Clint Eastwood recently plunged into the murky political pond with his statement, "Extremism is so easy. You've got your position, and that's it. It doesn't take much thought. And when you go far enough to the right, you meet the same idiots coming around from the left."
Is it easy to be an extremist, and is the political scale truly circular, so that the "far right" clasps hands with the "far left"? Does the left-right continuum serve as a constructive paradigm upon which society can be structured?
Today's "extremists" are in good company: Jesus, Martin Luther, Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson, and Baruch Spinoza all bore this label at one time. Jan De Witt and his brother Cornelius-17th Century Dutch politicians-were hacked to death by the populace, largely due to their "radical" and "unsavory" political perspective. Their crime? They were proponents of democracy. Their body parts were displayed in storefronts all over town.
Who shall we call extreme? The vigilantes who did the lynching? The shopkeepers who showcased the body parts? Or the De Witts with their pro-democracy stance?
Do "extreme" beliefs emanate from a mechanical thought process, as Eastwood suggests, rather than an intense philosophical journey? It arguably requires reflection and hypercritical analysis to defend ones theories against the cloned, echoed and mass produced opinion of the common folk; it requires conviction to risk social ostracism and other forms of retaliation.
The "approved" or popular view is more likely to be perfunctory. Why think when one can plagiarize? Why go out on a limb when one can cling onto the tree or never climb in the first place?
Eastwood may view those on the "far right" and "far left" as moralistically shrill, as manifesting a tone level of fear and anger. Perhaps this is how the "right" and "left" overlap or come full circle in his mind. But this is a gross generalization, since the "extremes" are subjective and the political continuum fallacious.
Suppose we accept the commonly accepted paradigm of a left to right political continuum, as Eastwood offers. If we define the "left" as the group that protects the voiceless, the powerless, and the forgotten, then the natural progression would be to protect the truly voiceless ? animals and nature.
Nonhumans are excluded from our political system, without representation. They have no standing in court; yet corporations do. In fact, nonhumans are virtually omitted from the conversation in our anthropocentric and speciesist society.
A move "left" arguably means to move away from Democracy-?which is really just a rule by the elite (humans)-?to an Omniocracy (which I describe as a government of, by and for all living beings). The European Union has added nonhumans to their Constitution, as have Switzerland and Germany. New Zealand, India and Reggio Emilio, Italy have outlawed using animals in ways we normally think acceptable in the U.S. (boiling lobsters alive, keeping fish in small bowls, vivisection, etc.).
We are trailing behind other nations, but it would be difficult to sell a Constitutional amendment to our "What's the Matter With Kansas?" country at this time. It would be easier to convince certain states. You may be thinking what would stuffing a few extra words in a state Constitution really do. Well, words are a powerful tool and an important start.
Lastly, does this move to the left spit us out on right? Probably. One could argue that traditional "right" politics prompts a gap between the rich and poor, thus culminates in the rule by a few, such as corporations. To implement policies that foster the idea that nonhuman species have value "in and of themselves," a "top down" government or rule by a few (although not corporations) again seems required.
People are self-interested (as are all species) thus cannot be expected to vote against their desires. Legislators, however, are different (or should be) because they attain self-worth from helping others, being fair and inclusive, and consulting the "big picture." There will naturally be conflicts of interest between species and individuals; but government's job-in an omniocracy as in our current system-- will be to mediate and arbitrate these "disputes."
We are taught democracy is the most inclusive, just and beneficent political system in the world. It is time to re-evaluate. Successful ideas advance through three stages: first ridicule, then discussion, finally adoption. I say we begin the discussion to which Eastwood's words have provided a starting point.
The Clint Eastwood quote is posted on oakland mayor jerry brown's blog and is taken from Feb 28, 2005 issue of Time Magazine. Charlotte Laws explores this topic in greater depth on the blog.
Charlotte Laws, Ph.D. is a member of the Greater Valley Glen Council and the President of the League for Earth and Animal Protection (LEAP). Her website is oakland mayor jerry brown's blog
house refresh service Morton Grove ..Recently scientists have been watching the exponential growth of marine... Read More
While many Pennsylvanians are struggling to figure out how they... Read More
Britain has a proud tradition of valiant armed forces and... Read More
UK Water RatesYOU CANNOT BE DISCONNECTED FOR WATER RATES DEBTSWater... Read More
It looks overall like the liberals are advocating for no... Read More
After 9-11 insurance rates on Independent Truck Drivers and smaller... Read More
Veterans Affairs Employees using government credit cards on personal items?... Read More
In the event of that a threatening nation to the... Read More
Compulsory-attendance laws force parents to send their children to public... Read More
Fearful that terrorists will next target Australia, Prime Minister John... Read More
Ever wonder why labor unions consistently endorse democrats over republicans... Read More
Quit paying the DEA to chase marijuana. We could save... Read More
An article in Information Week in January 14, 2002 discussed... Read More
Proposed changes to the Sex Discrimination Act ("SDA") 1975 and... Read More
OH MAN!Here we go again. I guess now the "proof... Read More
Many in the peanut gallery of society are so quick... Read More
The clause (c) of Electronic Crime Act 2004 has been... Read More
Predicting the future is a tricky business. There have been... Read More
For many years now, I have been the proud holder... Read More
Excess capacity occurs in many industries, such as power, electricity,... Read More
Rule of Thumb for exporting technology. The American People need... Read More
(Note: This article was written slightly before the 2004 election;... Read More
Heaven, Hell, or some sort of Purgatory.I cannot seem to... Read More
When North Americans discuss Cuba, they always focus the intense... Read More
If we go hog wild towards the liberal agenda where... Read More
cleaning service near Mundelein ..Many people who are expert in the issue of the... Read More
Last week, I began my look ahead to the 2008... Read More
America is filled with standouts and perserverance; our nation has... Read More
This, of course, is a political decision. There is no... Read More
We know that in Maryland, which some call "Merry Land"... Read More
The official working week is being reduced to 35 hours... Read More
For years I have been amazed as I've listened to... Read More
In typical bureaucratese, the pensive EBRD analyst ventures with the... Read More
From the comfort of their plush offices and five to... Read More
You know we have sent many, many army tanks with... Read More
We are destroying our freedoms and slowing innovation, due to... Read More
In discussing the OODA Loop theory on Limited War by... Read More
Conor MacDari was a Mason but his Masonry deplored the... Read More
Introduction:Although politicians and so-called "Intelligence Experts" are the ones appearing... Read More
The great leader and Senator from New York and wife... Read More
Death may not be dignified in any light but the... Read More
Rufus King: (Said to be the fifth most important person... Read More
Why President Bush should have his second term? The arguments... Read More
The number-one question people ask us is, "What possessed you... Read More
The Randolphs:Peyton Randolph was the first President of the United... Read More
Here are some miscellaneous thoughts on issues many of which... Read More
With respect to the States' databases, you may not locate... Read More
"The only time I open my mouth is when I... Read More
Any chances for a country to be ruled by alternative... Read More
I watch the TV news and I get angry. I... Read More
Political |