[Author's Note: Another essay that I wrote on notebook paper during boring school hours. This wonderful little piece was starting in boring English class on Tuesday, November 26, 2002, and continued into Art class. It was finished in school on Tuesday, December 2, 2002, when I finished it in English class. I worked on it in no other class, and finished it within a few classes. Hooray for high school.]
The Beginning
If a group of people were to live on an island, who would govern who, how, and why? If person A suspected person B of possessing a deadly weapon (if this were a crime), then how could we justify person A searching person B? Whatever reason offered for justification of search and seizure, it aso justifies person B searching person A. On this island, who would be the government? Who would rule? Whatever can justify the rule of person A can also justify the rule of person B. If one person is elected on the island, through some sort of Republic process, how is he justified in passing and enforcing laws? If an elected ruler passes a law that anyone to wear a hat is killed, would it not be equally justified for one dissident to make their own government, passing legislation that wearing hats is acceptable?
A government may be defined as a person or a persons trying to enforce a rule or regulation. And if one government can be formed by one person, with legislation passed that possessing head fashion is illegal, so another one is not more wrong in making it legal.
By what right would one government have the right to tell one person to do, any more than the one person would have the right to tell what the government to do? Is there anything intrinsically distinctive of either the individual or the government that allows one to control the other without restraint? If this individual opposed the state's regulation as much as the state opposed the individual's actions, how is one more justified in controlling the other? There can be no appeal to one being intrinsically right and one being intrinsically wrong: there have been just as many bad governments as there have been bad rebels. So, if a party of people lived on an island, who would govern who, and how could it possibly be justified?
Take into consideration the lack of justification for government to rule anyone on this island, as for the United States to rule anyone on this land. Just as a government on the island can oppose an individual's actions, so does our United States government oppose some of our actions, as they carry out their regulation. Use of Marijuana, a harmless practice, has been banned by the state. By what writ can the government jail Marijuana users, any more than Marijuana users can enforce their own regulation allowing Marijuana? If a police officer is justified in arresting members of society who do no harm but just commit a crime, then a citizen must be justified in arresting the government equally. There is no divine mandate given to anyone to rule, control, and kill others, be it any populace member or any government.
The similarities between the hypothetical island scenario and the United States government are undeniable. The United States government has no right to rule me any more than I have a right to rule those people who make up the government. Nor ar they justified in any of their legislation, and enforcing their legislation, whether it is outlawing murder, wearing hats, or believing what you want. The government has no right to pass such laws any more than I have the right to pass such laws.
The Middle
The Republic is a type of government where the people vote for one person to rule all. This varies from other types of governments where, more or less, a ruler maintains their power. By maintaining power, I do not mean by campaigning, but rather by an army theratening the populace. Such a ruler may be known as a dictator or a monarch. However, there are some who stipulate that a king's rule is tryanny to the rule of an elected official. What can there be, honestly, to separate the rule of a dictator and the rule of an elected official? Historically, both are prone to commit the most atrocious acts, often defending themselves with the idea that they are defending their land.
Furthermore, both presidents and kings have accepted bribery and corruption. What can there be to separate a Dictatorship and a Republic? It still gives one person, out of thousands, possibly millions, it gives this one person control over the rest of the populace. And whether or not a Constitution exists in this Monarchy or Republic, kings and presidents have both trampled them to pieces in the wake of their search for power and wealth. There is one solitary difference between a dictator and a president: one is elected, one is not. The similarities between these two, though, is endless: their cruel search for power, the history of their relentlessness in eliminating enemies, they rule a population without restrain or control, save the remnants of their conscience.
The United States' administration differs from that of a Latin Dictatorship in one way: how they are chosen. The United States goes through the process of election where we choose our president, but even this failed, as the majority voted against the president who seized power. If there is any proof of corruption of power, of how a president is nothing more than a dictator, then let it be this: our current president was voted against by the people, but he rules us anyway. His laws control our bodies, even though we did not choose him. George W. Bush is not in power because he was elected. He is in power because of his army, because of his secret, underground spy network which keeps tabs on +300 million American suspects. The difference between a Republic and a Dictatorship is election, but both governments give unfair power to one person to rule all people, and both are productive of heartless, cruel atrocities.
The Ending
By what right does a police officer have to detain me, anymore than I have the right to detain the police officer? How isa president more qualified to rule a populace than a dictator? Why is it so impossible to imagine a society that rules itself, with Direct Democracy, and no leaders or police officers?
For Life,
Punkerslut
http://www.punkerslut.com
Punkerslut (or Andy Carloff) has been writing essays and poetry on social issues which have caught his attention for several years. His website http://www.punkerslut.com provides a complete list of all of these writings.
apartment cleaning near Highland Park ..United Liberation Front of Assam (ULFA), one of the most... Read More
After arranging the Armistice that ended or settled outstanding issues... Read More
I just got done reading a series of articles dating... Read More
Are the junior attorneys in the Attorney General's office leaving... Read More
The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) estimated that there were... Read More
"Had there not been outsourcing and utilization of cheaper resources... Read More
Since the United States Government is promoting the whistle blower... Read More
Mexico the country of Salsa, Tortillas and Corruption; I first... Read More
When were the forms of media created? When did advertising... Read More
Tonight I resigned myself to the fact that this is... Read More
How can any human being today, anywhere in this world,... Read More
Well having studying the need for decreasing America's dependence on... Read More
Roberto Calvo Macias, a young author and thinker from Spain,... Read More
Blessed with Chinese GDP growth rates (7-8% annually in each... Read More
Continued thoughts while driving down the road in a huge... Read More
The notion that local governments should have almost total monopoly... Read More
Our government is set up like a modern day franchise.... Read More
"Similar to Medieval Inquisitions, judges have been given the authority,... Read More
All countries have specific things that are abundant in the... Read More
Currently when we transport troops we use large cargo planes... Read More
The United States has never done a full study on... Read More
We know that in Maryland, which some call "Merry Land"... Read More
I've decided to go public with my intentions: I will... Read More
In these times when states are suffering extreme downward pressure... Read More
China is serious about breaking into the bio-tech field and... Read More
cleaning lady near Arlington Heights ..I read an interesting article in foreign Affairs magazine last... Read More
You know now that North Korea is backing down on... Read More
"Had there not been outsourcing and utilization of cheaper resources... Read More
Mexico the country of Salsa, Tortillas and Corruption; I first... Read More
With the recent shakeups in the presidential cabinet, it has... Read More
Capitalism as the social structure was founded in order to... Read More
The paper industry in the US is hurting. Due to... Read More
We recently saw another ferry accident, this one in NY... Read More
Why are we over regulating the franchising industry? What are... Read More
I. OVERVIEWIn the wake of the September 11 terrorist attacks... Read More
With people living longer we have some problems as those... Read More
An interesting conversation that I thought I must share with... Read More
Three years ago I published a book of short stories... Read More
Legislation is getting legs to further curtail your use of... Read More
The Federal Trade Commission has very important Anti-trust Laws. They... Read More
Fearful that terrorists will next target Australia, Prime Minister John... Read More
They do not allow the criticism of the president in... Read More
Many times our government regulatory over embellish problems in the... Read More
The process of researching this topic has been an interesting... Read More
The filibuster has been a tool available to U.S. Senators... Read More
The idea that the majority shows the will of the... Read More
Bill Cosby got it wrong. His many speeches regarding the... Read More
Many people make a lot of money in war. In... Read More
I have to be honest. It is time to come... Read More
The idea is to have all the important items with... Read More
Political |