Is the only way to fight Fundamentalist Extremists becoming one yourself? Having grown up in a liberal democracy, being educated in the ideals of freedom of speech and expression, diversity, multi-culturalism and the political correctness that stems from such a comprehensive education, I find myself questioning whether I am a closet fascist when it comes to the way in which the British Judiciary are referring to the whole issue surrounding the London suicide bombers of 7 July and the related legal news stories stemming from this.
I cannot understand the logic of the British Judiciary in countering the British Government's call for the expulsion of a number of foreign nationals specifically identified as contributing to anti-British feeling amongst the Muslim community. For example, one of the people due for expulsion is Abu Qatada, a Jordanian who has been tried and convicted in his absence in Jordanian courts for terrorism and given a life sentence. He is known as Osama bin Laden's 'Ambassador in Europe'. Now he is concerned that if he is returned to Jordan he will face the death sentence. The question becomes one of whether we can expel someone from Britain to what may be their death? While we don't know the details of his Jordanian convictions, terrorism in the Middle East tends to be pretty deadly, so it is fair to suspect this person has been convicted of something relating to people being killed.
This is where liberal ideals and common-sense conflict ? while we may agree in Human Rights Law, is it so wrong if we don't care that this man is being sent back to what might be his death? When someone commits themselves to terrorism, do they give up their right to justice when they so blatantly abuse it? How can we allow someone to rely on Human Rights law when they have so obviously overlooked the human rights of everyone else in the country? On a more local level, why do we have someone at liberty in Britain who has been convicted of terrorism in another country? Why were they being granted freedom of speech, and freedom to gather audiences, when it was known that they had fundamentalist tendencies and links with terrorist organisations? Is it our policy in Britain to say 'welcome to Britain and feel free to hate our society and way of life?'
It would be wrong to withdraw many of our fundamental human rights such as freedom of speech because we are scared of what people might say ? but surely when there is evidence that people have gone beyond what are acceptable societal boundaries then they need to be restrained in one way or another. Is this not what the new anti-terrorism provisions are seeking to do? Finding a way of tackling fundamentalism without resorting to fascism is going to require some common-sense in terms of interpreting the law.
Nobody wants to see a repeat of the shooting of the innocent Brazilian on the underground system, but neither do people want to encounter suicide bombers. For years there have been critical news reports on Isreali soldiers shooting Palestinians who they believed to be suicide bombers, many of whom may have been innocent, as well as reports of suicide bombers blowing themselves up in buses and bars ? now the reality of this is hitting Britain. There is no way to stop a suicide bomber but to kill them before they detonate themselves. Equally, there is no way of being absolutely sure that somebody is a suicide bomber until they actually detonate themselves. There lies the Catch 22 which will dominate the British legal system for years to come. Here we believe that someone is innocent until proven guilty, but by the time a suicide bomber is proven guilty it is too late.
So where does this leave us? If we can identify the underlying factions that are stirring up fundamentalist ideals, is it not common-sense that we either imprison or deport them? Even the Muslim Council of Great Britain supports such moves. However, we need to make sure that the extremists don't win by lulling us into a fascist state out of fear, and hence we become what they are propagating we already are. It will be common-sense that wins, not fascism, but it needs to be applied through the judicial system, not just in Government.
Eddie Blass is a freelance academic and ghostwriter specialising in business & management, futures, legal, and educational issues.
recurring cleaning service Mundelein ..When we go through periods of droughts we also have... Read More
Leave it to the Columbia City Police Officers Association in... Read More
News is spreading of the retirement of Supreme Court Justice... Read More
You know we have sent many, many army tanks with... Read More
With the recent shakeups in the presidential cabinet, it has... Read More
Political strategists, branding gurus and image consultants could learn a... Read More
Where are all the high-speed trains we were promised? Where... Read More
For a short time I worked as a union officer... Read More
You have in front of you two buttons, one is... Read More
As we increase our populations every new soul will require... Read More
It can be dangerous to engage in free speech. This... Read More
The most exciting event in Slovenia last week was when... Read More
The Republican Party became popular due to its view on... Read More
"Those who sacrifice essential liberty for temporary safety are not... Read More
As I read the papers and watch the news day... Read More
Entrepreneurs can clean up the environment if we would let... Read More
1) IS HAVING A DEMOCRACY MORE EFFECTIVE IN ADDRESSING POLITICAL... Read More
We are told by out leadership that we risk loss... Read More
In typical bureaucratese, the pensive EBRD analyst ventures with the... Read More
The civil war in Iraq seems to be much more... Read More
All countries have specific things that are abundant in the... Read More
Proposed changes to the Sex Discrimination Act ("SDA") 1975 and... Read More
Many people who are expert in the issue of the... Read More
Sizing up North Korea is important for a war there.... Read More
"When you are right you cannot be too radical; when... Read More
tidy up service Buffalo Grove ..We are seeing some trade wars brewing as American trade... Read More
We recently saw another ferry accident, this one in NY... Read More
Sizing up North Korea is important for a war there.... Read More
Why did FDR say Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and Count... Read More
The great people of the United States of America deserve... Read More
There is something egregiously wrong about a government that will... Read More
You are not going to believe what is going on... Read More
As concerns grow over the threat of bioterrorism and weapons... Read More
Presently Universities and Private Enterprise are working to build more... Read More
Capitalism as the social structure was founded in order to... Read More
A friend of mine, who lives in the thick of... Read More
Many are condemning the latest GM Terminator seeds. Yet there... Read More
Three years ago I published a book of short stories... Read More
The European Court of Justice ("ECJ") ruled in Praktiker Bau-... Read More
After the dance the piper must be paid. To help... Read More
If slavery has not worked well, then cloning if it... Read More
Down The Bush and BlairBy now everyone, except us, is... Read More
Many non-profit groups are feeling upset that they are allowed... Read More
Every conflict has its economic moments and dimensions. The current... Read More
In his bid for the presidency, John Kerry pronounced a... Read More
MUD ? Much Unnecessary DisclosureThe Federal Trade Commission recently asserted... Read More
There are many types of fuels besides that gasoline we... Read More
According to a postulate made by Ignacio Ramonet ecological resources... Read More
THE ROSICRUCIAN COUNCIL OF THREE:A Thelema/OTO leader who became a... Read More
Originally published in 1958, "The Ugly American" (Lederer & Burdick)... Read More
Political |