[Author's Note: Another essay that I wrote on notebook paper during boring school hours. This wonderful little piece was starting in boring English class on Tuesday, November 26, 2002, and continued into Art class. It was finished in school on Tuesday, December 2, 2002, when I finished it in English class. I worked on it in no other class, and finished it within a few classes. Hooray for high school.]
The Beginning
If a group of people were to live on an island, who would govern who, how, and why? If person A suspected person B of possessing a deadly weapon (if this were a crime), then how could we justify person A searching person B? Whatever reason offered for justification of search and seizure, it aso justifies person B searching person A. On this island, who would be the government? Who would rule? Whatever can justify the rule of person A can also justify the rule of person B. If one person is elected on the island, through some sort of Republic process, how is he justified in passing and enforcing laws? If an elected ruler passes a law that anyone to wear a hat is killed, would it not be equally justified for one dissident to make their own government, passing legislation that wearing hats is acceptable?
A government may be defined as a person or a persons trying to enforce a rule or regulation. And if one government can be formed by one person, with legislation passed that possessing head fashion is illegal, so another one is not more wrong in making it legal.
By what right would one government have the right to tell one person to do, any more than the one person would have the right to tell what the government to do? Is there anything intrinsically distinctive of either the individual or the government that allows one to control the other without restraint? If this individual opposed the state's regulation as much as the state opposed the individual's actions, how is one more justified in controlling the other? There can be no appeal to one being intrinsically right and one being intrinsically wrong: there have been just as many bad governments as there have been bad rebels. So, if a party of people lived on an island, who would govern who, and how could it possibly be justified?
Take into consideration the lack of justification for government to rule anyone on this island, as for the United States to rule anyone on this land. Just as a government on the island can oppose an individual's actions, so does our United States government oppose some of our actions, as they carry out their regulation. Use of Marijuana, a harmless practice, has been banned by the state. By what writ can the government jail Marijuana users, any more than Marijuana users can enforce their own regulation allowing Marijuana? If a police officer is justified in arresting members of society who do no harm but just commit a crime, then a citizen must be justified in arresting the government equally. There is no divine mandate given to anyone to rule, control, and kill others, be it any populace member or any government.
The similarities between the hypothetical island scenario and the United States government are undeniable. The United States government has no right to rule me any more than I have a right to rule those people who make up the government. Nor ar they justified in any of their legislation, and enforcing their legislation, whether it is outlawing murder, wearing hats, or believing what you want. The government has no right to pass such laws any more than I have the right to pass such laws.
The Middle
The Republic is a type of government where the people vote for one person to rule all. This varies from other types of governments where, more or less, a ruler maintains their power. By maintaining power, I do not mean by campaigning, but rather by an army theratening the populace. Such a ruler may be known as a dictator or a monarch. However, there are some who stipulate that a king's rule is tryanny to the rule of an elected official. What can there be, honestly, to separate the rule of a dictator and the rule of an elected official? Historically, both are prone to commit the most atrocious acts, often defending themselves with the idea that they are defending their land.
Furthermore, both presidents and kings have accepted bribery and corruption. What can there be to separate a Dictatorship and a Republic? It still gives one person, out of thousands, possibly millions, it gives this one person control over the rest of the populace. And whether or not a Constitution exists in this Monarchy or Republic, kings and presidents have both trampled them to pieces in the wake of their search for power and wealth. There is one solitary difference between a dictator and a president: one is elected, one is not. The similarities between these two, though, is endless: their cruel search for power, the history of their relentlessness in eliminating enemies, they rule a population without restrain or control, save the remnants of their conscience.
The United States' administration differs from that of a Latin Dictatorship in one way: how they are chosen. The United States goes through the process of election where we choose our president, but even this failed, as the majority voted against the president who seized power. If there is any proof of corruption of power, of how a president is nothing more than a dictator, then let it be this: our current president was voted against by the people, but he rules us anyway. His laws control our bodies, even though we did not choose him. George W. Bush is not in power because he was elected. He is in power because of his army, because of his secret, underground spy network which keeps tabs on +300 million American suspects. The difference between a Republic and a Dictatorship is election, but both governments give unfair power to one person to rule all people, and both are productive of heartless, cruel atrocities.
The Ending
By what right does a police officer have to detain me, anymore than I have the right to detain the police officer? How isa president more qualified to rule a populace than a dictator? Why is it so impossible to imagine a society that rules itself, with Direct Democracy, and no leaders or police officers?
For Life,
Punkerslut
http://www.punkerslut.com
Punkerslut (or Andy Carloff) has been writing essays and poetry on social issues which have caught his attention for several years. His website http://www.punkerslut.com provides a complete list of all of these writings.
cleaning team near Winnetka ..User BaseThe non-US and non-English Web segments have been boosted... Read More
Please read through this quick thought and discussion as if... Read More
We have known of the innate characteristic need of members... Read More
Some call it the "unofficial" or "informal" economy, others call... Read More
As more and more cities and states set up websites... Read More
Publicity is correlative to your position in the community. Seldom... Read More
There's a new Michigan state register (at https://www.protectmichild.com/) in the... Read More
I believe it would be good for the economy for... Read More
Are the junior attorneys in the Attorney General's office leaving... Read More
The TSA seems to have completely missed the ball at... Read More
Death may not be dignified in any light but the... Read More
Former Senator, Daniel Moynihan, accurately summed up the situation when... Read More
As baby boomers, we have been spoiled all of our... Read More
All countries have specific things that are abundant in the... Read More
As we reel from the news of the recent bombings... Read More
It appears the Feds are suing Elliot Spitzer over his... Read More
I propose a special Projection Device code-named: "TIPED". This system... Read More
OH MAN!Here we go again. I guess now the "proof... Read More
We know we can cloak a giant airship from those... Read More
China maybe stopping some of the SPAM coming into the... Read More
You, the reader, should be aware of my affluence of... Read More
There is a connection between economic growth and unemployment. There... Read More
INTRODUCTIONPERHAPS the sentiments contained in the following pages, are not... Read More
If someone wanted to farm future clones they would need... Read More
De-classification of official documents have been a routine practice in... Read More
family-safe home cleaners Northbrook ..How can any human being today, anywhere in this world,... Read More
Originally published in 1958, "The Ugly American" (Lederer & Burdick)... Read More
When we go through periods of droughts we also have... Read More
We know we can cloak a giant airship from those... Read More
As the Baby Boomer Generation continue to get older, one... Read More
We can all see the issues involved in the cloning... Read More
A governing.com report blast one of the major grassroots initiatives... Read More
Some people say that we cannot put a colony on... Read More
What has really changed in the housing market with regards... Read More
Well here is a great new product, we first saw... Read More
For years I have been amazed as I've listened to... Read More
(Note: This article was written slightly before the 2004 election;... Read More
I am not an African-American. Don't call me an African... Read More
We all know Elliot Spitzer is going to run for... Read More
As baby boomers, we have been spoiled all of our... Read More
Three years ago I published a book of short stories... Read More
Streamlining Homeland Security with a Free market flair? An idea... Read More
President George W. Bush has unofficially won his re-election bid... Read More
Are the junior attorneys in the Attorney General's office leaving... Read More
Telemarketing and DO NOT CALL lists sure made headlines, but... Read More
According to a postulate made by Ignacio Ramonet ecological resources... Read More
The United States has never done a full study on... Read More
Ever wonder why labor unions consistently endorse democrats over republicans... Read More
The devastating loss in case of Elliot Spitzer for NY... Read More
This brings to our consciousness, issues concerning the ever rising... Read More
Political |