Clint Eastwood recently plunged into the murky political pond with his statement, "Extremism is so easy. You've got your position, and that's it. It doesn't take much thought. And when you go far enough to the right, you meet the same idiots coming around from the left."
Is it easy to be an extremist, and is the political scale truly circular, so that the "far right" clasps hands with the "far left"? Does the left-right continuum serve as a constructive paradigm upon which society can be structured?
Today's "extremists" are in good company: Jesus, Martin Luther, Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson, and Baruch Spinoza all bore this label at one time. Jan De Witt and his brother Cornelius-17th Century Dutch politicians-were hacked to death by the populace, largely due to their "radical" and "unsavory" political perspective. Their crime? They were proponents of democracy. Their body parts were displayed in storefronts all over town.
Who shall we call extreme? The vigilantes who did the lynching? The shopkeepers who showcased the body parts? Or the De Witts with their pro-democracy stance?
Do "extreme" beliefs emanate from a mechanical thought process, as Eastwood suggests, rather than an intense philosophical journey? It arguably requires reflection and hypercritical analysis to defend ones theories against the cloned, echoed and mass produced opinion of the common folk; it requires conviction to risk social ostracism and other forms of retaliation.
The "approved" or popular view is more likely to be perfunctory. Why think when one can plagiarize? Why go out on a limb when one can cling onto the tree or never climb in the first place?
Eastwood may view those on the "far right" and "far left" as moralistically shrill, as manifesting a tone level of fear and anger. Perhaps this is how the "right" and "left" overlap or come full circle in his mind. But this is a gross generalization, since the "extremes" are subjective and the political continuum fallacious.
Suppose we accept the commonly accepted paradigm of a left to right political continuum, as Eastwood offers. If we define the "left" as the group that protects the voiceless, the powerless, and the forgotten, then the natural progression would be to protect the truly voiceless ? animals and nature.
Nonhumans are excluded from our political system, without representation. They have no standing in court; yet corporations do. In fact, nonhumans are virtually omitted from the conversation in our anthropocentric and speciesist society.
A move "left" arguably means to move away from Democracy-?which is really just a rule by the elite (humans)-?to an Omniocracy (which I describe as a government of, by and for all living beings). The European Union has added nonhumans to their Constitution, as have Switzerland and Germany. New Zealand, India and Reggio Emilio, Italy have outlawed using animals in ways we normally think acceptable in the U.S. (boiling lobsters alive, keeping fish in small bowls, vivisection, etc.).
We are trailing behind other nations, but it would be difficult to sell a Constitutional amendment to our "What's the Matter With Kansas?" country at this time. It would be easier to convince certain states. You may be thinking what would stuffing a few extra words in a state Constitution really do. Well, words are a powerful tool and an important start.
Lastly, does this move to the left spit us out on right? Probably. One could argue that traditional "right" politics prompts a gap between the rich and poor, thus culminates in the rule by a few, such as corporations. To implement policies that foster the idea that nonhuman species have value "in and of themselves," a "top down" government or rule by a few (although not corporations) again seems required.
People are self-interested (as are all species) thus cannot be expected to vote against their desires. Legislators, however, are different (or should be) because they attain self-worth from helping others, being fair and inclusive, and consulting the "big picture." There will naturally be conflicts of interest between species and individuals; but government's job-in an omniocracy as in our current system-- will be to mediate and arbitrate these "disputes."
We are taught democracy is the most inclusive, just and beneficent political system in the world. It is time to re-evaluate. Successful ideas advance through three stages: first ridicule, then discussion, finally adoption. I say we begin the discussion to which Eastwood's words have provided a starting point.
The Clint Eastwood quote is posted on oakland mayor jerry brown's blog and is taken from Feb 28, 2005 issue of Time Magazine. Charlotte Laws explores this topic in greater depth on the blog.
Charlotte Laws, Ph.D. is a member of the Greater Valley Glen Council and the President of the League for Earth and Animal Protection (LEAP). Her website is oakland mayor jerry brown's blog
maide service in Lincolnshire ..As we reel from the news of the recent bombings... Read More
Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, has... Read More
Kudos goes out to the George Walker Bush's Administration and... Read More
There are many types of fuels besides that gasoline we... Read More
Down The Bush and BlairBy now everyone, except us, is... Read More
In the last two weeks, two non-senior US officials indirectly... Read More
When we go through periods of droughts we also have... Read More
Where are all the high-speed trains we were promised? Where... Read More
Our trade deficit is directly proportional to our attacks on... Read More
There is something egregiously wrong about a government that will... Read More
I am personally calling for a total disbanding of the... Read More
A governing.com report blast one of the major grassroots initiatives... Read More
The Federal trade Commission has a rule, which says that... Read More
De-classification of official documents have been a routine practice in... Read More
Tulipmania - this is the name coined for the first... Read More
If we go hog wild towards the liberal agenda where... Read More
After 9-11 insurance rates on Independent Truck Drivers and smaller... Read More
An interesting conversation that I thought I must share with... Read More
September 11, 2001 could have been prevented. We could have... Read More
Corporate America has been shaken recently by lawsuits and criminal... Read More
I. WARS ARE BASIC CONFLICTS OVER LAND. II. BOUNDARIES. THE... Read More
What depth of blind insanity has inflicted itself upon Israel's... Read More
I am an incurably ill American male forced to leave... Read More
Wealth Distribution is often discussed at length in periodicals such... Read More
The organic farmers are angry that Monsantos terminator GM seeds... Read More
cleaning lady near Deerfield ..An irresponsible Chinese General made a very telling comment recently.... Read More
All countries have specific things that are abundant in the... Read More
After the dance the piper must be paid. To help... Read More
Why are intelligent people so afraid of the idea that... Read More
Water Conservation in larger cities is less of an issue... Read More
30 years ago, California, later followed by other states, decided... Read More
Q. Should the Government be concerned if the CPI rises... Read More
Regarding the de-regulation of energy, this is not such a... Read More
We know we can cloak a giant airship from those... Read More
"The Jesuit priest John H. Surratt, proven to be the... Read More
Everyone knows the United States Government often falls down in... Read More
Hitler received a legacy from his Rothschild relations in Vienna... Read More
Without the flow of fuel our very mobile society comes... Read More
This is a thought on the study of Home and... Read More
The problem of poverty in America comes as a surprise.... Read More
Every conflict has its economic moments and dimensions. The current... Read More
Streamlining Homeland Security with a Free market flair? An idea... Read More
America has some monetary issues, which need to be addressed.... Read More
Some call it the "unofficial" or "informal" economy, others call... Read More
President George W. Bush has unofficially won his re-election bid... Read More
The end of another election once again brings into focus... Read More
The recent Jakarta summit of Asia and Africa brought remembrance... Read More
Ok, here is what happened: On March 31, 2005, Pat... Read More
As pictures and videos surface showing young American soldiers humiliating... Read More
The furore in the BJP camp in India, triggered by... Read More
Political |