There are no stupid questions, only stupid people. Ask an economist for proof of one of their pet theories and you'll find quickly that the age old axiom that we all learned in school and work place training seminars is dead wrong. You can ask a stupid question if you're talking to an economist and that question can, in fact, make you stupid.
It's a well accepted fact that scientists are not the greatest communicators around. They generally are not strong in the customer service or public relations fields. Scientists spend their time preaching to the well educated, well informed, scientific choir. When the time comes that a scientific discovery leads to a consumer product, it is not scientists that explain the benefits and dangers of the new product, a marketing company will handle that. Because of the disconnect between the science behind a product and the actual implementation of that science, there are a slew of products which are around 1.25% scientific fact and 98.75% marketing hype (take a look at your average diet pill). Consumers don't know the difference because scientists won't talk to us.
Economists also fancy themselves as scientists. They like to say that they have laws and they also don't feel the need to deign to speak to the general public about their work. They talk to each other, develop their theories, push for the implementation of those theories and generally think that Liberal Arts majors and auto mechanics should mind their own business. Maybe it's time that we lowly non-economists demand a few answers.
It's tremendously irksome to hear an economist speak about an economic law. Ask the economist to demonstrate the law and he will fall quickly to an explanation of the theories which, in his opinion, make the law true. Supply and Demand can only be verified by reading those theorists who endorse the idea. The theory cannot be measured, cannot be duplicated under scientific standards, cannot be certain to have the same outcome at all times, even given the same circumstances. It is therefore not a law. It's just a widely accepted theory.
I've got no problem with widely accepted theories. What I do find disturbing and even dangerous is the application of widely accepted theories into public policy without regard to whom is being hurt and without question as to whether or not the theory is working.
Take free trade for instance. It's an economic policy which is not demanded by the average working person, but which both major political parties endorse to some extent and which the Libertarian Party makes a cornerstone of it's platform. The theories all indicate that some job loss, even great displacement of a given society's workers, is to be expected. In fact, the displacement is a good thing, since it allows once unskilled laborers to study and become highly skilled technitions, or accountants or something. Unfortunately, the American people aren't privy to this part of the working economic theory and thusly aren't excited to hear that the reason that their job was offshore is due to India's comparative advantage in call center operations. The displaced worker may not feel that they are a worthy subject for the grand experiment of free trade.
Of course, no theory says that America has to be the winner in the free trade free-for-all rush to the top of the comparative/absolute advantage heap. No, economists don't often talk about nations at all. Their theories do not aim to find ways of make America the most economically powerful nation, or the richest, or the most comfortable; their theories work to ensure a true free market. The problem with a truly free market is that the displaced workers can just as easily be upper middle class Americans and the new skills that they may be acquiring just may be menial labor. Ask an economist why the displaced workers are always poor and always must be and I'll bet you money that they cannot give even a small piece of evidence to show a reason why that is so.
Yet our politicians, being taught economics in universities which are almost universally in support of free trade, themselves support free trade. They support an economic theory that has no evidence of actually being affective, but which may cause damage to the American economy, a fact which any honest free trade supporting economist would have to admit doesn't matter to them. Yet, the average person is not supposed to question these theories and certainly not the logic of the theorocrats that endorse them. If you fail to remain quietly on the sidelines of history and make the mistake of questioning the theory behind free trade, then you will be the recipient of a litany of the names of long dead authors who will all prove you wrong. You'll be called an idiot (trust me, I've had these discussions), they will threaten your mother's virtue before they admit that they can provide no evidence that they are correct.
Does a lack of evidence prove that the economists are wrong? Not at all. In fact, my desire for evidence is proof that I don't know enough about economics to ask more informed questions than, "can you prove that?" I do think, though, that is a damn fine place to start. Maybe more economists should start their path of theoretical enlightenment by questioning the fundamental truth of what they are being taught. Maybe economists should consider being the first scientists to learn customer service. If that seems like a bit of a demotion, just call it retraining for new economic conditions.
About The Author
Donald R. Carroll III is a student, insurance adjuster and freelance writer from Kansas City, Missouri.
Batchtown Chicago prom limo .. Lockport Chicago limo O’HareProsecutors with political ambitions are known to modify the truth... Read More
Fifteen hours is a tremendous barrier. It is the obstacle... Read More
After the dance the piper must be paid. To help... Read More
Do you ever wonder how everything gets to the super... Read More
With gasoline prices at the pump climbing strongly into the... Read More
Many MLM sales people mean well but they inadvertently commit... Read More
Many times our government regulatory over embellish problems in the... Read More
Journalism, as it is often said, is the 'fourth branch... Read More
The trade deficit with Canada is now 50 Billion per... Read More
Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, has... Read More
Former Senator, Daniel Moynihan, accurately summed up the situation when... Read More
I read an interesting article in foreign Affairs magazine last... Read More
The second amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees every American... Read More
The end of another election once again brings into focus... Read More
Amnesty International comments on the proposal that has been laid... Read More
Unions are angry at the high salary of the executives... Read More
The FBI recently before Congress stated that Eco-Terrorism was on... Read More
ACCREDITATION: - Scholastic regimentation from the post WWII period has... Read More
Many have lost faith in the government and are completely... Read More
President Bush and Secretary Powell should hang their heads in... Read More
I would like to discuss a few issues we have... Read More
Dust from Deserts and Particulate ControlThe greatest contributor to particulate... Read More
The cause of America is in a great measure the... Read More
The recent Jakarta summit of Asia and Africa brought remembrance... Read More
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Was created on July 30th 2002, by... Read More
shuttle from Midway Munster are ..Most modern day media stories containing fear, controversy and chaos... Read More
We have read about the unemployment rate being high. Really... Read More
The current field of political sciences is dominated by a... Read More
A visitor to Moscow would be immediately struck by the... Read More
Quit paying the DEA to chase marijuana. We could save... Read More
The filibuster as a political delaying tactic has been a... Read More
As I read the papers and watch the news day... Read More
All government regulators or diplomat who are in high risk... Read More
Heaven, Hell, or some sort of Purgatory.I cannot seem to... Read More
When this president's father was in the Oval Office, he... Read More
Prison guards and corrections professionals are hard at work insuring... Read More
Bill Cosby got it wrong. His many speeches regarding the... Read More
The American Dream is the promise to have it all... Read More
Washington DC council member David Catania actually suggested that the... Read More
Tulipmania - this is the name coined for the first... Read More
The Flow of Trade is a major consideration of civilizations... Read More
In these times when states are suffering extreme downward pressure... Read More
The most exciting event in Slovenia last week was when... Read More
President George W. Bush has unofficially won his re-election bid... Read More
Last week, the media coverage called the airplane crash in... Read More
Many parents might think it a bit farfetched to compare... Read More
The plight of whistleblowers ? those employees who sound the... Read More
Where are all the high-speed trains we were promised? Where... Read More
30 years ago, California, later followed by other states, decided... Read More
The number of countries in the world at the moment... Read More
Political |