Is the only way to fight Fundamentalist Extremists becoming one yourself? Having grown up in a liberal democracy, being educated in the ideals of freedom of speech and expression, diversity, multi-culturalism and the political correctness that stems from such a comprehensive education, I find myself questioning whether I am a closet fascist when it comes to the way in which the British Judiciary are referring to the whole issue surrounding the London suicide bombers of 7 July and the related legal news stories stemming from this.
I cannot understand the logic of the British Judiciary in countering the British Government's call for the expulsion of a number of foreign nationals specifically identified as contributing to anti-British feeling amongst the Muslim community. For example, one of the people due for expulsion is Abu Qatada, a Jordanian who has been tried and convicted in his absence in Jordanian courts for terrorism and given a life sentence. He is known as Osama bin Laden's 'Ambassador in Europe'. Now he is concerned that if he is returned to Jordan he will face the death sentence. The question becomes one of whether we can expel someone from Britain to what may be their death? While we don't know the details of his Jordanian convictions, terrorism in the Middle East tends to be pretty deadly, so it is fair to suspect this person has been convicted of something relating to people being killed.
This is where liberal ideals and common-sense conflict ? while we may agree in Human Rights Law, is it so wrong if we don't care that this man is being sent back to what might be his death? When someone commits themselves to terrorism, do they give up their right to justice when they so blatantly abuse it? How can we allow someone to rely on Human Rights law when they have so obviously overlooked the human rights of everyone else in the country? On a more local level, why do we have someone at liberty in Britain who has been convicted of terrorism in another country? Why were they being granted freedom of speech, and freedom to gather audiences, when it was known that they had fundamentalist tendencies and links with terrorist organisations? Is it our policy in Britain to say 'welcome to Britain and feel free to hate our society and way of life?'
It would be wrong to withdraw many of our fundamental human rights such as freedom of speech because we are scared of what people might say ? but surely when there is evidence that people have gone beyond what are acceptable societal boundaries then they need to be restrained in one way or another. Is this not what the new anti-terrorism provisions are seeking to do? Finding a way of tackling fundamentalism without resorting to fascism is going to require some common-sense in terms of interpreting the law.
Nobody wants to see a repeat of the shooting of the innocent Brazilian on the underground system, but neither do people want to encounter suicide bombers. For years there have been critical news reports on Isreali soldiers shooting Palestinians who they believed to be suicide bombers, many of whom may have been innocent, as well as reports of suicide bombers blowing themselves up in buses and bars ? now the reality of this is hitting Britain. There is no way to stop a suicide bomber but to kill them before they detonate themselves. Equally, there is no way of being absolutely sure that somebody is a suicide bomber until they actually detonate themselves. There lies the Catch 22 which will dominate the British legal system for years to come. Here we believe that someone is innocent until proven guilty, but by the time a suicide bomber is proven guilty it is too late.
So where does this leave us? If we can identify the underlying factions that are stirring up fundamentalist ideals, is it not common-sense that we either imprison or deport them? Even the Muslim Council of Great Britain supports such moves. However, we need to make sure that the extremists don't win by lulling us into a fascist state out of fear, and hence we become what they are propagating we already are. It will be common-sense that wins, not fascism, but it needs to be applied through the judicial system, not just in Government.
Eddie Blass is a freelance academic and ghostwriter specialising in business & management, futures, legal, and educational issues.
recurring maid service Wilmette ..In this day and age of tattletale, whistleblower heroes and... Read More
In these times when states are suffering extreme downward pressure... Read More
With respect to the States' databases, you may not locate... Read More
Some call it the "unofficial" or "informal" economy, others call... Read More
Recently I met a man in a coffee shop, a... Read More
In discussing the OODA Loop theory on Limited War by... Read More
Most modern day media stories containing fear, controversy and chaos... Read More
The notion that local governments should have almost total monopoly... Read More
I. OVERVIEWIn the wake of the September 11 terrorist attacks... Read More
There is debate about the methodology of forestry and also... Read More
Dust from Deserts and Particulate ControlThe greatest contributor to particulate... Read More
A few hours ago, Colonel Ely Ould Mohamed Vall, the... Read More
Why are we over regulating the franchising industry? What are... Read More
Commission for Africa (CFA), one is made to understand is... Read More
Recently a friend insisted that I read a book by... Read More
With the recent threats from Bin Laden and Al Queda... Read More
It appears the Feds are suing Elliot Spitzer over his... Read More
Which companies are most affected by fuel? Who really bears... Read More
The filibuster has been a tool available to U.S. Senators... Read More
Washington DC council member David Catania actually suggested that the... Read More
Well many have complained that the FBI and CIA dropped... Read More
Revitalization Downtown projects are all the rage in fact the... Read More
With the recent shakeups in the presidential cabinet, it has... Read More
The Justice Department is at it again; promoting themselves in... Read More
A. THE PHILOSOPHY OF COMPETITIONThe aims of competition (anti-trust) laws... Read More
last minute cleaning help Highland Park ..When you look at the news, immigrants are dying trying... Read More
President Bush's selection of the Hon. John Roberts is an... Read More
The most exciting event in Slovenia last week was when... Read More
[Author's Note: Another essay that I wrote on notebook paper... Read More
You, the reader, should be aware of my affluence of... Read More
You know now that North Korea is backing down on... Read More
I'm starting to feel squeezed by all the political correctness... Read More
Kudos goes out to the George Walker Bush's Administration and... Read More
Thought of the day; Questions about the judicial system. If... Read More
Long Term Environmental Effect of Plastics, Composites and Other Materials... Read More
Non-lethal Goo Concepts have been tossed around by many war... Read More
Possible UAV materials are infinite: Foam, Composite, Balsa Wood, Plastic,... Read More
Down The Bush and BlairBy now everyone, except us, is... Read More
We see today a fierce unspoken competition between trucks and... Read More
"The Jesuit priest John H. Surratt, proven to be the... Read More
I. WARS ARE BASIC CONFLICTS OVER LAND. II. BOUNDARIES. THE... Read More
The other day I was sucker punched, hoodwinked, bamboozled, had... Read More
"Had there not been outsourcing and utilization of cheaper resources... Read More
All to often law makers and regulators create rules and... Read More
The end of another election once again brings into focus... Read More
What depth of blind insanity has inflicted itself upon Israel's... Read More
The man on the tape raised his hand, pointing a... Read More
The predominant discussion in the Indianapolis media over the proposed... Read More
Currently the US Army is having trouble recruiting. These problems... Read More
Einstein when ask how did he believe WWIII would be... Read More
Political |