There are no stupid questions, only stupid people. Ask an economist for proof of one of their pet theories and you'll find quickly that the age old axiom that we all learned in school and work place training seminars is dead wrong. You can ask a stupid question if you're talking to an economist and that question can, in fact, make you stupid.
It's a well accepted fact that scientists are not the greatest communicators around. They generally are not strong in the customer service or public relations fields. Scientists spend their time preaching to the well educated, well informed, scientific choir. When the time comes that a scientific discovery leads to a consumer product, it is not scientists that explain the benefits and dangers of the new product, a marketing company will handle that. Because of the disconnect between the science behind a product and the actual implementation of that science, there are a slew of products which are around 1.25% scientific fact and 98.75% marketing hype (take a look at your average diet pill). Consumers don't know the difference because scientists won't talk to us.
Economists also fancy themselves as scientists. They like to say that they have laws and they also don't feel the need to deign to speak to the general public about their work. They talk to each other, develop their theories, push for the implementation of those theories and generally think that Liberal Arts majors and auto mechanics should mind their own business. Maybe it's time that we lowly non-economists demand a few answers.
It's tremendously irksome to hear an economist speak about an economic law. Ask the economist to demonstrate the law and he will fall quickly to an explanation of the theories which, in his opinion, make the law true. Supply and Demand can only be verified by reading those theorists who endorse the idea. The theory cannot be measured, cannot be duplicated under scientific standards, cannot be certain to have the same outcome at all times, even given the same circumstances. It is therefore not a law. It's just a widely accepted theory.
I've got no problem with widely accepted theories. What I do find disturbing and even dangerous is the application of widely accepted theories into public policy without regard to whom is being hurt and without question as to whether or not the theory is working.
Take free trade for instance. It's an economic policy which is not demanded by the average working person, but which both major political parties endorse to some extent and which the Libertarian Party makes a cornerstone of it's platform. The theories all indicate that some job loss, even great displacement of a given society's workers, is to be expected. In fact, the displacement is a good thing, since it allows once unskilled laborers to study and become highly skilled technitions, or accountants or something. Unfortunately, the American people aren't privy to this part of the working economic theory and thusly aren't excited to hear that the reason that their job was offshore is due to India's comparative advantage in call center operations. The displaced worker may not feel that they are a worthy subject for the grand experiment of free trade.
Of course, no theory says that America has to be the winner in the free trade free-for-all rush to the top of the comparative/absolute advantage heap. No, economists don't often talk about nations at all. Their theories do not aim to find ways of make America the most economically powerful nation, or the richest, or the most comfortable; their theories work to ensure a true free market. The problem with a truly free market is that the displaced workers can just as easily be upper middle class Americans and the new skills that they may be acquiring just may be menial labor. Ask an economist why the displaced workers are always poor and always must be and I'll bet you money that they cannot give even a small piece of evidence to show a reason why that is so.
Yet our politicians, being taught economics in universities which are almost universally in support of free trade, themselves support free trade. They support an economic theory that has no evidence of actually being affective, but which may cause damage to the American economy, a fact which any honest free trade supporting economist would have to admit doesn't matter to them. Yet, the average person is not supposed to question these theories and certainly not the logic of the theorocrats that endorse them. If you fail to remain quietly on the sidelines of history and make the mistake of questioning the theory behind free trade, then you will be the recipient of a litany of the names of long dead authors who will all prove you wrong. You'll be called an idiot (trust me, I've had these discussions), they will threaten your mother's virtue before they admit that they can provide no evidence that they are correct.
Does a lack of evidence prove that the economists are wrong? Not at all. In fact, my desire for evidence is proof that I don't know enough about economics to ask more informed questions than, "can you prove that?" I do think, though, that is a damn fine place to start. Maybe more economists should start their path of theoretical enlightenment by questioning the fundamental truth of what they are being taught. Maybe economists should consider being the first scientists to learn customer service. If that seems like a bit of a demotion, just call it retraining for new economic conditions.
About The Author
Donald R. Carroll III is a student, insurance adjuster and freelance writer from Kansas City, Missouri.
Wood Dale Chicago prom limo .. Lockport Chicago limo O’HareIran has threatened to raise America's fuel prices again. They... Read More
The recent Jakarta summit of Asia and Africa brought remembrance... Read More
The current political efforts aimed at improving the American public... Read More
In order to win the presidency in America, candidates must... Read More
Businesses advertising alcohol either in TV or non-broadcast format need... Read More
September 11, 2001 could have been prevented. We could have... Read More
The Republican Party became popular due to its view on... Read More
A. THE PHILOSOPHY OF COMPETITIONThe aims of competition (anti-trust) laws... Read More
Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Men desire power. Give power to... Read More
We are having a problem in America with Public Notaries,... Read More
History repeats itself, goes the cliche. It does so, perhaps,... Read More
To be justified, taxes should satisfy a few conditions:Above all,... Read More
I am personally calling for a total disbanding of the... Read More
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development issued a report... Read More
SYNOD OF DRUM CEATT (494 - 5):It is interesting to... Read More
You are not going to believe what is going on... Read More
While many Pennsylvanians are struggling to figure out how they... Read More
The current field of political sciences is dominated by a... Read More
As pictures and videos surface showing young American soldiers humiliating... Read More
We learned some lessons in these last few wars. For... Read More
You know we have sent many, many army tanks with... Read More
Submiting the Criminals to The ICC!Everybody concerns about justice in... Read More
The original vulgarity was bylined: ?The Constipation of America's Mid-East... Read More
We know we can cloak a giant airship from those... Read More
Corporate America has been shaken recently by lawsuits and criminal... Read More
Antigo wedding limo ..There are many issues on the minds of US voters... Read More
After the dance the piper must be paid. To help... Read More
Will a bus running across the borders bring cordial relations... Read More
Japan lit its candles of pure, "noble sadness" on the... Read More
In every national budget, there is a part called "Public... Read More
Many folks who are pro-NASA and Pro-Space Colonies say that... Read More
The current field of political sciences is dominated by a... Read More
Heavens, what are we up against? It seems these days... Read More
Three years ago I published a book of short stories... Read More
The prosecutors in the Martha Stewart Case used testimony from... Read More
In today's Rants from Lance session I address the question... Read More
The US Dollar has been falling continuously in last year.... Read More
President Bush's selection of the Hon. John Roberts is an... Read More
The RSS is getting feedback from its 140 pracharaks or... Read More
Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter to Lafayette in 1823 that... Read More
A few hours ago, Colonel Ely Ould Mohamed Vall, the... Read More
Fearful that terrorists will next target Australia, Prime Minister John... Read More
Hitler received a legacy from his Rothschild relations in Vienna... Read More
The new law "Special Protective, Antidumping and Import Compensatory Measures"... Read More
THE ECCLESIASTICAL GRANT:There are good things done by the hegemony.... Read More
Recently in Professional Builder a cover article discussed how the... Read More
"The only time I open my mouth is when I... Read More
The Justice Department is at it again; promoting themselves in... Read More
We recently saw another ferry accident, this one in NY... Read More
There's a new Michigan state register (at https://www.protectmichild.com/) in the... Read More
Political |