[Author's Note: Another essay that I wrote on notebook paper during boring school hours. This wonderful little piece was starting in boring English class on Tuesday, November 26, 2002, and continued into Art class. It was finished in school on Tuesday, December 2, 2002, when I finished it in English class. I worked on it in no other class, and finished it within a few classes. Hooray for high school.]
The Beginning
If a group of people were to live on an island, who would govern who, how, and why? If person A suspected person B of possessing a deadly weapon (if this were a crime), then how could we justify person A searching person B? Whatever reason offered for justification of search and seizure, it aso justifies person B searching person A. On this island, who would be the government? Who would rule? Whatever can justify the rule of person A can also justify the rule of person B. If one person is elected on the island, through some sort of Republic process, how is he justified in passing and enforcing laws? If an elected ruler passes a law that anyone to wear a hat is killed, would it not be equally justified for one dissident to make their own government, passing legislation that wearing hats is acceptable?
A government may be defined as a person or a persons trying to enforce a rule or regulation. And if one government can be formed by one person, with legislation passed that possessing head fashion is illegal, so another one is not more wrong in making it legal.
By what right would one government have the right to tell one person to do, any more than the one person would have the right to tell what the government to do? Is there anything intrinsically distinctive of either the individual or the government that allows one to control the other without restraint? If this individual opposed the state's regulation as much as the state opposed the individual's actions, how is one more justified in controlling the other? There can be no appeal to one being intrinsically right and one being intrinsically wrong: there have been just as many bad governments as there have been bad rebels. So, if a party of people lived on an island, who would govern who, and how could it possibly be justified?
Take into consideration the lack of justification for government to rule anyone on this island, as for the United States to rule anyone on this land. Just as a government on the island can oppose an individual's actions, so does our United States government oppose some of our actions, as they carry out their regulation. Use of Marijuana, a harmless practice, has been banned by the state. By what writ can the government jail Marijuana users, any more than Marijuana users can enforce their own regulation allowing Marijuana? If a police officer is justified in arresting members of society who do no harm but just commit a crime, then a citizen must be justified in arresting the government equally. There is no divine mandate given to anyone to rule, control, and kill others, be it any populace member or any government.
The similarities between the hypothetical island scenario and the United States government are undeniable. The United States government has no right to rule me any more than I have a right to rule those people who make up the government. Nor ar they justified in any of their legislation, and enforcing their legislation, whether it is outlawing murder, wearing hats, or believing what you want. The government has no right to pass such laws any more than I have the right to pass such laws.
The Middle
The Republic is a type of government where the people vote for one person to rule all. This varies from other types of governments where, more or less, a ruler maintains their power. By maintaining power, I do not mean by campaigning, but rather by an army theratening the populace. Such a ruler may be known as a dictator or a monarch. However, there are some who stipulate that a king's rule is tryanny to the rule of an elected official. What can there be, honestly, to separate the rule of a dictator and the rule of an elected official? Historically, both are prone to commit the most atrocious acts, often defending themselves with the idea that they are defending their land.
Furthermore, both presidents and kings have accepted bribery and corruption. What can there be to separate a Dictatorship and a Republic? It still gives one person, out of thousands, possibly millions, it gives this one person control over the rest of the populace. And whether or not a Constitution exists in this Monarchy or Republic, kings and presidents have both trampled them to pieces in the wake of their search for power and wealth. There is one solitary difference between a dictator and a president: one is elected, one is not. The similarities between these two, though, is endless: their cruel search for power, the history of their relentlessness in eliminating enemies, they rule a population without restrain or control, save the remnants of their conscience.
The United States' administration differs from that of a Latin Dictatorship in one way: how they are chosen. The United States goes through the process of election where we choose our president, but even this failed, as the majority voted against the president who seized power. If there is any proof of corruption of power, of how a president is nothing more than a dictator, then let it be this: our current president was voted against by the people, but he rules us anyway. His laws control our bodies, even though we did not choose him. George W. Bush is not in power because he was elected. He is in power because of his army, because of his secret, underground spy network which keeps tabs on +300 million American suspects. The difference between a Republic and a Dictatorship is election, but both governments give unfair power to one person to rule all people, and both are productive of heartless, cruel atrocities.
The Ending
By what right does a police officer have to detain me, anymore than I have the right to detain the police officer? How isa president more qualified to rule a populace than a dictator? Why is it so impossible to imagine a society that rules itself, with Direct Democracy, and no leaders or police officers?
For Life,
Punkerslut
http://www.punkerslut.com
Punkerslut (or Andy Carloff) has been writing essays and poetry on social issues which have caught his attention for several years. His website http://www.punkerslut.com provides a complete list of all of these writings.
monthly home cleaning Buffalo Grove ..Just because we have been leading the World in innovation... Read More
In a move that rocked the online world and left... Read More
Environmentalists say GM Seeds are bad for the environment, dangerous... Read More
In the previous article, we described the various methods developed... Read More
"Similar to Medieval Inquisitions, judges have been given the authority,... Read More
For years I have been amazed as I've listened to... Read More
Presently Universities and Private Enterprise are working to build more... Read More
The Bill of Rights to our Constitution caused -- and... Read More
IntroductionThe way one lyrist has written, "Hum logo ko samajh... Read More
Visible remnants of the world's eldest democracy can be seen... Read More
The head of the Club of Rome has said that... Read More
The clause (c) of Electronic Crime Act 2004 has been... Read More
Those of us hundreds of miles from ground zero sat... Read More
As I read the papers and watch the news day... Read More
The UAV, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle is hear to stay and... Read More
America must implement a policy on Election Reform that is... Read More
The first reaction of economies in transition is a sharp... Read More
All countries have specific things that are abundant in the... Read More
Many had made mention of the problems of business opportunities... Read More
Public utilities and a problematic issue on the allowance of... Read More
For the business community 9-11 changed everything. In our company,... Read More
Do you find it interesting that people complain about the... Read More
Each day the present geo-political reality confirms what The Tribulation... Read More
How can any human being today, anywhere in this world,... Read More
While many Pennsylvanians are struggling to figure out how they... Read More
scheduled maid service Mundelein ..Is the Federal Trade Commission really stopping SPAM? Is the... Read More
Iran's objection to ratifying the International Atomic Energy Agency's Additional... Read More
Commission for Africa (CFA), one is made to understand is... Read More
Rational, sober, logical citizens wonder what exactly the terrorists want.... Read More
Elliot Spitzer, recently said he wanted to drive a stake... Read More
As the populations expand in Colorado outside of Denver, Las... Read More
Most government agencies cannot pass an audit of their expenses.... Read More
Telemarketing and DO NOT CALL lists sure made headlines, but... Read More
It appears we are getting a little bit of Sun... Read More
Many have lost faith in the government and are completely... Read More
As we increase our populations every new soul will require... Read More
I was dismayed to learn the other day, that my... Read More
It can be dangerous to engage in free speech. This... Read More
Clint Eastwood recently plunged into the murky political pond with... Read More
Industrial Recruiting. The absence of a state income tax in... Read More
We have all heard of the huge debates surrounding genetically... Read More
I watch the TV news and I get angry. I... Read More
I'm starting to feel squeezed by all the political correctness... Read More
The process of researching this topic has been an interesting... Read More
The Palestinian Fatah Movement is doing whatever it can to... Read More
If we go hog wild towards the liberal agenda where... Read More
Those of us hundreds of miles from ground zero sat... Read More
Unions are angry at the high salary of the executives... Read More
As global warming continues to escalate the concerns of today's... Read More
In response to Douglas Bower's article; Logic Class 101 Applied... Read More
Political |