Is the only way to fight Fundamentalist Extremists becoming one yourself? Having grown up in a liberal democracy, being educated in the ideals of freedom of speech and expression, diversity, multi-culturalism and the political correctness that stems from such a comprehensive education, I find myself questioning whether I am a closet fascist when it comes to the way in which the British Judiciary are referring to the whole issue surrounding the London suicide bombers of 7 July and the related legal news stories stemming from this.
I cannot understand the logic of the British Judiciary in countering the British Government's call for the expulsion of a number of foreign nationals specifically identified as contributing to anti-British feeling amongst the Muslim community. For example, one of the people due for expulsion is Abu Qatada, a Jordanian who has been tried and convicted in his absence in Jordanian courts for terrorism and given a life sentence. He is known as Osama bin Laden's 'Ambassador in Europe'. Now he is concerned that if he is returned to Jordan he will face the death sentence. The question becomes one of whether we can expel someone from Britain to what may be their death? While we don't know the details of his Jordanian convictions, terrorism in the Middle East tends to be pretty deadly, so it is fair to suspect this person has been convicted of something relating to people being killed.
This is where liberal ideals and common-sense conflict ? while we may agree in Human Rights Law, is it so wrong if we don't care that this man is being sent back to what might be his death? When someone commits themselves to terrorism, do they give up their right to justice when they so blatantly abuse it? How can we allow someone to rely on Human Rights law when they have so obviously overlooked the human rights of everyone else in the country? On a more local level, why do we have someone at liberty in Britain who has been convicted of terrorism in another country? Why were they being granted freedom of speech, and freedom to gather audiences, when it was known that they had fundamentalist tendencies and links with terrorist organisations? Is it our policy in Britain to say 'welcome to Britain and feel free to hate our society and way of life?'
It would be wrong to withdraw many of our fundamental human rights such as freedom of speech because we are scared of what people might say ? but surely when there is evidence that people have gone beyond what are acceptable societal boundaries then they need to be restrained in one way or another. Is this not what the new anti-terrorism provisions are seeking to do? Finding a way of tackling fundamentalism without resorting to fascism is going to require some common-sense in terms of interpreting the law.
Nobody wants to see a repeat of the shooting of the innocent Brazilian on the underground system, but neither do people want to encounter suicide bombers. For years there have been critical news reports on Isreali soldiers shooting Palestinians who they believed to be suicide bombers, many of whom may have been innocent, as well as reports of suicide bombers blowing themselves up in buses and bars ? now the reality of this is hitting Britain. There is no way to stop a suicide bomber but to kill them before they detonate themselves. Equally, there is no way of being absolutely sure that somebody is a suicide bomber until they actually detonate themselves. There lies the Catch 22 which will dominate the British legal system for years to come. Here we believe that someone is innocent until proven guilty, but by the time a suicide bomber is proven guilty it is too late.
So where does this leave us? If we can identify the underlying factions that are stirring up fundamentalist ideals, is it not common-sense that we either imprison or deport them? Even the Muslim Council of Great Britain supports such moves. However, we need to make sure that the extremists don't win by lulling us into a fascist state out of fear, and hence we become what they are propagating we already are. It will be common-sense that wins, not fascism, but it needs to be applied through the judicial system, not just in Government.
Eddie Blass is a freelance academic and ghostwriter specialising in business & management, futures, legal, and educational issues.
personalized cleaning services Mundelein ..Often we see protests at the sites of global leader... Read More
The NSA failed the American people and allowed the attack... Read More
Year Item Price Rate of Inflation 03/80 Gasoline (per gallon)... Read More
Fifteen hours is a tremendous barrier. It is the obstacle... Read More
I just got done reading a series of articles dating... Read More
Regarding the de-regulation of energy, this is not such a... Read More
"Similar to Medieval Inquisitions, judges have been given the authority,... Read More
Recently the Los Angeles Transit workers are on Strike and... Read More
An interesting conversation that I thought I must share with... Read More
We see today a fierce unspoken competition between trucks and... Read More
Last Summer the Federal Trade Commission came out with a... Read More
Tulipmania - this is the name coined for the first... Read More
Currently the US Army is having trouble recruiting. These problems... Read More
Many in the peanut gallery of society are so quick... Read More
Any chances for a country to be ruled by alternative... Read More
How do you feel about Terminator Seeds from Monsanto? I... Read More
If a farmer plants the same crop three seasons in... Read More
The new law "Special Protective, Antidumping and Import Compensatory Measures"... Read More
Ohio's transportation sector seems to be strong, even with Ohio's... Read More
We are seeing some trade wars brewing as American trade... Read More
Judgment and detective work requires thinking about possibilities. One of... Read More
Few understand the Franchising Format and even fewer have correlated... Read More
Water Conservation in larger cities is less of an issue... Read More
Japan lit its candles of pure, "noble sadness" on the... Read More
Fearful that terrorists will next target Australia, Prime Minister John... Read More
one time home cleaning Buffalo Grove ..Three years ago I published a book of short stories... Read More
Originally published in 1958, "The Ugly American" (Lederer & Burdick)... Read More
1) IS HAVING A DEMOCRACY MORE EFFECTIVE IN ADDRESSING POLITICAL... Read More
I hope to provide a starting point for the serious... Read More
What has really changed in the housing market with regards... Read More
Tonight I resigned myself to the fact that this is... Read More
The Federal Trade Commission in their latest move to increase... Read More
All government regulators or diplomat who are in high risk... Read More
Lecture given at the Netherlands Economic Institute (NEI) on 18/4/2001Human... Read More
Ethanol is a great way to produce fuel, great fuel... Read More
[Author's Note: Another essay that I wrote on notebook paper... Read More
The Iranian elections are certainly interesting indeed. The ruling party... Read More
At the start of the US involvement in WWII Joseph... Read More
The Presidents Before Washington:From the moment that the first Declaration... Read More
Policemen in many US cities are taking their new authority... Read More
For anyone who wishes to become an armchair General in... Read More
News is spreading of the retirement of Supreme Court Justice... Read More
In the future when we decide to help nations vote... Read More
The TSA seems to have completely missed the ball at... Read More
The Flow of Trade is a major consideration of civilizations... Read More
Non-lethal Goo Concepts have been tossed around by many war... Read More
Let the reader be reminded, that this document we are... Read More
President George W. Bush has unofficially won his re-election bid... Read More
Let's put the religious part of the debate for a... Read More
I heard on the news this week how America continues... Read More
Political |