[Author's Note: Another essay that I wrote on notebook paper during boring school hours. This wonderful little piece was starting in boring English class on Tuesday, November 26, 2002, and continued into Art class. It was finished in school on Tuesday, December 2, 2002, when I finished it in English class. I worked on it in no other class, and finished it within a few classes. Hooray for high school.]
The Beginning
If a group of people were to live on an island, who would govern who, how, and why? If person A suspected person B of possessing a deadly weapon (if this were a crime), then how could we justify person A searching person B? Whatever reason offered for justification of search and seizure, it aso justifies person B searching person A. On this island, who would be the government? Who would rule? Whatever can justify the rule of person A can also justify the rule of person B. If one person is elected on the island, through some sort of Republic process, how is he justified in passing and enforcing laws? If an elected ruler passes a law that anyone to wear a hat is killed, would it not be equally justified for one dissident to make their own government, passing legislation that wearing hats is acceptable?
A government may be defined as a person or a persons trying to enforce a rule or regulation. And if one government can be formed by one person, with legislation passed that possessing head fashion is illegal, so another one is not more wrong in making it legal.
By what right would one government have the right to tell one person to do, any more than the one person would have the right to tell what the government to do? Is there anything intrinsically distinctive of either the individual or the government that allows one to control the other without restraint? If this individual opposed the state's regulation as much as the state opposed the individual's actions, how is one more justified in controlling the other? There can be no appeal to one being intrinsically right and one being intrinsically wrong: there have been just as many bad governments as there have been bad rebels. So, if a party of people lived on an island, who would govern who, and how could it possibly be justified?
Take into consideration the lack of justification for government to rule anyone on this island, as for the United States to rule anyone on this land. Just as a government on the island can oppose an individual's actions, so does our United States government oppose some of our actions, as they carry out their regulation. Use of Marijuana, a harmless practice, has been banned by the state. By what writ can the government jail Marijuana users, any more than Marijuana users can enforce their own regulation allowing Marijuana? If a police officer is justified in arresting members of society who do no harm but just commit a crime, then a citizen must be justified in arresting the government equally. There is no divine mandate given to anyone to rule, control, and kill others, be it any populace member or any government.
The similarities between the hypothetical island scenario and the United States government are undeniable. The United States government has no right to rule me any more than I have a right to rule those people who make up the government. Nor ar they justified in any of their legislation, and enforcing their legislation, whether it is outlawing murder, wearing hats, or believing what you want. The government has no right to pass such laws any more than I have the right to pass such laws.
The Middle
The Republic is a type of government where the people vote for one person to rule all. This varies from other types of governments where, more or less, a ruler maintains their power. By maintaining power, I do not mean by campaigning, but rather by an army theratening the populace. Such a ruler may be known as a dictator or a monarch. However, there are some who stipulate that a king's rule is tryanny to the rule of an elected official. What can there be, honestly, to separate the rule of a dictator and the rule of an elected official? Historically, both are prone to commit the most atrocious acts, often defending themselves with the idea that they are defending their land.
Furthermore, both presidents and kings have accepted bribery and corruption. What can there be to separate a Dictatorship and a Republic? It still gives one person, out of thousands, possibly millions, it gives this one person control over the rest of the populace. And whether or not a Constitution exists in this Monarchy or Republic, kings and presidents have both trampled them to pieces in the wake of their search for power and wealth. There is one solitary difference between a dictator and a president: one is elected, one is not. The similarities between these two, though, is endless: their cruel search for power, the history of their relentlessness in eliminating enemies, they rule a population without restrain or control, save the remnants of their conscience.
The United States' administration differs from that of a Latin Dictatorship in one way: how they are chosen. The United States goes through the process of election where we choose our president, but even this failed, as the majority voted against the president who seized power. If there is any proof of corruption of power, of how a president is nothing more than a dictator, then let it be this: our current president was voted against by the people, but he rules us anyway. His laws control our bodies, even though we did not choose him. George W. Bush is not in power because he was elected. He is in power because of his army, because of his secret, underground spy network which keeps tabs on +300 million American suspects. The difference between a Republic and a Dictatorship is election, but both governments give unfair power to one person to rule all people, and both are productive of heartless, cruel atrocities.
The Ending
By what right does a police officer have to detain me, anymore than I have the right to detain the police officer? How isa president more qualified to rule a populace than a dictator? Why is it so impossible to imagine a society that rules itself, with Direct Democracy, and no leaders or police officers?
For Life,
Punkerslut
http://www.punkerslut.com
Punkerslut (or Andy Carloff) has been writing essays and poetry on social issues which have caught his attention for several years. His website http://www.punkerslut.com provides a complete list of all of these writings.
limo prices to midway Crystal Lake west of Randal .. Lockport Chicago limo O’HareDo you ever wonder how everything gets to the super... Read More
Legislation was introduced into Congress this week that would establish... Read More
When you see hooded Klansmen walking up Pennsylvania Avenue to... Read More
For years we've suffered under recession, prompting us to ask,... Read More
Many of the problems that the members of the European... Read More
Many are condemning the latest GM Terminator seeds. Yet there... Read More
Last Summer the Federal Trade Commission came out with a... Read More
There are many issues on the minds of US voters... Read More
I, too, am saddened by the disaster in New Orleans... Read More
In the words of a secret agent who has signed... Read More
Are the junior attorneys in the Attorney General's office leaving... Read More
The FBI recently before Congress stated that Eco-Terrorism was on... Read More
Many MLM sales people mean well but they inadvertently commit... Read More
Publicity is correlative to your position in the community. Seldom... Read More
The North American Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was implemented on January... Read More
Tax Evasion has been used to criminalize many, Nixon did... Read More
Many non-profit groups are feeling upset that they are allowed... Read More
Up until the final debate at Arizona State University, the... Read More
Much of our personal and cultural perspective on the world... Read More
The FTC franchising division purports their law enforcement experience in... Read More
1. Why is it that no one seems to notice,... Read More
The filibuster has been a tool available to U.S. Senators... Read More
The US-backed Road Map peace plan had no real chance... Read More
1) IS HAVING A DEMOCRACY MORE EFFECTIVE IN ADDRESSING POLITICAL... Read More
When North Americans discuss Cuba, they always focus the intense... Read More
taxi o'hare Auburn ..De-classification of official documents have been a routine practice in... Read More
With new environmental technologies and modern efficiency methods in mining... Read More
Their arrival portends rising local prices and a culture shock.... Read More
Recently I met a man in a coffee shop, a... Read More
Legislation is getting legs to further curtail your use of... Read More
Is the only way to fight Fundamentalist Extremists becoming one... Read More
Here are some miscellaneous thoughts on issues many of which... Read More
"The only time I open my mouth is when I... Read More
Industrial Recruiting. The absence of a state income tax in... Read More
Well many have complained that the FBI and CIA dropped... Read More
Prison guards and corrections professionals are hard at work insuring... Read More
Entrepreneurs can clean up the environment if we would let... Read More
Let's put the religious part of the debate for a... Read More
Currently the US Army is having trouble recruiting. These problems... Read More
One third of all fertilized eggs spontaneously abort and are... Read More
Our Airports have excess capacity, which is not being used... Read More
Having been to every city in the country over the... Read More
This is a thought on the study of Home and... Read More
There are many mines around the world, which are owned... Read More
I have witnessed a new era of security in the... Read More
As baby boomers, we have been spoiled all of our... Read More
INTRODUCTIONPERHAPS the sentiments contained in the following pages, are not... Read More
I, too, am saddened by the disaster in New Orleans... Read More
An irresponsible Chinese General made a very telling comment recently.... Read More
A visitor to Moscow would be immediately struck by the... Read More
Political |