Is the only way to fight Fundamentalist Extremists becoming one yourself? Having grown up in a liberal democracy, being educated in the ideals of freedom of speech and expression, diversity, multi-culturalism and the political correctness that stems from such a comprehensive education, I find myself questioning whether I am a closet fascist when it comes to the way in which the British Judiciary are referring to the whole issue surrounding the London suicide bombers of 7 July and the related legal news stories stemming from this.
I cannot understand the logic of the British Judiciary in countering the British Government's call for the expulsion of a number of foreign nationals specifically identified as contributing to anti-British feeling amongst the Muslim community. For example, one of the people due for expulsion is Abu Qatada, a Jordanian who has been tried and convicted in his absence in Jordanian courts for terrorism and given a life sentence. He is known as Osama bin Laden's 'Ambassador in Europe'. Now he is concerned that if he is returned to Jordan he will face the death sentence. The question becomes one of whether we can expel someone from Britain to what may be their death? While we don't know the details of his Jordanian convictions, terrorism in the Middle East tends to be pretty deadly, so it is fair to suspect this person has been convicted of something relating to people being killed.
This is where liberal ideals and common-sense conflict ? while we may agree in Human Rights Law, is it so wrong if we don't care that this man is being sent back to what might be his death? When someone commits themselves to terrorism, do they give up their right to justice when they so blatantly abuse it? How can we allow someone to rely on Human Rights law when they have so obviously overlooked the human rights of everyone else in the country? On a more local level, why do we have someone at liberty in Britain who has been convicted of terrorism in another country? Why were they being granted freedom of speech, and freedom to gather audiences, when it was known that they had fundamentalist tendencies and links with terrorist organisations? Is it our policy in Britain to say 'welcome to Britain and feel free to hate our society and way of life?'
It would be wrong to withdraw many of our fundamental human rights such as freedom of speech because we are scared of what people might say ? but surely when there is evidence that people have gone beyond what are acceptable societal boundaries then they need to be restrained in one way or another. Is this not what the new anti-terrorism provisions are seeking to do? Finding a way of tackling fundamentalism without resorting to fascism is going to require some common-sense in terms of interpreting the law.
Nobody wants to see a repeat of the shooting of the innocent Brazilian on the underground system, but neither do people want to encounter suicide bombers. For years there have been critical news reports on Isreali soldiers shooting Palestinians who they believed to be suicide bombers, many of whom may have been innocent, as well as reports of suicide bombers blowing themselves up in buses and bars ? now the reality of this is hitting Britain. There is no way to stop a suicide bomber but to kill them before they detonate themselves. Equally, there is no way of being absolutely sure that somebody is a suicide bomber until they actually detonate themselves. There lies the Catch 22 which will dominate the British legal system for years to come. Here we believe that someone is innocent until proven guilty, but by the time a suicide bomber is proven guilty it is too late.
So where does this leave us? If we can identify the underlying factions that are stirring up fundamentalist ideals, is it not common-sense that we either imprison or deport them? Even the Muslim Council of Great Britain supports such moves. However, we need to make sure that the extremists don't win by lulling us into a fascist state out of fear, and hence we become what they are propagating we already are. It will be common-sense that wins, not fascism, but it needs to be applied through the judicial system, not just in Government.
Eddie Blass is a freelance academic and ghostwriter specialising in business & management, futures, legal, and educational issues.
executive chauffeured services Bradford .. Madison to Airport carThe cause of America is in a great measure the... Read More
Recently I met a man in a coffee shop, a... Read More
With elections on the horizon and Blair looking tired and... Read More
Since the United States Government is promoting the whistle blower... Read More
Dust from Deserts and Particulate ControlThe greatest contributor to particulate... Read More
Publicity is correlative to your position in the community. Seldom... Read More
Ethanol is a great way to produce fuel, great fuel... Read More
We need a government that can be as responsive to... Read More
The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) estimated that there were... Read More
Without the flow of fuel our very mobile society comes... Read More
Many environmentalists are against roads through the forest because it... Read More
I. OVERVIEWIn the wake of the September 11 terrorist attacks... Read More
I believe it would be good for the economy for... Read More
Roberto Calvo Macias, a young author and thinker from Spain,... Read More
30 years ago, California, later followed by other states, decided... Read More
The official figures are staggering: 35% of the workforce -... Read More
Recently the CIA staged a practice simulation of a cyber... Read More
Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, has... Read More
The second amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees every American... Read More
Iran's objection to ratifying the International Atomic Energy Agency's Additional... Read More
[Author's Note: Another essay that I wrote on notebook paper... Read More
Most politicians are completely out to lunch and totally Machiavellian... Read More
It is amazing we have so many men, who belong... Read More
If someone wanted to farm future clones they would need... Read More
Which companies are most affected by fuel? Who really bears... Read More
O'Hare Chicago prom limo ..The furore in the BJP camp in India, triggered by... Read More
For more than a decade, you the American taxpayer have... Read More
One question not addressed in GM Crops and Monsanto Terminator... Read More
The notion that local governments should have almost total monopoly... Read More
Some people say that we cannot put a colony on... Read More
There are so many problems with our perceived perfect checks... Read More
Many MLM sales people mean well but they inadvertently commit... Read More
"Like humans void of soul or mind, they jeered and... Read More
Kudos goes out to the George Walker Bush's Administration and... Read More
Recent international wars and the often spectacular ways in which... Read More
I'm starting to feel squeezed by all the political correctness... Read More
One way to increase evaporation in the ocean might be... Read More
Just as everyone has breathed a sigh of relief at... Read More
News is spreading of the retirement of Supreme Court Justice... Read More
With respect to the States' databases, you may not locate... Read More
The Connecticut Conference of Municipalities (CCM) is interested in the... Read More
Policemen in many US cities are taking their new authority... Read More
1. United States of America (USA)In the United States, legislation... Read More
The Federal trade Commission has a rule, which says that... Read More
Is the only way to fight Fundamentalist Extremists becoming one... Read More
I had the benefit of getting an interview with Mr.... Read More
There are many mines around the world, which are owned... Read More
Revitalization Downtown projects are all the rage in fact the... Read More
The CBR taxes the Pakistani source income of nonresident individuals... Read More
I hope to provide a starting point for the serious... Read More
Political |