain. There is no way to stop a suicide bomber but to kill them before they detonate themselves. Equally, there is no way of being absolutely sure that somebody is a suicide bomber until they actually detonate themselves. There lies the Catch 22 which will dominate the British legal system for years to come. Here we believe that someone is innocent until proven guilty, but by the time a suicide bomber is proven guilty it is too late.
So where does this leave us? If we can identify the underlying factions that are stirring up fundamentalist ideals, is it not common-sense that we either imprison or deport them? Even the Muslim Council of Great Britain supports such moves. However, we need to make sure that the extremists don't win by lulling us into a fascist state out of fear, and hence we become what they are propagating we already are. It will be common-sense that wins, not fascism, but it needs to be applied through the judicial system, not just in Government.
Eddie Blass is a freelance academic and ghostwriter specialising in business & management, futures, legal, and educational issues.
elite cleaning services Des Plaines ..All UAVs Need a Self Destruct BLOS DeviceWhat do you... Read More
The current field of political sciences is dominated by a... Read More
The resignation from cabinet yesterday, Sunday, by the Israeli minister... Read More
The filibuster as a political delaying tactic has been a... Read More
UK Water RatesYOU CANNOT BE DISCONNECTED FOR WATER RATES DEBTSWater... Read More
The European Court of Justice ("ECJ") ruled in Praktiker Bau-... Read More
I, too, am saddened by the disaster in New Orleans... Read More
(Note: This article was written slightly before the 2004 election;... Read More
With the recent threats from Bin Laden and Al Queda... Read More
Prosecutors with political ambitions are known to modify the truth... Read More
For anyone who wishes to become an armchair General in... Read More
Where are all the high-speed trains we were promised? Where... Read More
We are slowing the transportation flows of our civilization by... Read More
Since the court case was over turned against Arthur Anderson... Read More
Recently a friend insisted that I read a book by... Read More
Sodomy is against the law, yet goes on every day... Read More
Perhaps a silent revolution is taking place, this time more... Read More
How can any human being today, anywhere in this world,... Read More
I. The FactsJust days before a much-awaited donor conference, the... Read More
The Palestinian Fatah Movement is doing whatever it can to... Read More
Aren't you glad you purchased Alaska? You got a bargain,... Read More
OH MAN!Here we go again. I guess now the "proof... Read More
Back-Dooring the CSIS:The US and Israel have admitted they back-doored... Read More
Predicting the future is a tricky business. There have been... Read More
After arranging the Armistice that ended or settled outstanding issues... Read More
eco-friendly cleaning service Buffalo Grove ..Environmentalists say GM Seeds are bad for the environment, dangerous... Read More
The other day I was sucker punched, hoodwinked, bamboozled, had... Read More
The globalist's are the new breed, the new generation if... Read More
Peace in the Middle East - whoa that is a... Read More
The Justice Department is at it again; promoting themselves in... Read More
I heard on the news this week how America continues... Read More
Why did FDR say Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and Count... Read More
When this president's father was in the Oval Office, he... Read More
Are you happy with all this so-called security after 9-11?... Read More
INTRODUCTIONPERHAPS the sentiments contained in the following pages, are not... Read More
Journalism, as it is often said, is the 'fourth branch... Read More
This, of course, is a political decision. There is no... Read More
There is something egregiously wrong about a government that will... Read More
Is it just me or are you concerned that illegal... Read More
Some call it the "unofficial" or "informal" economy, others call... Read More
With respect to the States' databases, you may not locate... Read More
Many of the problems that the members of the European... Read More
There are no stupid questions, only stupid people. Ask an... Read More
This is the second of a series of four articles... Read More
Q. Should the Government be concerned if the CPI rises... Read More
Handing over power to Vladimir Putin in 1999, Boris Yeltsin... Read More
When Boris Yeltsin spoke about an experiment that 'they' wrought... Read More
Recently on C-SPAN, there were two gentlemen debating free trade... Read More
As I read the papers and watch the news day... Read More
City Governments is their quest for; "quality of life" often... Read More
Political |