Is the only way to fight Fundamentalist Extremists becoming one yourself? Having grown up in a liberal democracy, being educated in the ideals of freedom of speech and expression, diversity, multi-culturalism and the political correctness that stems from such a comprehensive education, I find myself questioning whether I am a closet fascist when it comes to the way in which the British Judiciary are referring to the whole issue surrounding the London suicide bombers of 7 July and the related legal news stories stemming from this.
I cannot understand the logic of the British Judiciary in countering the British Government's call for the expulsion of a number of foreign nationals specifically identified as contributing to anti-British feeling amongst the Muslim community. For example, one of the people due for expulsion is Abu Qatada, a Jordanian who has been tried and convicted in his absence in Jordanian courts for terrorism and given a life sentence. He is known as Osama bin Laden's 'Ambassador in Europe'. Now he is concerned that if he is returned to Jordan he will face the death sentence. The question becomes one of whether we can expel someone from Britain to what may be their death? While we don't know the details of his Jordanian convictions, terrorism in the Middle East tends to be pretty deadly, so it is fair to suspect this person has been convicted of something relating to people being killed.
This is where liberal ideals and common-sense conflict ? while we may agree in Human Rights Law, is it so wrong if we don't care that this man is being sent back to what might be his death? When someone commits themselves to terrorism, do they give up their right to justice when they so blatantly abuse it? How can we allow someone to rely on Human Rights law when they have so obviously overlooked the human rights of everyone else in the country? On a more local level, why do we have someone at liberty in Britain who has been convicted of terrorism in another country? Why were they being granted freedom of speech, and freedom to gather audiences, when it was known that they had fundamentalist tendencies and links with terrorist organisations? Is it our policy in Britain to say 'welcome to Britain and feel free to hate our society and way of life?'
It would be wrong to withdraw many of our fundamental human rights such as freedom of speech because we are scared of what people might say ? but surely when there is evidence that people have gone beyond what are acceptable societal boundaries then they need to be restrained in one way or another. Is this not what the new anti-terrorism provisions are seeking to do? Finding a way of tackling fundamentalism without resorting to fascism is going to require some common-sense in terms of interpreting the law.
Nobody wants to see a repeat of the shooting of the innocent Brazilian on the underground system, but neither do people want to encounter suicide bombers. For years there have been critical news reports on Isreali soldiers shooting Palestinians who they believed to be suicide bombers, many of whom may have been innocent, as well as reports of suicide bombers blowing themselves up in buses and bars ? now the reality of this is hitting Britain. There is no way to stop a suicide bomber but to kill them before they detonate themselves. Equally, there is no way of being absolutely sure that somebody is a suicide bomber until they actually detonate themselves. There lies the Catch 22 which will dominate the British legal system for years to come. Here we believe that someone is innocent until proven guilty, but by the time a suicide bomber is proven guilty it is too late.
So where does this leave us? If we can identify the underlying factions that are stirring up fundamentalist ideals, is it not common-sense that we either imprison or deport them? Even the Muslim Council of Great Britain supports such moves. However, we need to make sure that the extremists don't win by lulling us into a fascist state out of fear, and hence we become what they are propagating we already are. It will be common-sense that wins, not fascism, but it needs to be applied through the judicial system, not just in Government.
Eddie Blass is a freelance academic and ghostwriter specialising in business & management, futures, legal, and educational issues.
affordable house cleaning Wilmette ..The NSA failed the American people and allowed the attack... Read More
Our Hydro-electricity accounts for some 20% of our current needs.... Read More
Political strategists, branding gurus and image consultants could learn a... Read More
US Steel prices have cost franchisees in my company and... Read More
Why are intelligent people so afraid of the idea that... Read More
Today we wish to examine a fallacy, or error in... Read More
As baby boomers, we have been spoiled all of our... Read More
(Note: This article was written slightly before the 2004 election;... Read More
As you can see from some of our previous articles,... Read More
There are many issues on the minds of US voters... Read More
Conventional warfare is getting to its limits. Soon wars will... Read More
Former Governor of Alaska, Jay Hammond, died at age 83,... Read More
If recent speeches by US officials on Iran's plans to... Read More
Prison guards and corrections professionals are hard at work insuring... Read More
This is the third in a short series of four... Read More
Amnesty International comments on the proposal that has been laid... Read More
The United States is losing its industrial capacity quite rapidly.... Read More
THE ROSICRUCIAN COUNCIL OF THREE:A Thelema/OTO leader who became a... Read More
Indian and Pakistan and nuclear war. What does the world... Read More
This brings to our consciousness, issues concerning the ever rising... Read More
So you are ready to run for public office are... Read More
THE ECCLESIASTICAL GRANT:There are good things done by the hegemony.... Read More
Just as everyone has breathed a sigh of relief at... Read More
The man on the tape raised his hand, pointing a... Read More
1) IS HAVING A DEMOCRACY MORE EFFECTIVE IN ADDRESSING POLITICAL... Read More
quick home cleaning Northbrook ..From the comfort of their plush offices and five to... Read More
Perhaps a silent revolution is taking place, this time more... Read More
The RSS is getting feedback from its 140 pracharaks or... Read More
For years I have been amazed as I've listened to... Read More
One way to increase evaporation in the ocean might be... Read More
When organising a country or a group of people in... Read More
Maybe some of the people complaining ought to go to... Read More
Are the junior attorneys in the Attorney General's office leaving... Read More
Recently I got to talking with a gentleman at a... Read More
Those who are above the law or act as such... Read More
Recently a friend insisted that I read a book by... Read More
We are told by out leadership that we risk loss... Read More
Throughout all recorded history on our lovely little planet, Earth's... Read More
In typical bureaucratese, the pensive EBRD analyst ventures with the... Read More
"Fahrenheit 9/11" auteur Michael Moore recently fueled the epidemic of... Read More
In what the Americans love to describe as the war... Read More
Those of us hundreds of miles from ground zero sat... Read More
There is something egregiously wrong about a government that will... Read More
Michael Moore asserts the following in his political film Fahrenheit... Read More
With the recent shakeups in the presidential cabinet, it has... Read More
It is time for a change. A change in philosophy,... Read More
One of my favourite pieces of music is the Sex... Read More
Indian and Pakistan and nuclear war. What does the world... Read More
ACCREDITATION: - Scholastic regimentation from the post WWII period has... Read More
I hear it all the time; you can't say that.... Read More
Political |